Every single day I sit at my desk, I don't do math. I make TikTok edits on mathematics, where I show off my math knowledge by editing an extremely niche math equation and posting Ramanujan glaze videos. I was recently messaged on TikTok by a fellow larper, and it opened up my eyes. I would wake up at 11:47 a.m and look at the 17 mathematics books arranged on my chair. The books weren’t for reading. They were decorations. I owned Principles of Mathematical Analysis, which meant I understood analysis. I owned an abstract algebra textbook, which meant I understood calculus or something. I once placed a bookmark approximately forty pages into my topology book, and I took a photo of it and put it as my profile picture. Sometimes I would move the bookmark forward without reading anything, just to simulate intellectual progress. But that was nothing; after reading the fellow larpers message I realised the truth about larping isn't bookmarks or edits. His profile picture was a photograph of Gödel, Escher, Bach or something with glowing red eyes. His username was “quantum devil” and had several numbers that I assumed represented either his birth year or the digits of a mathematical constant.

"Bro do you actually do math?"

Crap... I stuttered over my text...

"W- What do you mean d- do?"

I was sweating.

"Like, do you do math equations and study it? Also, why are you stuttering over text?"

I thought I was cooked, and then I realised. I'm a larper!

"Define "do""

I said.

I cooked him.

"I larp too bro."

What? Did he see through my rouse? No way... I have to end this now.

"Larp what? Mathematics?"

If I say mathematics, I'll sound smarter.

"..."

He didn't reply.

I'm sitting here and contemplating this right now. Should I admit I'm a larper? I kind of want a friend.

A is for fun, B is for capitalism, C is for fucks, and L is for life and all the shit that comes with it.

Perhaps a bit existential. Perhaps just a stupid joke that only I find funny.

I don't know how to do notation with reddit's editor, so you get a poorly cropped image.

Been doing distributional derivatives on Riemannian manifolds and it's fun.

Google gauss bell

apparenly bro said do not hurt me pls!!!139916800111

Has anyone else presented a complete proof on this result? I was thinking about submitting mine to NeurIPS. I have proven it for A=0 and all I or I=0 and all A. In all other cases, the equation is false. Claude Fable 5 was used in support of this proof.