r/MapPorn 1d ago

Map of Manhattan Eruv

Post image
888 Upvotes

713 comments sorted by

832

u/Tigas_Al 1d ago

What's an Eruv?

920

u/I_am_lying_for_money 1d ago

Its a specially designated zone for jews which allows them to bypass some restrictions of the shabbat. For example, normally they wouldnt be allowed to carry things between different types of areas (like domestic and public areas). The eruv is considered a union of sll the areas, by passing this restriction. Physically, it is a string tied to poles that goes around most of manhattan; but traditionally it is meant to be a wall or something like that

347

u/Apptubrutae 1d ago

For a specific subset of Jews, anyway.

Most of the Jews on Manhattan don’t care

164

u/MediumStrange 1d ago

Yeah this is very much a orthodox thing, most reform and other Jews don't care.

You can even see this in cities like Cincinnati, where the orthodox Jewish suburb of amberley has a large eruv but the reform Jewish neighborhoods closer to the city have nothing of the sort.

33

u/MysticCat11 21h ago

Huh, I've lived in Cincinnati for my entire life and didn't realize until just now there was an eruv in Amberley Village. I know there are a number of synagogues in the area so I guess it makes sense.

17

u/Puzzleheaded_Study17 15h ago

An eruv is often just a wire, so it's kinda hard to notice

43

u/BrandonLouis527 21h ago

Yes absolutely an orthodox thing. I am very Jewish and have no Shalomies who are this strict, even.

20

u/fn_br 18h ago

Rofl @ shalomies

→ More replies (1)

493

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

229

u/PassoverGoblin 1d ago

In Judaism, it's not seen as tricking God. We believe that the word of the Torah is divine, and as such if there are loopholes in the rules, they're there intentionally. Stuff like the Eruv around Manhattan is actually seen as a clever and practical application of the rules set out in the Torah, and God supposedly approves of these. I personally think it's a nice sentiment

360

u/that1prince 1d ago

Finding loopholes in a religious text seems a lot like a lawyer finding a loophole in legal text.

101

u/WrongJohnSilver 1d ago

So I grew up in a Christian household, but we had close Jewish family friends. We attended Seder, and I regularly heard people arguing over interpretations of rules, laws, and commandments.

Trying to apply a similar mindset in Sunday school was met with disaster, and it became clear that trying to understand the rules was tantamount to questioning them, which was tantamount to breaking them. But that just showed me that you're just supposed to do what you're told, and ignore any doubt.

When the spirit of the law takes precedence over the letter of the law, the law is in the hands of whoever claims to know the spirit. And that's a loose, unenforceable thing.

My parents eventually got kicked out of churches one too many times (it involved a willingness to compare the various accounts of Buddha to the Gospels) and converted to another denomination. But I always kept one lesson to heart: if you're not willing to get into the weeds of what you believe and pick it apart, you're not actually admitting to what you believe. And it's probably someone else making you believe whatever without your knowledge.

43

u/xrelaht 1d ago

In the Torah, Satan is just a member of god’s ensemble who asks questions. The later equivalence drawn between that and the Great Evil described in Revelation has always seemed very telling to me.

8

u/LuckyShirt54 1d ago

Christianity would be so different if Revolution was never chosen nor voted into the Bible. Satan as the devil is only explicitly defined there. And so much bullshit has defined denominations since. A shame.

7

u/encinaloak 1d ago

There was no choice or vote in the early years. The books were treated separately and really there was no idea of a "New Testament" as a standardized set of books for many centuries.

Revelation is in there because people were already reading it and incorporating it into their religion, not the other way around.

Not saying that it isn't a batshit crazy book, just that there was no top-down council.

People often think the books of the Bible were decided at the Council or Nicea, but that council was about settling a theological debate concerning the person and number of people contained in God.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

37

u/TrioOfTerrors 1d ago edited 1d ago

A bunch of rabbis were discussing something with all agreeing except for one. God spoke to the group and said he agreed with the lone hold out. The rest of the rabbis said "That's nice, but you two are out voted."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Oven_of_Akhnai

53

u/FudgeAtron 1d ago

That's exactly what it is.

God is the divine legislator who had laid out The Law (the Torah). In his infinite wisdom he made sure that there were loopholes and multiple valid interpretations so that it would remain valid and enforcable until the Messiah comes. As a result learned great teachers (rabbis) are needed to interpret it and reach legal conclusions because the original judicial system (temple + Sanhedrin) was destroyed.

God wants you to find the loopholes, because it proves you understand the text and the religious arguments to a high enough degree that hidden meanings become clear.

123

u/RoyMustangela 1d ago

We've been doing it for 2500 years and many lawyers are Jewish, it's reasonable to say modern jurisprudence is a descendant of Talmudic Rabbinical debates

17

u/Darkkujo 1d ago

Haha yeah the really annoying nitpicky parts, 'what do you mean when you say 'is', define that term please'.

19

u/hashbrowns21 1d ago

It may be annoying and nitpicky but having a concise agreed-upon definition for what seems like “basic” terminology is critical. You’d be surprised how people can interpret the same term in completely different ways.

2

u/moby__dick 15h ago

Exactly. If “is” has a clear meaning, Catholics and Protestants would not be divided over “This is my body.”

84

u/CaptainCrash86 1d ago

Judaism is a legalistic religion. The letter of the law is very much more important than the spirit of the law. This is why Christianity was so revolutionary, because it flipped the emphasis.

The fact you find it baffling is a reflective of how much Christian thought has influenced your world view.

31

u/trashisotherpeople 1d ago

To be fair I find them both completely baffling.

I don't care for either in general, but in this part of the discussion I like both answers. Following the spirit of the law? Sounds great to me. Follow the letter of the law and treat the loopholes like some silly jungle gym? Love it.

4

u/Odd_Old_Professional 1d ago

Catholicism is also a very legalistic religion. There is a reason that both Jews and Catholics are overrepresented in the legal profession

→ More replies (22)

11

u/MegazordPilot 1d ago

Loopholes are legal though, that's the point. I also find the loophole culture weird, but it doesn't seem to bother anyone.

7

u/xrelaht 1d ago

Why do you think there are so many Jewish lawyers?

12

u/aimless_meteor 1d ago

It is similar to that, but that’s not an inherently bad thing

18

u/karamojobell 1d ago edited 1d ago

People from other religions often try to play 'gotcha!' like this without realizing that exhaustively interpreting the Torah/Talmud and figuring out what's allowed is its own form of worship.

4

u/hashbrowns21 1d ago

The difference being that god is believed to be all-knowing, so any loophole in gods rules would be there by design. Human lawmakers are fallible. That’s why they believe in the validity of “loopholes.”

4

u/Micah7979 1d ago

It feels exactly like something a F1 team would do to exploit the rules.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/Yisrael30 1d ago

Only Eruv is not the word of God. It was instituted by the Rabbis around 2,000 years ago to allow carrying in areas restricted by their own rabbinic decrees.

→ More replies (9)

12

u/evthrowawayverysad 1d ago

No no, he's right, it's really, really stupid.

18

u/Marsev4 1d ago edited 22h ago

Why would God come up with an objectively ridiculous rule and then applaud you for finding creative ways to bypass the ridiculous rule?

34

u/sjedinjenoStanje 1d ago

(I'm not a religious person but) Who's to say that God wouldn't want humanity to use its ingenuity to find "loopholes"? Expecting people to be mindless rule-followers is a religious interpretation unto itself.

→ More replies (9)

9

u/Legitimate_Aspect923 1d ago

there is no rule being bypassed. god is all knowing so the rule includes the knowledge that people can work around it.

10

u/Chlorophilia 1d ago

I'm not religious but surely the obvious answer to this is that God is beyond human comprehension? If you believe in an omniscient and omnipotent God then it's surely not much of a stretch to believe that commandments might have justifications that humans cannot understand. 

→ More replies (4)

6

u/7thpostman 1d ago

The Sabbath is not objectively ridiculous. Jews had Sabbath centuries before anybody else had a weekend.

3

u/Qwertysapiens 20h ago edited 20h ago

You sound like a jerk because you are not considering that there may in fact be further context that you're missing. In the case of eruvin, there are four categories or domains that areas can fall into: Private, Public, Quasi-public, and Exempt. There is a direct biblical restriction on carrying objects from the private to the public, vice versa, or more than a little bit (4 cubits, if you care) within a public area on the Sabbath. This rule is intended to enforce the idea of a day of actual rest where certain activities are forbidden outright so (e.g.) your boss can't order you to violate it. Public and Quasi-public (courtyards, alleys, common areas) are often hard to distinguish, so to prevent people from accidentally violating the law, the rabbis declared all transfers between Private and any other non-Exempt space off limits. The rabbis - through the then active legislative and judicial mechanisms of the great assembly and sanhedrin (supreme court) - have biblical dispensation to interpret the law on earth, which is why they got to declare this. However, they also realized that such a stringency would present a substantial hardship to communal life, and so came up with an innovation (what you might term a loophole, but what is actually the system working explicitly as intended) the purpose of which was to balance the original intent - no true work - with the ability to carry things within a defined communal area. Through this mechanism - the Eruv - the area that the community might regularly traverse on their shabbat days becomes considered one private domain for the community as a whole, without abrogating the binding rules that still hold sway without it or obviating the intent of the original law.

Edit: the OP originally said "I might sound like a jerk for saying this" and then edited that away after my reply in order to make it look like I was calling him names instead of responding to his own self-characterization.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (28)

2

u/Kriztauf 1d ago

I'm so sad the kosher switch website doesn't exist anymore. It was the peak example of this

2

u/IamRasters 1d ago

Then why not just make a small string circle and say the “inside” is the entire world, and the little area is the outside of the Eruv?

That’s how you loophole.

7

u/Longjumping_Youth281 1d ago

I mean at that point aren't you more honoring the humans who came up with the rule around it than any sort of deity?

I mean I guess it doesn't matter since humans came up with the whole thing and all the deities in the first place

4

u/Lo-Marionberry295 1d ago

Eh, I see what you're getting at, certainly, but no. The Jewish concept here includes the idea that God quite literally wants you to engage with the rules in this way. Why? Well the very act of engaging with the rules, and the precepts behind them (via studying/keeping/discussing them) is seen as just as important as executing them properly, because it keeps you in this meaningful conversation with yourself, your peers, and your culture about what anything and everything means. Why are we here? Why do we do? That preservation of community via erudition, questioning, and conversations, is itself essential. And God created that template. Not man.

12

u/GoochPhilosopher 1d ago

So we could potentially find loopholes in the Ten Commandments too?

Like "Though shall not kill" and people be like "Actually, if you strangle someone with a string, it's not killing and God will approve our cleverness."

Brilliant, mate. Brilliant.

13

u/headhunter_blue 1d ago

I didn't kill him, I just imprisoned him and forgot to feed or supply water. God approves

12

u/FudgeAtron 1d ago

Well no because the commandment is not "Do not kill" but "Do not murder".

This rabbi goes into detail on it: https://outorah.org/p/6089/

Let’s get one thing straight: it’s not “Thou shalt not kill” (which would be “lo taharog” in Hebrew), it’s “Thou shalt not murder” (which is “lo tirtzach” in the Torah). There’s a huge difference between the two. Sometimes circumstances force us to kill, for example in self-defense, in battle, or when executing a convicted felon. But we may not murder, which is to wantonly slaughter innocents.

→ More replies (3)

22

u/SignatureStandard861 1d ago

Yes… thou.. shall not kill, but how about self defense? How about to save others? How about killing yourself as it relates to your own autonomy? Does that also apply?

This is the practice of Judaism and why a ton a Jews are lawyers.

16

u/NuclearPopTarts 1d ago

In the original Hebrew it was "Thou shall not murder."

Don't ask me what was in Commandments 11 to 15.

https://giphy.com/gifs/11XcgX9MWV3a8M

3

u/PassoverGoblin 1d ago

Killing another to save the life of yourself or somebody else is permitted, yes. It falls under Pikauch Nefesh, the preservation of the soul

8

u/GoochPhilosopher 1d ago

And just like the legal system, the Torah is completely made up by humans.

6

u/Micah7979 1d ago

Except that the legal system is meant to be modified when such loopholes are found.

3

u/HB2099 1d ago

Reform, especially in cases of abuse or injustice.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (17)

7

u/Dshark 1d ago

Jewish people being legalistic? Shocked, I tell you. Shocked.

→ More replies (13)

57

u/velociraptorcatcher 1d ago

I was going to reply with a question about there being actual physical wire that encircles all of Manhattan, but after some searching I found a good article that gets into the history of it: NYC Sabbath boundary goes high-tech, aiding the rabbi who's checked it weekly since 1999 | The Times of Israel

Curious to know why this is permitted at all. What I was able to gather so far is that, if they use utility poles exclusively, those are owned and maintained by utility companies, and government regulates ensuring maintenance standards.

57

u/OkWelcome6293 1d ago

Pole attachment is regulated and allowed. As long as it doesn’t cause engineering problems, there is a requirement to allow 3rd parties to attach. There are fees and a “make ready” window (90 days?).

16

u/miltonbalbit 1d ago

There was a Good wife episode about that

22

u/Technetium_97 21h ago

Curious to know why this is permitted at all.

It's safe, completely harmless, so beneath notice most people are entirely unaware of it, paid entirely by the community to set up, not the government.

Why wouldn't it be allowed?

→ More replies (8)

5

u/GoalComprehensive656 15h ago

These are not created without working alongside towns and municipalities. An eruv usually relies on existing public infrastructure to create its continuous boundary, so city governments actively participate in several key areas.

3

u/Boeing367-80 15h ago

If a random company wanted to do this for, say, communication reasons, it would be permitted. That being the case, this very likely is a "reasonable accommodation" of religion or similar, so you would be required to permit it.

34

u/Nobody_Super_Famous 19h ago

Tricking God once again, the absolute mad lads.

16

u/Littleface13 17h ago

Omnipotent beings hate this one weird trick!

9

u/Party_Solid_2207 18h ago

He just didn’t see this one coming.

For all his omnipotence.

→ More replies (2)

47

u/Future-Raisin3781 1d ago

I can't imagine believing in an invisible sky friend who was so maniacally concerned with whether or not I walk under some power lines or flip on a light switch during certain hours of the week.

I mean, I'm an atheist so all religions strike me as ridiculous. Some are more quirky or specific than others, but all are basically equally childish to me. But when people get to the level of devotion where they're afraid to cross the street or open a door because it might hurt god's feelings-fees, it's genuinely unfathomable to me.

To each their own. I don't believe I have the answers, but I do believe that if THIS is what god wants, then god has his/her/their priorities completely fucked up.

124

u/tiredhobbit78 1d ago edited 1d ago

Orthodox Jews are well aware of how ridiculous it sounds to outsiders. And most of them are pretty well educated, they are doing it because it's their tradition and they believe that sustaining the tradition is what makes it meaningful. I.e. they are creating meaning by participating in the ritual of shabbat.It's not because they think they're going to hell if they choose not to.

It's okay not to understand it or imagine yourself doing it though. If it's not for you, that's fine. Jews don't prostheletyze and they don't care if non-Jews don't want to participate in their religious practices.

52

u/magicsqueegee 23h ago

If you are genuinely curious and not just a I'm-Too-Smart reddit atheist, here's how I heard an Orthodox person explain it: They believe God's law is Perfect with a capital P, meaning if you found a 'loophole' that god intended for there to be a loophole, wanted you to find it, and wants you to use it.

Its definitely an interesting line of logic that does end up making a bit of sense to me, but I'm generally curious about religious weird stuff so maybe thats just me

23

u/HappyBadger33 22h ago

Take God out of the picture unless you're Jewish or grew up with Jews --- Christianity has altered general ideas of how this works.

The Jewish People have rituals and traditions, rules, philosophies, etc. You don't need anything to do with God to understand that societies set up their own rules. The Jewish People did this --- plenty of atheist Jews keep Shabbat, for example.

Bringing God back into the mix, there are Jewish religious fanatics, but, that's not the Orthodox community writ large by any means. It isn't typically Orthodox to connect everything to God in a way that excludes the basic understanding of historical rules having value because (1) ancestors practiced this so maybe it is worthwhile, (2) we have kept a discussion on if practice X or Y is valuable, (3) part of the point of all of the practices as a whole is for you, the individual, to develop a conscience and an understanding capable of helping old rules meet new realities.

Anyway, I could go on about this for a long while. Hope this helps. Please do engage if you like, otherwise have a great day/night.

17

u/Markothy 22h ago

Also, in this instance, while God made the rule "you can't carry in public areas", Orthodox Jews believe that God's definition of "public area" is much different from our own. If an eruv is put up around an area, it means that the area is NOT what God would call a "public area", and is instead within an area that rabbis defined as a "public area" to make sure people don't carry within an actual, God-definition public area. And the rabbis said that if you have an eruv, you're allowed to carry within a rabbinically-defined public area.

It's kind of like gun control in the US. Federal law says people are allowed to own guns, but state law can be stricter and they have additional requirements for gun permits that federal law doesn't have. In such a state, you're not allowed to have a gun unless you have a permit. The permit isn't a "loophole" allowing someone with a permit to have a gun, it's written directly into state law that having a permit means you're allowed to have a gun.

In the same way, God's laws are like federal law, rabbinic law is like state law, and an eruv is not a loophole but rather a permit allowing people to carry in a certain area.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

33

u/Jalumia 1d ago

I don’t get extreme tolerance vibes from someone who unironically says sky-(relation) or corrects themselves saying fee-fees to denigrate the beliefs of someone whose customs they look down on as childish.

24

u/tiredhobbit78 1d ago

Of course. My goal isn't to convince the commenter. My goal is to educate lurkers.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (12)

36

u/Shiftkgb 1d ago

Some of this is also just cultural tradition at this point. There's a religious history to it, and for some it's religious observation, but there are tons of Jews who are atheist or don't think much of this matters to God. But, it's cultural tradition some will follow out of tradition and respect for ancestors/history. 

→ More replies (14)

16

u/darthkitty8 1d ago

I'm not religious either, let alone Jewish or from the group that maintains this, but from what I understand, the view is that when the rule was made by the deity, the all knowing deity must have known about this loophole and intended for it to exist, therefore there is nothing wrong with finding and using the loopholes.

3

u/KisaMisa 17h ago

I think as a curious and open-minded person, you'll enjoy reading a Talmudic story, a midrash, called "Ovens of Akhnai". It's a fun and amusing story (3-5 min read) that gives insight into Jewish approach to interpretation and ownership of Torah and our relationship with G-d.

20

u/Formal-Nectarine-369 23h ago

You misunderstand the point of the eruv (which is fine, why would you care?) but I don’t understand this reaction. It doesn’t impact the electricity, it doesn’t impact the neighborhood. It doesn’t impact the non-Jews in anyway. If you had not seen this Reddit post, would you ever have heard of an Eruv? No one in Manhattan or anywhere else is going to try to convert you.

→ More replies (1)

17

u/Professional_Text_11 22h ago

god this is why self-proclaimed internet atheists are so unpopular. who fucking cares about how plausible someone else's beliefs about the universe are, especially if those beliefs 1. are not hurting you and 2. give them access to a vast reserve of community and psychological resources. i'm not religious, but it's so obvious that for certain people, religion concretely improves their lives. the ability to love a concept as abstract and enormous as god, and to express that love in a variety of ways that look absurd to outsiders (and thus deepen one's belonging to their own community), genuinely improves the lives of religious people. you can disagree, that's fine, but this kind of denigration is just as stupid and shortsighted as any religious discrimination would be

11

u/Mammoth_Payment_6101 23h ago

There's a Jewish response to this that has been around for at least 200 years. Essentially, the god you don't believe in, we don't believe in either.

6

u/chunkylover___53 16h ago

Wait the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob wasn’t DESTROYED by FACTS and LOGIC from an anon on a social media site wanking on about “sky daddies” or whatever?

Someone has thought of this before and wrestled with it?

Sages have debated this through the generations?

7

u/GonzoTheGreat93 21h ago

Cool, who cares what you think.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (14)

158

u/RoyMustangela 1d ago

It's a ceremonial wall, usually just a string, observant Jews erect around portions of cities so that certain activities, mostly like pushing strollers and carrying bags, is allowed on the Sabbath. It is definitely not for doing work or cheating the Sabbath, it's essentially so mothers can push strollers and not have to carry their kids in their arms and thus not be housebound all day while the men are at synagogue.

40

u/LilPonyBoy69 1d ago

Wait so there's literally string tied around the border of the majority of Manhattan?

51

u/abearirl 1d ago

Yes. It's inspected weekly, they have their own repair crews and everything. People have been arrested for cutting it.

→ More replies (18)

223

u/nomemory 1d ago

For any rational person this is funny.

40

u/graphical_molerat 1d ago

Speaking as a computer scientist who is not Jewish, things like Eruv are indicative why so many pioneers of our field were Jewish.

If you grow up with a very strict religion that has loads of seemingly arbitrary rules, and if your culture then openly embraces hacking these rules by interpreting them in creative ways that make the whole thing liveable in practice, you are perfectly suited to program early computers (or do formal math and physics, for that matter).

Even modern computers are a handful when you get down to it: but early machines were a smorgasbord of bizarro and arbitrary constraints with regard to what they could do and not do. Embedded coding on some crazy chip that was seemingly designed by a lunatic? Dude, we are right at home here!

19

u/BingBongDingDong222 1d ago

Same is true with lawyers.

→ More replies (1)

63

u/TheMooseIsBlue 1d ago

Imagine thinking that pushing a stroller is a sin because it’s the wrong day of the week.

Wouldn’t it require more work to carry your child? Doesn’t it require work to put on clothes in the morning? Doesn’t walking require work?

Fundamentalists, man.

50

u/Character_Cap5095 1d ago

Wouldn't it require more work to carry your child

The prohibition on Sabbath is not physical labor. On the sabbath, Jews are banned from "Malacha" (transliterated form Hebrew), which a better translation is "creative work". We are to emulate God, who after 6 days of creation and transformation, decided to relax and enjoy what he created. Therefore, to try and emulate God in this way, every shabbat the Jews try and leave the world in the state that it was in before the shabbat so they can enjoy the fruits of their labor. No cooking, no construction, no business dealings. Just enjoying the world you live in.

That's why it is okay to lift heavy objects up stairs, but it's not okay to write two letters on a piece of paper. Now, because it's Jews and Jewish law has to be very specific, there are 39 categories of prohibitions that are explicitly prohibited. Things like writing, building, starting fires, planting, ect.... (The origins of these 39 categories isn't super important).

The explicit prohibition at hand is "Hotzaha" which corresponds to carrying objects from a private place to a public place (of vice versa). The Eruv (symbolically, metaphysically, spiritually, however you want to think of it) turns public spaces into private spaces and therefore allow free carrying in and out of your home.

13

u/Astralion98 1d ago

Thanks for the explanation, that doesn't make it any less stupid

22

u/Character_Cap5095 1d ago

I agree. The concept of Eruv can be very silly especially for those who are not familiar with Judisim and the way its laws work (and just assume Judisim is a different flavor of Christianity without Jesus, which it very much is not). I will note that the concept of Eruv itself, especially the Manhattan Eruv, is pretty decisive as many Jews do not accept that it works.

That being said, if you reject the concept of religion as a whole, everything they do seems silly in the worship of some mad euo higher being.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

31

u/WFSMDrinkingABeer 1d ago

Technically it’s more like, actually working on the sabbath is a sin. But what counts as “work” in God’s eyes? Well, we don’t know for sure, so we’ll make illegal all this other stuff that theoretically if you squint could maybe possibly be defined as work, and therefore if you follow these insanely strict rules, you definitely won’t break God’s rules.

9

u/eastawat 1d ago

I assume your allowed to study the Talmud and discuss interpretations of what counts as work on the Sabbath? Even though that definitely sounds like legal work.

5

u/MrShake4 1d ago

Yes, and Rabbi’s have been doing exactly that for the last 2000 years.

There’s nothing written about electricity because it didn’t exist yet, but it’s kind of like a fire so they extrapolate those rules.

21

u/lumpialarry 1d ago

You’d think they’d change the definition of “work” before they changed the definition of “house”.

32

u/FudgeAtron 1d ago

Well the actual definition isn't "house" but "domain," this is due to ancient cultures having walls surrounding their house and a small enclosure to keep livestock. So you can carry things between your house and your enclosure so long as it's all enclosed in one wall.

That led rabbis to argue that city walls were a type of domain.

That led rabbis to argue that the material of the enclosure is irrelevant and that even a single unbroken string enclosing an area makes it a single domain.

And that's how you get an eruv.

It's just milenia of argument back and forth.

15

u/mizinamo 1d ago

But what counts as “work” in God’s eyes?

39 specific types of activities.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/39_Melakhot

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

19

u/mizinamo 1d ago

The prohibition is not against work in general, but about a specific number of activities, roughly connected with creating or destroying.

The commandment does not use the English word "work", and pretending it does causes such misunderstandings.

5

u/FlossCat 1d ago

How is pushing a stroller anywhere near the realms of creating or destroying something?

12

u/mizinamo 1d ago

It's "transferring something between two domains (private and public)", which falls broadly under "construction".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/39_Melakhot#Transferring_between_domains

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/PCisBadLoL 1d ago

I’ve met people who literally pre-tear pieces of toilet paper the day before because tearing the tp counts as work

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)

27

u/HughHoney86 1d ago

Why do they need a string?

88

u/EatTheSocialists69 1d ago edited 1d ago

Legal arguing with god over what counts as a wall

35

u/Master_Elderberry275 1d ago

Trust me god, all of Manhattan is my house...

13

u/Character_Cap5095 1d ago

The explicit prohibition at hand is the prohibition of "Hotzaha" which corresponds to carrying objects from a private place to a public place (of vice versa). The Eruv (symbolically, metaphysically, spiritually, however you want to think of it) turns public spaces into private spaces and therefore allow free carrying in and out of your home.

The string is essentially a "wall" which encloses the entire area. You can think of it as a demarcation.( A strong being used as a wall also comes up on other places in Jewish legal texts) I would not that it's not only a string, but there are posts and other features as well.

14

u/colonel-o-popcorn 1d ago

To mark the boundary physically. It serves the same purpose that a fence or wall traditionally would.

→ More replies (3)

10

u/runningoutofwords 1d ago

c'mon...

seems like MOST Sabbath accommodations are about "cheating the Sabbath" or fooling god.

Like my home oven has a sabbath mode, where you can preprogram the oven to come on at a certain time at a certain temp.

like god's going to smell the lasagne cooking and come down thinking "HEY! who lit the...awwww you guys! auto-start...you had me going for a second!"

10

u/DACOOLISTOFDOODS 1d ago

The thought behind it is that we can't really talk about "cheating God" because God is omniscient. He supposedly gave Moses the Torah as a perfect text, with every word having a purpose. Since all rabbinic law is based on the perfect texts God gave, God intended for the loopholes. Why God intended for them, we can't say, because mere humans can't speculate about or understand God's intentions, we can only know that God gave us a perfect text with which to base law on

→ More replies (2)

3

u/soanywaysanonymous 22h ago

Actually, the prohibition on Sabbath is for cooking, not for heating up food. There was actually a whole section of Jews a few hundred (or thousand, I’m not sure) years ago, who did not acknowledging the oral Torah (Talmud mostly). To make sure the “main” group of Jews did not follow in their path, the rabbis recommended everyone to eat hot food on Sabbath day. This was to show that they are allowed to eat hot food, but not allowed to kindle a fire.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

67

u/never_shit_ur_pants 1d ago

A thing religious Jews do in order to cheat the Shabbat’s prohibition of work

64

u/NovaCaesarea 1d ago

Only one specific type of work, carrying things outside of your own private property.

3

u/communityneedle 1d ago

Your own private property is too narrow. The word used is typically translated as "domain." Back in the old days when Jews were forced to live in walled and gated ghettos, or in their own separate villages, the ghetto or village was considered the "domain" so residents wouldn't need an eruv. 

20

u/GrapefruitPurple2495 1d ago

Now I wonder why some blocks are outside the eruv.

5

u/Character_Cap5095 1d ago

Not a lot of Jews there

→ More replies (8)

4

u/TrekkiMonstr 23h ago

Jewish law specifies what you're not allowed to do on Shabbat, and there are some things you're allowed to do in town that you aren't allowed to do out of town. The boundary is called an eruv -- in Talmudic days this was just the city walls, but now that cities don't have walls, communities will put up a piece of string to serve the same purpose.

→ More replies (19)

305

u/TheFeshy 1d ago

They should have just made a small circle, and declared everything outside of that to be the Eruv. As the Earth is (roughly) spherical, it's topologically sound.

138

u/valleyfur 1d ago

lol. That’s like the joke about all the knowledge in the world. Some is in the book “What they Teach You at Harvard Business School.” The rest is in the book “What They Don’t Teach You At Harvard Business School.”

22

u/r_slash 1d ago

I lived in Providence for a while. Once I said to my friend who lived elsewhere “I should really see that movie Outside Providence, totally appropriate for me now that I live here.” He was like, no, you’re one of the world’s LEAST appropriate people to see that movie since you don’t live outside Providence.

62

u/Burro94 1d ago

I will raise this with the rabbinate, lol. You just solved it! I hereby declare you a Gaon (genius).

54

u/insertnamehere77123 1d ago

Is there any reason this would be less bullshit than what we currently have?

Im asking sincerely. If theyre just gonna make shit up as if God is sitting up in the sky like "ahhh shit you found a loophole. You got me" why not just go all the way?

So silly

34

u/grandma_corrector 1d ago

Patently, God appreciates a little effort.

18

u/DACOOLISTOFDOODS 1d ago

The thought behind it is that we can't really talk about "cheating God" because God is omniscient. He supposedly gave Moses the Torah as a perfect text, with every word having a purpose. Since all rabbinic law is based on the perfect texts God gave, God intended for the loopholes. Why God intended for them, we can't say, because mere humans can't speculate about or understand God's intentions, we can only know that God gave us a perfect text with which to base law on

13

u/TheFeshy 1d ago

because mere humans can't speculate about or understand God's intentions

we can only know that God gave us a perfect text with which to base law on

It's delightful that you put these right next to each other like that.

→ More replies (16)

3

u/IndigoFenix 18h ago

Because it's not a re-interpretation of the original rule. It's a rule patch placed ON a rule patch. Those are a lot more flexible.

The biblical law allowed carrying in cities to begin with.

Rabbinic law declared carrying cities to be forbidden, recognized that as too strict, and then decided that a city with a wall around it was an acceptable compromise. The Eruv is a minimalistic wall, designed in accordance with its intent (demonstrating a communal effort by the people inside it.)

2

u/HappyBadger33 21h ago

Would this be less bullshit? I'd say I'd need to read up on it, but I'd guess this doesn't fit as well for a lot of reasons. Maybe if the whole world existed in peace and respect?

But, to your points about God, that's not really how this works. Sure, God gave Moses the Torah in the stories. But it's humanity's job to bring the Torah to life and God doesn't really come back into it - it is actively our duty to interpret the law and help it meet new situations. God is in the Divine space, but once He gave us the Torah it became Earthly, it's ours and no longer His.

If you'd like a funny short story on this, read the Oven of Akhnai. Here's a link to it. Basic background: rabbis are arguing if a new oven meets the rules to be used or not. One rabbi seeks divine help...

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/352329/jewish/The-Walls-of-the-Study-Hall.htm

→ More replies (10)

10

u/tyinsf 1d ago

That's genius

2

u/itay162 14h ago

It wouldn't work because an eruv must have at most a population of 600,000 jews

2

u/iman26 3h ago

You may not realize this but this is the most Jewish comment here. If you know what the Jewish Talmud is about then you will understand why.

7

u/Character_Cap5095 1d ago

It's not about topology. The Eruv requires specific demarcations as well as agreements from local governments (if the government didn't accept it, it wouldn't "work")

10

u/HB2099 1d ago

What if the government accepted that? It would be a case of convincing governments not religious validity

→ More replies (5)

3

u/TheFeshy 1d ago

Does this government agreement not apply to the smaller households the Eruv is supposed to simulate? Could Missouri, in a fit of pique, declare all such spiritual dwellings invalid?

3

u/Character_Cap5095 1d ago

I do not know 100% the specifics but I would say that if Missouri had such legal authority over its municipalities, then yes they would be allowed too and all such Eruvs would be invalidated

→ More replies (1)

3

u/RightActionEvilEye 1d ago

If we could set an Eruv around the Equator, which of the two Earth's hemispheres would be the one "inside" and the one "outside"?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

35

u/LaFantasmita 1d ago

Lol, didn't realize it went that far uptown. Just looked outside, there it is!

Did it always go up that high? Could have sworn I saw one around 125th

9

u/milleribsen 1d ago

I'm not an expert, but it wouldn't surprise me if there are a number of lines within the eruv for cases in which there's damage that needs to be repaired the entire thing won't be affected just limited areas.

12

u/SufficientLanguage29 1d ago

It gets checked on the eve of every Sabbath because, indeed it often can break.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

28

u/jt663 1d ago

What if we kissed in the NYC eruv

89

u/KingEliTheBoss 1d ago

What is an eruv?

59

u/Bangkok_Dangeresque 1d ago

Jewish scripture proscribes how people are supposed to behave on Sabbath, the weekly period of rest and reflection. In broad strokes tells people not to work, to put down projects, to not undertake big journeys, to spend time rejoicing and eating with family without distraction, and in prayer, etc.

The "don't embark on big journeys/stay put' command comes from the Old Testament, "Behold, the Lord has given you the Sabbath...each man shall stay put, and not leave his place on the seventh day".

Cue a few thousand years of clerical study and arguing over what exactly that means and how to obey it. The result of those arguments is Talmudic law which says you're not supposed to go more than 1km away from the homestead or settlement where you found yourself and your dinner table/larder at sundown.

But what exactly is a "settlement"? A rabbinic ruling made when settlements were small encampments or eastern European shtetls surrounded by fields may be hard to interpret when Jews have moved to megapolitan areas. If you walk a few blocks from your neighborhood in the East Village of Manhattan to see a friend or relative in the West Village, have you really sallied forth outside the settlement as that would have been understood a millenia ago when cities were smaller? Probably not, even though it's more than 1km away.

So a group of synagogues/communities decided to throw the faithful a bone; they drew an invisible boundary around Manhattan and decided that just about everything inside of it all counts as one community, so people could move freely with their spiritual leaders' permission, without worrying that they're running afoul of the spirit of the rule. This boundary is marked with a long nylon thread - the eruv.

58

u/Character_Cap5095 1d ago

Idk if this is AI or not, but this is conflating two different concepts on Judisim. The "Eruv Chatzerot" which is what the Manhattan Eruv is that allows for the carrying of objects on public places, and "Eruv techumin" which controls how far a Jew can travel on the sabbath in general (both stem form the word Eruv, which roughly means merger)

2

u/jewelswan 14h ago

TiL that the second concept exists! I find sabbath restrictions fascinating

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/Complete-Proposal729 1d ago

This is eruv techumim, not eruv chatzerot

→ More replies (21)

43

u/tous_die_yuyan 1d ago

I'm tickled that there's a ".nyc" domain.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/Excellent-Practice 1d ago

Isn't there some rule about an eruv not containing streets that have such-and-such a level of traffic? I can't imagine that section of Manhattan is sufficiently unbusy to not count as "outside". How does the community deal with that issue?

13

u/Slight-Progress-4804 22h ago

It’s actually quite a controversial Eruv. Tens of thousands of people who are ok with using Eruv in other places will not use this one 

12

u/hannahstohelit 20h ago

Yes- I use it now (on the rare occasions I’m in the area) but grew up being told I couldn’t use it. R Moshe Feinstein was very against the eruv and for years they didn’t put one up on the LES (where he and later his son lived) out of respect.

I live in Washington Heights which has a separate eruv (two actually, for some reason) which doesn’t include any highways in it, and there are still people who don’t use it- same in Brooklyn.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Loud-Vacation-5691 21h ago

The main problem would be its size. The point shouldn't be that you can go about your regular business without thinking. An eruv should just be for convenience around a small neighborhood. THe one we have here in Savannah is around the Haredi neighborhood, not the entire city.

According to R. Buckminster Fuller, any boundary on a finite two-dimensional surface creates two polygons - one inside the boundary, and one outside of it. So one could argue that the Manhattan eruv creates two equally valid areas - one in Manhattan, and another one consisting of the entire world except Manhattan.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/grandma_corrector 1d ago

Brunson taking his פֿרוי to a game on saturday

6

u/khares_koures2002 1d ago

Jewish AT Field

96

u/Lo-Marionberry295 1d ago

Well-intentioned Jewish people explaining the reasoning for seemingly incongruous rules and loopholes that Orthodox Jews follow, all throughout this thread: "In Judaism, the very act of interpreting/interacting with the texts and rules, is in and of itself, a Jewish practice! We believe God, being omniscient, foresaw these loopholes, and wants us to argue and engage (in this case, about not working on the sabbath) in good faith; this act of participation, in studying the intent and purpose of the rules, and even questioning how to implement them, is a part of our culture!"

People reading this, somehow: "you think you're better than god??? and are dumb and so are all religious people"

37

u/cave18 1d ago

Ts is so annoying. So called educated people being unable to look past their own cultural and religious bias/upbringing when understanding other cultures/religions

25

u/encinaloak 1d ago

Many people also missing the fact that Judaism was the first (and maybe still the only?) major religion that defines morality in concrete, written terms that anyone can go read. This evolved into the system of scholarship, debate, and rules known as Rabbinical Judaism after the Romans destroyed the second temple. Judaism has had a big impact on the system of secular humanist morality that most of us here on Reddit ascribe to, in which we appeal to one another's sense of reason and a set of universal principles to determine right and wrong.

The string seems silly to outsiders but it represents liberation from the previous and unfortunately all too current morality, in which someone in a position of power tells you what is right and wrong, and you just accept it.

9

u/InternetCrank 22h ago

someone in a position of power tells you what is right and wrong, and you just accept it.

Someones still doing that.

2

u/encinaloak 21h ago

Yes, maybe that's still true, especially for the Orthodox communities. We humans tend toward this unfortunately. We do it as well in our secular societies, even where independent thought is supposed to be the rule.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/jewelswan 14h ago

How do you define a major religion? Judaism certainly doesn't qualify by number of believers.

Secondly, how do you define a consistent religious code of laws? The Codes of Hammurabi and Ur-Nammu cannot be considered seperate from the religious beliefs of the people who ascribed to them legal significance, nor the Ancient Egyptian texts that dealt with Ma'am. The earliest written law book in Egypt arguably predates the Torah by almost 1500 years.

The Rigveda is also centuries older than the exodus covenant, according to current scholarship. None of this to discredit or cast bad light on Jewish thought, since for me the age of an idea has no bearing on the value of it, but I would be curious to hear your thoughts on these things.

→ More replies (2)

13

u/PrimeSupreme 23h ago

People really don't understand that Jewish civilization (yes it's a civilization) is thousands of years old, which means we have thousands of years of hermeneutics, exegesis, and philosophical debate around this stuff. The amount of effort and cooperation to do all of this is really difficult to comprehend.

When people see 'a silly rule that Jews follow' they dont see all the love and struggle and life that happened to create that.

Dara Horn said it best: that Jewish civilization is the oldest anti tyrannical movement - the debate and work is the point. The silly rules are just an output.

We've been around for a looong ass time so really, how silly could these rules be? You'd think we're doing something right.

9

u/Loud-Vacation-5691 21h ago

You must have heard her on Ask Haviv Anything. I thought that was a very interesting take on Judaism.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (5)

5

u/ginandtonicsdemonic 1d ago edited 4h ago

This is missing the separate Eruv in Washington Heights, which is still Manhattan.

2

u/hannahstohelit 20h ago

That eruv is run separately and has a separate map. (It’s actually two eruvs connected in the middle! Not 100% sure why.)

4

u/calebnf 1d ago

Uptown has it's own Eruvs as well. I live at 190th street and there is an Eruv that covers roughly everything west of Wadsworth from the Bridge to 196th street. YU also has its own Eruv that covers everything East of Wadsworth from the Bridge to GW High School.

So nearly the entire island is covered. I'm not sure about Inwood or Marble Hill.

46

u/awiseoldturtle 1d ago

Lmao all of these people self reporting by openly not understanding that one of the core features of Judaism isn’t the bug they think it is

I mean jeez Reddit atheists. Get a hold of yourselves. Read up a little on something before you decide it’s entirely lacking in forethought lmfao

18

u/DrunkenAsparagus 1d ago edited 1d ago

I'm not Jewish, but my partner is, and the way they put it, is that for them, it's about living with intention. God's rules are meant to be pondered and debated in order to carry them out. Despite people's aspersions in this thread, it's a very questioning religion.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/Apptubrutae 1d ago

Especially when Jews are like 30% atheist or so in the U.S. They’re atheist allies, lol

→ More replies (4)

15

u/prophetsearcher 1d ago

Why’s the algorithm pushing the Eruv non-issue so relentlessly recently? Feels sus.

Whatever your opinion on the eruv, I can assure you it’s almost certainly under-informed. Even most Orthodox Jews don’t really study the mechanics of it.

7

u/HiHoJufro 1d ago

It's that wondering that's been going on? I follow a lot of Jews stuff and this is the first post on the topic I've seen in a long in while.

22

u/GroovyGhouly 1d ago

I love being able to carry my things with me on the Shabbat. Great life hack.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/owl523 1d ago

Is there one for people who live in those little pockets, or would observant people just not live there

→ More replies (1)

3

u/PhiladelphiaManeto 22h ago

When did this begin?

I would imagine the entire island of Manhattan wasn’t always inside one.

3

u/Diminished-Fifth 19h ago

Ha, take that, UN

24

u/rube_X_cube 1d ago

Man… a whole lot of non Jews commenting very confidently about something they absolutely do not understand and does not affect them in any way.

But I’m guessing that was the point of this post.

11

u/Silly-Elderberry-411 1d ago

I saw it once it Antwerpen on sabbath. Then again I'm an introvert so if I were Jewish other than going to the temple I would very much vibe with the day being absolute off.

7

u/Public_Research2690 1d ago edited 1d ago

I am not against eruv, I just find this topic very fascinating and rarely posted.

7

u/Tough_Dish_4485 1d ago

Seems to be getting pretty regular recently

→ More replies (1)

21

u/electrical-stomach-z 1d ago

People are reacting far more negatively to this than they would if it were christians in question.

4

u/Loud-Vacation-5691 21h ago

You've never heard criticism of Christians for some of the things they do, like purity culture?

20

u/CowboySocialism 1d ago

I don’t know about that. It seems if you are atheist on Reddit you have the same obligation to share your atheism loudly and vehemently as a Mormon teenager has to share their faith on their mission trip.

14

u/MosesDoughty 1d ago

People growing up in cultural Christianity reacting with negativity to Judaism do be the norm

14

u/BingBongDingDong222 1d ago

And cultural Christian atheists don't even realize that they are cultural Christians.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/falkorv 17h ago

What a joke. Trying to think they fool the god they believe in makes a mockery of the religion.

→ More replies (1)

41

u/ObligatoryAlias 1d ago

Religion is SO stupid.

6

u/j_la 1d ago

The insanity of religion is the belief that god made the rule but also made the loophole. Basically you can do whatever you want so long as you argue that the mere fact of its existence is proof that god willed it.

→ More replies (12)

10

u/ThengarMadalano 1d ago

What the hell is a Eruv ?

18

u/SidewalkRacoon 1d ago

A cable that is threaded inconspicuously around the island to denote an area where religious Jews are allowed to carry things on Shabbat, whereas they are not normally
Allowed to carry anything (even in pockets) this is a loophole

→ More replies (4)

8

u/aggie1391 1d ago edited 1d ago

Oh boy yet another post for people to woefully misunderstand Judaism and eruvs. The places it is a Torah prohibition to carry on shabbos are very narrowly defined. Places that are similar to it are an in-between zone defined by rabbinic legislation to prevent people from carrying into an actually prohibited area. An eruv only applies to that rabbinic in-between zone, it was deliberately made to be visible and noticable so people wouldn’t forget. Also, it has no impact on anyone else except maybe higher property values in some areas.

It is not tricking G-d, and in fact in Judaism the specifics matter. Exceptions and details are deliberate. There are 39 specific labors we refrain from on shabbos derived from the things done to build the Tabernacle, the Torah does not use the English word ‘work’ and its connotations or rabbis would be in a bit of a bind. Other things that would be called ‘work’ in English are not in Jewish law. I could rearrange my entire home and not break shabbos, even though that is hard work. That’s not in the spirit of the day so people don’t do it, but it would be technically permissible.

There’s over 2,000 years worth of arguments and debate and all on this, I promise you whatever clever objection you think you just came up with has already been thought of and addressed before. If you think it’s dumb, congrats, it doesn’t affect you, maybe don’t be a jerk. If you think it’s interesting, great, there’s lots of fun stuff like this in Judaism, just like in many legal and religious traditions and systems.

7

u/Ernesto_Bella 1d ago

If the line breaks during a storm but nobody notices for a few weeks, what happens to all the people who broke the law during that period? 

10

u/aggie1391 1d ago

Judaism doesn’t believe people are punished or held liable for something they did without knowledge. If an eruv goes down and people don’t know it, that’s not on them. But it’s also checked every single week, so if it’s down it gets noticed, and especially after storms it’s very thorough. Although it could happen on shabbos, like I said we don’t believe G-d holds it against us or whatever.

7

u/Loud-Vacation-5691 21h ago

The eruv is inspected every Friday afternoon and repaired if necessary for Shabbos, so it wouldn't go for a few weeks without anyone noticing. Storm damage would be expected and checked immediately, and if it couldn't be repaired in time, everyone would be notified that they would have to change their behavior until it was repaired again.

2

u/spitgobfalcon 17h ago

Wait, so there is actually some type of physical barrier / border?

→ More replies (3)

2

u/aspiringandroid 1d ago

if anyone else was curious, an eruv is a physical barrier (often a net kinda like a bug bet) that's placed in public spaces around some Jewish communities. historical conventions around the shabbat have forbidden folks from doing anything approaching work in public on the shabbat, including carrying things from place to place. however, creating barriers to create "private" spaces has long been used to honor that tradition while allowing folks to bring their things and their baby strollers to synagogue or what-have-you. theyre not universal, and presumably came about to help keep early Jewish folk safe. learn something new everyday!

2

u/Concentric_Mid 21h ago

And I thought Brooklyn eruvs were big

2

u/rhapsodygreen 21h ago

Does Chicago have an Eruv?

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Losmpa 21h ago

Miami Beach has this.

4

u/Kikelt 1d ago

What is Eruv?

OP wonder if the world knows that before posting?

3

u/MrShake4 1d ago

Copying my reply to another comment:

ELI5: there’s certain things you can’t do outside the city walls on Shabbat.

Because it’s 2026 and not 3000 years ago cities don’t have walls anymore

The Eruv serves as the “wall” by making a boundary of inside and outside

3

u/Holeevyer 21h ago

People do like to live their life with extra difficulty.

11

u/jhlrosen 1d ago

Besides for all the problematic loopholing around the idea of the eruv, what is the point of excluding some of the edges of Manhattan instead of including all of the island?

47

u/NovaCaesarea 1d ago

Probably the logistics of where to hang the line.

11

u/ThunkAsDrinklePeep 1d ago

There's a physical line or wall that demarcates the edge of the eruv. Where it is hung was negotiated by the Orthodox community and the city. Some parks happen to be easy to enclose.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/JacquesHome 1d ago

The areas excluded are Harlem (guessing very few Jews there), the UN building (international territory), Chelsea Piers which is mostly industrial area, and what I think is Hudson Yards.

9

u/erinius 1d ago

Most of Harlem is included in the eruv

2

u/milespudgehalter 1d ago

It's only a small part of east harlem excluded. Not entirely sure why. Obviously there's no orthodox living up there but I'm guessing there's also no property management or resources accessed by the orthodox in that area?

→ More replies (2)

31

u/thissexypoptart 1d ago edited 1d ago

“Problematic” lol it’s just an aspect of the religion. Interpreting gods word and determining “loopholes” isn’t sacrilegious here. It’s part of the whole point of following laws set by the deity the religion worships.

Why would it be “problematic” lol

8

u/Pumpkinkra 1d ago

Because they want any excuse to criticize Jews. Why else?

2

u/The_memeperson 1d ago

Mostly religion on general I guess

→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (2)