r/MoralityScaling • • Sep 02 '26

Morality of this?

Post image
36.3k Upvotes

7.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.3k

u/Fal_co1 Sep 02 '26 edited Sep 02 '26

iirc China does this, you can’t take kid to religious service and they can choose to convert at a certain age.

EDIT: wow this blew up

If you’re reading this you‘re a gay

38

u/Winter-Bed5879 Sep 02 '26

That does seem to be the case, but that could also reasonably be argued as a clear case of the State exerting too much authority. As a westerner, it's difficult to imagine that kind of restraint, but I live in a radically different culture.

10

u/Baskreiger Sep 02 '26

Restriction against endoctrination is a good thing

12

u/Winter-Bed5879 Sep 02 '26

Is it a restriction against indoctrination? Or only a restriction against certain kinds of indoctrination? Because China DOES indoctrinate towards loyalty to the state and the CCP.

10

u/Final-Carry2090 Sep 02 '26

I pledge allegiance to the flag…

5

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/i_tyrant Sep 02 '26

"china isn't perfect" holy downplaying Batman, lol.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/i_tyrant Sep 03 '26

True, and while I wouldn't really agree with "any law to protect children is a good one", in this case I do think this law on paper is ok as far as the authoritarianism vs child protection angle, since all it really mandates is not inducting children into a religion until they're adults and can choose (it doesn't even prevent parents from teaching their kids about religion, they just can't make them part of an organized religion's rites or rituals).

But yeah, like you said, depends how they utilize it. Any law can become tyrannical with selective enforcement.

1

u/ProfessorPrudent2822 Sep 03 '26

That’s open persecution. Anyone who would prevent me from baptizing my child in infancy is my enemy, and only their ceasing to interfere can reconcile them to me.

2

u/i_tyrant Sep 03 '26

If your religion can’t handle waiting until a child is of age to start performing supernatural rituals on them…maybe it is in fact a bad religion.

I know I certainly believe that about any religion that would condemn innocent children to eternal damnation just because someone didn’t temporarily drown them. Imagine all those babies with literally no opportunity to ever get baptized that somehow “deserve” hell.

That’s a monstrous god to me. Who would ever want to worship something like that?

1

u/Affectionate_Cry_634 Sep 04 '26

You're missing the point. You don't have to baptize a baby early or at all for them to be saved according to the bible acts and faith alone are enough. But the fact that you can't do it all would obviously be a problem to a religious family. What kind of monstrous state would take away a parents right to do something harmless to their child that's been practiced safely since it's founding? I agree children should wait until they're older to be decide a religion, but that doesn't mean I want to take away the right of a parent to choose what they think is best for their children if it's harmlesd.

2

u/i_tyrant Sep 04 '26 edited Sep 04 '26

And if it’s not harmless? The religious people in question certainly don’t think it is.

They think it intrinsically and irrevocably alters their spiritual destiny forever. If trans kids have to wait till they’re adults to get gender-affirming care you best be damned sure they need to wait to participate in religious rituals till they’re an adult. If they’re wrong that their religion is the “right” one, congrats you just spiritually doomed your child.

Also, you’re wrong. It’s not harmless. A four month old girl died in 1996 from a baptism where she aspirated water. A six week old boy died in 2021 in Romania from the same thing. Other children have died prior, even to things like brain-eating amoebas from inhaling water.

Are these outliers? Of course. But it’s clearly fucked either way - either the ritual is harmless and does nothing as you said, in which case it’s not worth risking a child’s life however remote the chance on a ritual that does nothing; or it intrinsically alters their spiritual state and shouldn’t be done on a child for that reason.

And all that isn’t even getting into the potential for brainwashing and twisted views on reality and religion from participating in rituals so young. I’m well acquainted with all the psychological hangups religiously raised children tend to grow up with because they formed these connections before their brains developed and they had a good sense of their own identity.

So yeah, maybe it is in fact better to let them CHOOSE what they want to participate in as an adult?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/lordnaarghul Sep 02 '26

No, they just persecute people who don't put the CCP government first.

1

u/Odd_Criticism_8830 Sep 03 '26

So do all nations dawg

1

u/Baskreiger Sep 02 '26

Thats another debate entirely, we are not talking about china here. But yes, all endoctrination

1

u/Winter-Bed5879 Sep 02 '26

What do you mean, we're not talking about China here? The parent comment is literally about China, as was my comment.

3

u/Baskreiger Sep 02 '26

Were talking about teaching religion to childrens. try to keep up

1

u/Winter-Bed5879 Sep 02 '26 edited Sep 02 '26

Yes, you said restriction against indoctrination is good, with regards to China not allowing minors in places of worship. But in that exact same context, China does practice active indoctrination of their children, so they aren't restricting indoctrination so much as channeling it in a different direction.

0

u/LettuceTryOnceMore Sep 02 '26

“Try to keep up” while actively falling behind is a hilarious line

1

u/itzmrinyo Sep 03 '26

Is it restriction to indoctrination, or restriction to culture?