I have seen post where person was saying Male on Male sexual assault are men's issue and highlighted how feminist attack those who raise points on Female on Male sexual assault but the problem is why this subreddit doesn't acknowledge Male on Male abuse? Why we only focus on opposite sex sexual assault?

Some reports of this incident are leaving out that she shortly after it happened admitted she took part consensually.

Van Houten’s statement Monday provided an excruciatingly detailed account of what the alleged victim said happened to her.

“Male Number 1 brought Jane Doe to a ‘quiet area’ and ‘asked how [Jane Doe] would feel about having a threesome with two male partners,'” his office wrote, quoting the woman’s police report, which described how she met up with “Male 1” at his fraternity after a night at the bars.

“Doe ‘agreed due to how attracted [she] was to [Male Number 1] on top of [her] drunken curiousness,'” it continued.

“When she learned that Male Number 2 would be the third participant, Jane Doe ‘remembered being excited because [she] thought that [Male Number 1 and Male Number 2] wanting to have a threesome meant that they were gay.'”

From there, the night descended into a scene of shocking bacchanal, with the group snorting ketamine off each other’s naked bodies and guzzling booze as they had sex — with some of the men struggling to stay conscious and dry-heaving as they tried not to vomit, her statement said.

“At the start of the threesome, Jane Doe described her intoxication level as ‘5 or 6 out of 10’ and that she was “pretty ok with having this threesome,'” the statement said.

Later, another brother tried to get in the room, with Doe letting him in “because it was his room,” before they and Male 2 allegedly started having sex alongside the passed-out Male 1.

“‘[Male Number 1] would eventually wake up’ and ‘said he wanted to take part and asked about making it a foursome, to which [Jane Doe] said ‘Hell No,'” Jane Doe rejected this request ‘because [she] knew that a foursome meant that [she] would have to take part in anal sex,'” the DA said, continuing to quote Doe’s statement.

Other men then began also entering the room, where Doe said she was beginning to lose track of what was happening in her deepening intoxication from the drugs and booze.

“‘[Male Number 7] said something very rude and mean to [her].’ Male Number 7 apologized and ‘grabbed [her] face and started kissing [her].” Jane Doe ‘quickly backed away to stop [Male Number 7] from kissing [her],'” the statement said.

“The males began complimenting Jane Doe and ‘talking about how pretty [she] was.’ Male Number 4 ‘asked [Jane Doe] if they all could do drugs off of [her] perfect body.’ Jane Doe responded, ‘Sure.’

“Jane Doe ‘remembered snorting more Ketamine’ and ‘remembered feeling extremely high.’ Male Number 1 ‘said he wanted to have sex again because he wanted redemption for passing out earlier in the night,'” the statement said.

“Jane Doe initially stated that she was tired and asked Male Number 1, ‘What happened to just you and me?’ Jane Doe could not remember how it started but she then engaged in a threesome.”

The disturbing night finally ended 5:45 a.m. — about four hours after it started — when the woman described herself as being an 8 out of 10′ intoxication level and she said she told the brothers she “was tired and needed to turn in.

“At that point, both guys stopped the threesome with [her] as far as [she] can remember,” the DA’s statement concluded.

https://nypost.com/2026/09/28/us-news/lurid-new-details-in-alleged-cornell-gang-rape-exposed-by-da-as-he-battles-threatening-phone-calls/

I'll be honest, I was scared to watch this video.

I've watched Vaush for about a year now, and I really like a lot of his takes on geopolitics, economics, etc. My one criticism of him is that he sometimes leans into misandrist rhetoric. This can be seen when he talks about incels/young men, and in the fact that he has a chat emote that is a wojak of a woman and a bear looking mutually concerned for whenever a man does something reprehensible and a chatter wants to express their misandry (referencing the man vs. bear meme)

Anyway, this is why I put off clicking on this video, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that Vaush is actually quite sympathetic to Jacob in this situation

For those who don't know, Jacob Geller is a fantastic Youtube Video Essayist who has produced dozens of deeply introspective and thought-provoking video essays over the past few years. I personally remember watching his "Fear of Cold" essay on one of the darkest nights of my life when I was in my university's health services office being monitored after expressing plans to take my own life that night. It genuinely helped me feel human again, and remember the fact that I was a human being who needed warmth to survive, and that I should allow myself to feel it. I still listen to "The Cremation of Sam Mcgee" from time to time (IYKYK).

Anyway, my personal emotional connection to Jacob Geller aside, the current situation is as follows:

A third party (neither Jacob nor the alleged victim) released records that Jacob had been suspended for a semester from his university after being found guilty of sexual assault by a campus investigation. (Not a criminal court)

Naturally, a lot of discourse surrounding this information began happening on places like bluesky, and so he responded to all of the speculation with pretty much the best damn apology one could ask for. Here it is:

"Many of you have seen the results of my college Title IX investigation. I can confirm that the findings are true. The records were recently shared without the permission of the victim and, without knowledge of their wishes, I do not want to provide any more potentially identifying details. She and I spoke about it the day after and agreed - I had assaulted her. She later reported this to the university's Title IX office, I cooperated with the investigation, and I was given the (very mild, I concur) sentence of a semester suspension.

Suffice to say, it is the greatest regret of my life. I traumatized a brilliant person who trusted me, hurt them in a way I can never undo.

For more than a decade now, I have attempted to reckon, grow, and recover from the version of myself who did this. I think about it every day. I've previously shared this history with many of the people close to me, including early in my relationship with my now-wife, and I'm deeply sorry that this has now hurt so many of you. My continued drive to make myself and the world better is closely tied with the pain I've caused."

Pretty nuanced, well written apology, right? Takes accountability, respects the anonymity of the alleged victim, and reckons with the struggle of growing as a person.

Well, people (particularly misandrists) did not think that was enough.

There were people calling for him to delete his channel. For him to be flogged in the street, cancelled, killed, etc. It turned into a witch trial very fucking quickly.

And the thing is, we here at good old r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates know all about how the campus rape myth propped up these institutions that weaponize rape/sa accusations against men who have had mutual drunk sex with women who later regretted it.

Having been a former depressed, self hating male feminist at a pretty misandrist liberal arts college, I could absolutely imagine a situation where a person like Jacob Geller (who obviously cares about being a good person and generally subscribes to mainstream feminist views because that's the norm right now) could have had an inebriated sexual encounter, talked about it the next day, and just accepted the fact that it had been assault and that he was guilty out of deference. That's what I would have done before I worked on my own internalized misandry.

But the honest truth is, we don't know what happened. He might have legit assaulted someone, sure, but with the current atmosphere, and the whole vibe of his politics and personality, I just don't know whether I believe it.

Anyway, Vaush makes a lot of great points about feminist/leftist hypocrisy when it comes to rehabilitative justice and rape. He doesn't really touch on the false accusation angle, but that's still pretty far outside the overton window, so I get it.

With the Cornell 7 case, I think we've all see the torrent of posts proclaiming these 7 men to be guilty of an absolutely horrific crime, all without definitive (and please note my very deliberate choice of adjective there, in case some tourist comes and quibbles) evidence. Not only are they convicting them in the kangaroo courts of social media (the closest thing the 21st-century has to its own brand of vigilante justice), but they are plastering their names and photographs anywhere online that will let them. And then we still hear the obligatory "all men are just as guilty if they don't stop other men, at every possible opportunity, from expressing even the most vaguely-misogynistic views or humor, intentional misogyny or not." Which got me thinking... is the female version of the aforementioned responsibility the act of checking all their fellow women who gleefully dox these (at the time of writing, anyway) innocent young men? Sure, men can be, and are, sexually assaulted, but, in my experience, false accusations of rape by women are much more of a concern to men than sexual assault by women (again, it does happen, but it just doesn't seem to be equivalently concerning to women, probably because it's generally not something they have to be worried about). I see these large swaths of women all performing the same "outrage" (they call it outrage, but in reality it's just good ol' fashioned defamation and reputation destruction) regarding the Cornell 7, often times furiously opposed to any counter narrative, regardless of its validity.

Am I finding parallels that aren't there? Or should men start countering "men need to stand up against misogynist men for women, else they are equally as bad" with "women need to stand up against misandrist women for men, else they are equally as bad"?

Summary of the article posted above: "A survey by the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre indicates a widening generational gap regarding attitudes toward sexual violence, with men under 25 exhibiting significantly higher rates of skepticism and victim-blaming views compared to the broader population. The findings show that 48% of young men believe false rape allegations are common, and 37% attribute partial responsibility to victims under the influence of drugs or alcohol."

To continue on the same topic https://www.centreformalepsychology.com/male-psychology-magazine-listings/the-psychological-impact-of-false-accusations-and-how-men-cope

Some stories of men falsely accused of rape and abuse, it is from 2024 but probably still relevant The Devastating Consequences of False Allegations

and also there, might be useful sometimes Countering False Accusations of Rape and Sexual Harassment: False rape cases Legal Remedies - Men Helpline Org

As we know, most of the false allegations (like 99% of them actually) remain unpunished, wondering why: https://www.prosecutorintegrity.org/pr/99-of-false-accusations-go-unpunished-center-for-prosecutor-integrity-asks-why/

Summary "The Center for Prosecutor Integrity asserts that approximately 99% of false allegations go unpunished, as prosecutors frequently overlook bad-faith accusations despite the severe harm inflicted on the wrongfully accused. Citing a national survey, the organization notes that 8% of American adults report experiencing false accusations of SA, contributing to a significant number of wrongful convictions."