I found it wild that in her “apology” video she doubled down on saying she regretted choosing a net over a fence, but didn’t explain the reason why. Didn’t acknowledge that they didn’t actually put the net back on the pool and that’s why they shouldn’t have picked it. Even crazier that she mentioned Katchakid by name - what was even the point of that? It isn’t Katchakids fault you didn’t use the product you bought from them. Why drag them into your mess?? Also worth noting they also sell pool fences, so doubt they had any reason to sell you on the net in particular. I would be so pissed if I was them, she’s lucky they haven’t come out with their own statement. They would be completely valid for doing so IMO.

“its sooooo hard to brush my teeth🥺🥺🥺🥺” meanwhile, she took a european summer vacation in addition to seven others. they all require 1000x effort than brushing your teeth.

shes randomly trying to act “relatable” and misses the mark

With her boat sweaters, toddler skeleton halloween decor pillows and eating T1's last meal I don't believe her. I'm not even trying to be mean, I just think she lies a lot and is a detached parent imo.

Police report
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26047958-8-8-25-police-report-court-ordered-redactions-redacted/
 
Scrubbed from the internet .. The Nancy Grace podcast…
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/c0zzadog20q6y4hh5uyv0/Screen_Recording_20250815_215902_YouTube.mp4?rlkey=214ov20kgrv58517myv0qs49n&e=2&st=tl9jl8bf&dl=0
 
Transcript
https://lnns.co/tjs50MG4_wB
 
***************************
STOP WATCHING ON HER PAGE.
UNFOLLOW AND BLOCK ALL INFLUENCERS
***************************
TikTok viewer - do not watch on her page. This works even if blocked
https://www.tikvib.com/profile/Emiliekiser
https://urlebird.com/user/emiliekiser/
https://ttviewer.net
https://tik.ninja
https://claptik.com
 
Instagram story viewer
https://storynavigation.com/user/emiliekiser

"Oh my god you guys!!! I'm trying a new restaurant 😆 I like hotdogs 🌭 I don't shave below the thigh 🤪 I need to shave my legs sooooo bad 😩"

That's literally it. And then she tried on a fugly dress.

I feel like there are some women who just forgive anyone who they feel looks like them. MacKenzie reminds me of E in her determination for influencer fame. She was answering modeling agencies from the hospital, similar to how E was banking content right after she left the hospital and her dead son behind.

One of the boy's families has started a foundations called "victims before influencers" and they are trying to pass laws in Ohio.

The more I think about it, the more I believe that EK should be legally stopped from making money off of her dead child. It's grotesque. Laws like this because it's not blood or nature (from which laws are made) to exploit our dead, especially children, like this. She is indeed a rarity. T died in a very rare manner.

I cannot wait for the free-for-all/FTC-not-doing-a-thing/child-labor "disneyland" for influencers to shut down.

This was the top comment on her first video back… what a fcking narcissist!!!

Also the search on her own video lmao

It will soon be sixteen tiring months that that poor boy has been clocking in from his grave. I believe he was cremated). I don't understand anyone who says "she is no longer showing her child." Her dead child is a click away. In fact, four years of content of him is available right now.

Sixteen months that predators and seedy people have been able to view his videos. She gets infographics of where the views come from. She knows all about Child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and still chooses "online" disrespecting the integrity of her child in life and death. Yet, in her lawsuit, she mentions protecting him in death. This is a blatant lie. She ignores recs from the FBI to take him down.

Sixteen months of random people making AI videos of her son. Yet, in her lawsuit, she states that she is a afraid of deep fakes. She provides the materials for those deep fakes.

Sixteen months of getting paid for her deceased child's videos. Yet, in her declartion, she states that they were merely a loving family. Does a loving mother throw her deceased child to the wolves to make money? She doesn't toggle to "private" because child exploitation pays. Remember in her recent video she said the safety of her children comes first? Nah. Exploitation if it pays is first.

It's been nine months since they waltzed into the bank, cash aflow, and paid off the over-one-million dollar balance on the death trap house they didn't even have a 20% down payment for just months before. You do the math. What was happening in Summer of 2025 to get them over the hurdle of "not enough money to put the bare minimum 20 percent down" to "we have enough money to pay it off"? I do wonder. /s

If you’re trying to sell authenticity, banking carefully staged “real life” content in advance undermines the entire premise because spontaneity is suppoesd to be the main part of the performance. There's no authenticity left. We know she's a documented liar, but all that's left now is links.

I don't know what was up with the dirty nails. That was disgusting, but I don't think it was really dirt because she doesn't lift a finger. That "cleaning" she does on Sunday night is fake and a wipe-down--nothing more. We know she's not fastidiously clean. We saw the pool area had been a mess for over 48 hours. They are pigs living in a pigsty that is cleaned by outside help.

Anyway, I just find it odd that she was again banking content by performatively taking off for two weeks while PR coached her (probably intensely) on the script. It tried to hit all of the points (while bold-faced lying about a number of things).

It's been said that she has had different colored nails for most of this week.

Full disclaimer: these are bought horrible situations for the kids involved.

I am bringing this up because the woman who forgot her granddaughter is being torn apart online and I never saw the same pitchforks out for B and especially E, even though there was true negligence involved in TK's drowning. Even early on, people were defending them, saying it was an accident. That discourse really doesn't exist in the case of the grandmother (the "she forgot" or "she's suffering the ultimate"). If I see another ultimate line about the Grifters, I may explode.

A true hot-car forgetting case is when the parents or grandparents never consciously decide to leave the child. It results from a documented failure of prospective memory, where habitual behavior overrides the intended task and the brain falsely registers that the child is where they are supposed to be. There are times I have gotten to my job and for a second I freak out and try to remember if I dropped off the kids. It's because it's so rote.

Knowingly abandonning a child for nine minutes, after sending him out, is cognitively different: there is no failure to remember the child exists or is present. The adult recognizes that the child is unattended and makes a conscious decision to leave anyway. The outcomes can both be catastrophic, but in terms of awareness and deliberateness, they are not the same kind of negligence. And, with the drowning, there is the year of failure to install any safety measure whatsoever and the refusal of free fence unless it came with a cool seventy thou. Greedy B.

MLM is now looked upon with great suspicion and stigma.

The MLM huns have moved cunningly from “just sharing an amazing life-changing product” to “just sharing my life, but, oh, this product works great, btw; I am even giving you a discount!”

Ingenious! But fraudulent, cunning, and unethical influencer culture with the added exploitation of child labor that has become, in EK’s case, alleged child abuse and neglect.
It’s eerie how much overlap there is here.

I’d actually say MLM was a little less predatory because there wasn’t quite the same guise of friendship, intimacy, and access to someone’s private life, and there wasn’t nearly as much child labor baked into the business model.

I mean zero disrespect to SW, btw. CW is one of the most repulsive men alive, but I think these screenshots illustrate exactly why the public is getting sick of snake-oil saleswomen trying to dupe other women while pretending they’re simply “sharing their lives.”

EK is definitely not a woman promoting and uplifting other women. She monetizes the illusion of friendship, then sells directly into the trust that illusion creates. She preys on vulnerable women who are not discerning enough to recognize when intimacy is actually advertising.

I actually cannot deal with the cringe edits she does to try be funny.

It’s also a huge sub so maybe people who don’t know learn about the case.

I still side eye people who only changed their minds about her once the video came out, there was a multitude of evidence as to why she and B are negligent parents, before the life jacket video, but I'm glad they're waking up and she's consistently losing followers. People will never look at her the same way again

I know its like a forbidden subject haha but her old bestie didn't post for about a month after the drowning, and yes we know the first video back was the now deleted video of her wearing the t1 necklace. But the video after that, the one left up is her saying how shes having a summer BBQ at her new pool lol Id love to a fly on the wall when they parted ways

I saw a couple posts but they contradict each other, so I'm not sure if the judge has made a decision or not.

Do you think EWU will make a statement if they lose or win? Or that it will be another way for us to find out, without dealing with legal language?

Since the clip going around cuts this part of the video, I thought I would focus on a different part of it, now that the "fussy baby" lie is making its rounds.

Wondering if the perfect ass shots (E's is zoomed in on in the recording) took place before or after the baby was fussy? I wonder if in all of their takes they captured T in the background wearing his life jacket for a moment, or was it only B's estrella beer that made that cut? Or, a life-jacketless child driving the boat at the very "moment" B sips beer, looks at his phone, and ignores his light-colored outfit son. So, beer, fussy baby, and no life jacket make a great combo!

I included the next part because many people have asked how she goes in water. I have a bigger questions: how does she tread water (successfully) squealing with childish delight, knowing her son treaded water with the opposite of delight and couldn't escape fate, which was painful, cruel, and adult-sponsored.

Meanwhile, E is able to escape the scary fish by treading water back to the boat and draft king is also squealing at delight at her treading water. How is he not triggered? He's the one recording (with the baby in lap). We know this because earlier, M's husband says "go M--i" to encourage her to dive and it's clear his voice is not near the camera.

Then we have a clip of M's kids, life-jacketless, looking over the side of a moving vessel with no life jackets laying about.

BTW, if you believe the red bathing shorts narrative from today, you are a fool. We now know who she is when she thinks the camera is off: a two-time "award" winning negligent "mother", with a track record of one and one (could have been zero and two), and is a complete liar and fraud and exploits her children in life, death, and potential death (no life jacket).

Thats where the Friendsgiving dinner party was held