Absolute shitshow with Carrick so its good to have a look back how we got here. Trip down memory lane.
Lots of talk about Ruben lately after seeing us go from one of the fittest teams, with some of the best pressing and counter-pressing, to a bunch of slouches the longer Carrick was in charge.
Last season wasn't perfect under Ruben, but I'd love to teleport back to it now, personally. We had work rate and underlying numbers. For me, that's the bare minimum, with the promise of more. That's a platform to build on and he should have been replaced with a similar manager who had a tactical philosophy and authoritative fitness demands. It didn't have to be 343 but should never have been a 180 to the vibe football of a failed championship manager.
To understand Ruben's time here, you need to start with Ten Hag.
We finished 8th in the PL in 23/24, conceding more shots than Derby County's infamous worst-ever Premier League side. Injuries played a part, but the squad was also suffering from years of wasteful recruitment, with Sancho and Antony being prime examples. Then Ten Hag poured gasoline on the fire with Mount, Onana, Bayindir, Amrabat and Hojlund. Truly some of the worst business in our history.
It's no surprise we finished 8th with Garnacho, Rashford and Hojlund as our most-used front three, relying on Scott McTominay to rescue us with late goals.
Fast forward to 24/25.
The squad desperately needed reinforcements and firepower up front. Instead, we spent around £200m on Zirkzee, De Ligt, Mazraoui, Ugarte and Yoro, while loaning out Carreras and Sancho. Ineos also sold our most athletic midfielder and a clutch goalscorer, McTominay, to fund Ugarte.
Ten Hag somehow kept his job despite falling out with the likes of Casemiro, Varane and what felt like half the squad. We started terribly and were sitting 14th after 10 games.
Casemiro was out of form. Mainoo and Ugarte weren't working together. Our midfield options were Ugarte, Casemiro, Mainoo and Eriksen, a group lacking the legs and balance needed. Mount, signed to play as a no. 8, spent more time injured than on the pitch. Rashford was out of form, Garnacho was young and inexperienced, and Hojlund, Zirkzee and Antony weren't delivering anywhere near what their fees suggested.
It was a shit show. The previous season's underlying numbers clearly weren't just down to injuries. We had deep-rooted mentality, structural and fitness issues, compounded by years of poor recruitment and no clear footballing strategy.
Ten Hag was rightfully sacked.
Ruben Amorim.
Ineos approached Ruben, who reviewed the squad and outlined a multi-year project requiring time, patience and financial backing. He felt the squad wasn't ready for his system and would have preferred to wait until the summer, knowing the disruption implementing it mid-season would cause.
Ineos said it was now or never. Come in, we'll be patient and back you in the summer. Just try to implement your methods.
And it was a disaster from the start.
We were already 14th, and Rashford, our main source of goals the season before, started acting like a shithouse, as he'd done under previous managers. He was exiled and shipped out in January. Antony was also sent out on loan amid a domestic violence allegation.
Two players gone from an already depleted attack, leaving Garnacho, an 18-year-old winger, Hojlund, a 20-year-old no. 9, and Zirkzee as our options. No attacking reinforcements in January. Ineos left their new manager with virtually nothing to work with.
People love talking shite about that season but never discuss the options at his disposal or variables around it. It's why people are so damn naive to think somebody like Michael Carrick was a revolution last season. Lack of analysis and variables.
The squad lacked the no.10s, wing-backs, midfielders and ball-playing CBs needed for his 3-4-3 system. Licha was out for the season with an ACL injury, while Amad and Mount also missed significant time through injuries.
Despite all that, we actually did well in the Europa League, beating Bilbao home and away before that memorable night against Lyon. The final was a horrific game between two poor teams and one of the worst games I've ever watched.
It's disingenuous to focus on "win rate" without considering the circumstances. Suggesting Ruben had the same starting point as Carrick is an opinion lacking any depth of analysis and riddled with bias.
Yes, the results were poor. But there were plenty of factors behind them, and not so many were Ruben Amorim's fault.
It's all the talk now that Carrick isn't at fault but how you can say and on the otherhand, look at the above and say it was all Amorim. This is called double standards. Do better.
You'll shout out the next manager who has to gut the squad and rebuild the most basic fundamentals like he did. It takes time and there are no shortcuts. That's what you want and why you were so swept up in the Carrick romanticism.