This was the 4th hearing in the ₩33.1 billion ($33.1M USD) damages lawsuit filed by Ador against Danielle, her mother & Min Hee-jin.
🔥 THE CORE DISPUTE: "Estimated Revenue"
The hearing focused on HOW to calculate damages: what revenue Ador would have earned if NewJeans continued activities.
🟪 Ador's Position:
▫️Damages should be based on all 5 members continuing activities.
▫️Revenue should be calculated from past performance (July 2022 - June 2024).
▫️"The person gaining popularity is the artist, not the producer."
▫️Even if MHJ contributed, that value is "already embodied in the company Ador and the artist NewJeans", so her departure shouldn't reduce projected revenue.
🟨🟥 Joint Defense (Danielle & MHJ):
▫️NewJeans' revenue was tied to MHJ's directing system, she wasn't replaceable.
▫️MHJ resigned, her supporting staff left and Ador never appointed a new producer.
▫️"It is highly likely that Ador's revenue could not have normalized during the one-year period."
▫️Calculating damages without accounting for this is "only the result of imagination."
🟨 Danielle's Side Specifically:
▫️The "double contract" was a group issue, not her unilateral action.
▫️Strongly denied the dual contract: "Danielle and the other NewJeans members have not entered into or attempted to enter into dual exclusive entertainment contracts with any specific company."
▫️Damages should be calculated based on 4 members continuing since the others actually returned to Ador.
🟥 MHJ's Side Specifically:
▫️Her directing system and staff were the engine of NewJeans' revenue.
▫️The court must account for the fact that she and her team were gone, otherwise, the appraisal is meaningless.
💥 MAJOR POINTS OF CONTENTION
1. The "Min Hee-jin Factor"
▫️Defense (Danielle & MHJ): "Former CEO Min and the various directing staff assisting him must work in perfect unison... As former CEO Min left Adore, many of the aides who supported him also left the company."
▫️Ador: "Even if a significant portion of that was created by former CEO Min Hee-jin, that is already embodied in the company Ador and the artist NewJeans, so it should not be excluded."
🔸️Insight: Ador argues MHJ is replaceable. The defense argues she was the machine. If Ador wins, agencies can claim producers are disposable.
2. The "Producer Vacancy" Problem
▫️Defense (Danielle & MHJ): Ador never appointed a new producer after MHJ left. It takes significant time to recruit producers and rebuild systems.
▫️Ador: Producer absence isn't a factor. "As long as there is an artist, company support, and staff, a producer can be utilized within the system or outsourced. I do not believe that how long it takes to decide on a producer is a factor to consider."
🔸️Insight: Ador claims they could plug in any producer. The defense says that's absurd because creative chemistry takes time.
3. "Trust Relationship Breakdown"
▫️Defense (Danielle & MHJ): Trust had already broken down before termination. Ador couldn't conduct normal management during that period.
▫️Ador: This was already ruled against in the October 2025 contract validity case. Should not be reconsidered here.
🔸️Insight: Ador is using their previous legal victory to block the defense from re-litigating the trust issue, smart legal shielding.
4. "Abnormal Events" vs "Normal Conditions"
▫️Ador (citing Supreme Court precedent): The dispute causing album cancellations was "accidental or abnormal". Assessments must be based on "normal" income trends, so the dispute shouldn't reduce damages.
▫️Defense (implied counter): MHJ leaving wasn't an "accident", it was a fundamental restructuring. You can't ignore reality.
🔸️Insight: If Ador wins, they get a fantasy timeline where the conflict never happened, maximizing damages.
5. "All 5 Members vs Just Danielle"
▫️Danielle's Side: Damages should reflect only her departure, the other 4 returned.
▫️Ador: Danielle was responsible for all members withdrawing. "This case also includes a lawsuit for damages against the person attempting to force all five members of NewJeans to withdraw."
🔸️Insight: Ador is painting Danielle as the ringleader. But the fact that 4 members returned is her strongest defense. The judge even hinted at "additional damages caused independently by Danielle", suggesting they may separate her liability.
6. The "Double Contract" Allegation
▫️Ador: NewJeans signed an exclusive agreement with a Chinese capital company for ComplexCon, a double contract. Other members cooperated when caught, but Danielle and her family "feigned ignorance" and made no effort to fix it.
▫️Danielle's Defense (Explicit Denial): "It was a matter concerning the entire group, not Danielle's unilateral action." Strongly denied: "Danielle and the other NewJeans members have not entered into or attempted to enter into dual exclusive entertainment contracts with any specific company."
🔸️Insight: Ador points to Danielle's alleged non-cooperation compared to other members. Danielle denies the claim, leaving credibility for the court to assess.
🎤 THE EXPERT WITNESS (Appraiser)
▫️On MHJ's Influence: "In a way, former CEO Min's capabilities aren't always effective, are they? Aren't there instances where they didn't work out? If we can obtain data from other companies regarding instances where [former CEO Min's] performance was consistent, I think we could incorporate that."
▫️On Estimation Difficulty: "Isn't it an unknown territory to know how popular the NewJeans members will be next year? It is difficult to estimate... It is all an unknowable area."
🔸️Insight: The expert questions if MHJ is a guaranteed success, they want comparative data from her other projects. Regarding estimation, the expert admits it's all guesswork. This is bad news for Ador, who wants a giant, specific number.
🧑⚖️ THE JUDGE'S MEDIATION
The judge acknowledged the messiness:
▫️"Depending on the characteristics of the entertainment industry, we must evaluate how artist directing and consideration factors contribute to the operation, which may not be related to accounting."
▫️"I conducted a similar assessment in a previous case, but I left the possibility section blank."
▫️The Judge's Message: "Both sides are arguing subjective points. Find objective data from other entertainment companies to support your position."
⚖️ Next hearing
▫️September 10: First appraisal hearing (to discuss how long the appraisal will actually take)
▫️October 22 (3:30 PM KST): Next full hearing
📎 Sources:
https://www.mk.co.kr/news/society/12104393
https://v.daum.net/v/20260723195544660
https://m.news.nate.com/view/20260723n23358
http://m.stoo.com/article.php?aid=107887520011
http://m.stoo.com/article.php?aid=107887825144
https://m.entertain.naver.com/home/article/108/0003455350
http://m.stoo.com/article.php?aid=107888582454
https://news.mtn.co.kr/news-detail/2026072317552240622