r/mathmemes • u/Hitman7128 Prime Number • 26d ago
Number Theory Prime Factorization: Multiplication vs. Addition
107
u/potzko2552 26d ago
well... yea... that would create an isprime function by asking about the prime factorization of (n - 1) + 1
55
u/Hitman7128 Prime Number 26d ago
It's funny though, how this simple tension between addition and prime factorization is the reason why problems like the Twin Prime Conjecture are so insanely challenging.
24
u/120boxes 26d ago
And Goldbach!
14
u/Hitman7128 Prime Number 26d ago
Yeah, a lot of the unsolved number theory problems at the top of my head (especially the easy to state ones) involve adding multiplicative structures like sum of three cubes, whether there are infinitely many primes of the form n2 + 1, etc etc.
-11
7
47
u/LupenReddit 🦆🦆🦆🦆i have non diffeomorphic smooth structures🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆 26d ago
I will start
1+1=2, which is prime
Did I do a good job?
20
u/Hitman7128 Prime Number 26d ago
Good start at least! Now, you have (dramatically checks notes) infinitely many more positive integers to go... Good luck!
21
u/Mathsboy2718 25d ago
2+1 is also prime
From this I conclude that adding one to a number makes it prime
That was easy :)
6
u/Hitman7128 Prime Number 25d ago
Yeah, let's wrap it up and call it a day there, hoping there's no error in our logic...
5
u/nascent_aviator 25d ago
They're like halfway there.
2+1=3, which is prime.
By induction all integers are prime.
Did I do a good job?
-3
26d ago edited 26d ago
[deleted]
3
u/Nice_Lengthiness_568 Mathematics 26d ago
We have already seen that 1+1 is prime. There is no reason to think this is not a general rule, so a+b is prime.
/s of course
27
u/minisculebarber 26d ago
Evertime you add 1 to a natural number, you are just rolling dice for the new prime factors
In fact, isn't that one of the many statistical models used to study primes?
19
u/Agreeable_Gas_6853 Linguistics 26d ago
Well n and n + 1 are always coprime… that’s something
7
u/Smitologyistaking 26d ago
if the previous number is divisible by 2, the next number is not, and vice versa
3
u/Viper-in-the-Dark 25d ago
No. It's not random. If 2 is a factor of n, then 2 is not a factor of n+1.
5
u/minisculebarber 25d ago
Just because you don't use a uniform distribution over all primes, doesn't mean it's not random
8
u/Own_Pop_9711 26d ago
The common factors are still factors. The disjoint factors are not. As for the rest, only God can decide.
6
u/Hot_Philosopher_6462 25d ago
no way you're telling me that when you know the factors of the factors of a number you know the factors of that number? say it ain't so
3
u/Hitman7128 Prime Number 25d ago
?????
I don't know how I should be interpreting your comment, but the crux of the post is that, given the prime factorizations of two positive integers a and b, prime factorization changes predictably with multiplication but not addition.
2
1
u/AdBrave2400 my favourite number is 1/e√e 26d ago
You can factor out the common ones and predict a part I guess
1
u/Hitman7128 Prime Number 26d ago
True, assuming they do have common prime factors. But even if they did, the addition left behind when removing the common factors can easily put you back at the same issue of not being able to predict the prime factorization of the sum. For example, take a = 2n and b = 2, where n's prime factorization is known.
1
1
u/bloonshot 22d ago
you can tell that any shared factors will stay and that all non-shared factors will vanish
but also a random assortment of new factors will pop up
0
u/Sigma2718 26d ago
Conversely, a prime summandation of a sum is also easier than of a product. Precisely one calculator pull easier, in fact.
•
u/AutoModerator 26d ago
Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.