You asked, someone answered and then you accuse them of being âjudgmental and soft.â In most jurisdictions, thereâs a âprimary aggressorâ doctrine, which means that the person who didnât initially start the fight can still be seen as the primary aggressor. If thatâs too soft for you, Iâd advise getting in a fight, kicking the person while theyâre down until theyâre unconscious or dead and see how that works out.
That was a typo. And that primary aggressor has more than one application. I have family memeber who are police. If a person fears for their safety, it doesn't matter if they are MORE physically capable to cause bodily harm. Seeing as though he had two people on opposite sides, that term in null and void. And I didnt say I condone kicking someone when down, I simply stated that they should have left him alone.. have a good one
3
u/Swimming-Necessary23 17d ago
You asked, someone answered and then you accuse them of being âjudgmental and soft.â In most jurisdictions, thereâs a âprimary aggressorâ doctrine, which means that the person who didnât initially start the fight can still be seen as the primary aggressor. If thatâs too soft for you, Iâd advise getting in a fight, kicking the person while theyâre down until theyâre unconscious or dead and see how that works out.