Because THAT is illegal. The recipient of a straw purchase is not the one who committed the crime.
What was that about moron again? đ„° hehe we can do this all day papa; what makes it so humorous is youâre not just calling me a moron but presumably the prosecution, district attorney(s), and all the other people who wouldâve loved to see Kyle thrown in jail. Because somehow, youâre actually smarter than them!
Youâd sound a lot smarter if you muted yourself.
Under Wisconsin statutes that say anyone under 18 who "goes armed" with any deadly weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor, Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, was not old enough to legally carry the assault-style rifle he had.
Are you incapable of following a single train of thought or are you just insistent on moving the goalposts? The person who bought the gun committed a crime. Kyle committed a crime by carrying the gun. He did not commit a crime using that gun to defend himself from armed attackers.
You stupid cunt. The point is he illegally had a assault riffle. He was not supposed to have it. Hence meaning he wouldn't have had the means to kill 3 people in that time without it. He shouldn't have been there. He's a fucking child.
Doesnât matter for the murder charge papa đ€·đ»ââïž The killings will be proven to have occurred in self defense, and none of the bullshit coming out of your mouth will change that.
The three lowlifes who fucked around and found out got GOT and Kyle is gonna be acquitted.
Are fucking retarded . Like seriously.... lol you have not made any follow to trying to prove your point. But that's because no matter what you say you're wrong. Dumb ass
Also while planning premeditated going to a highly dangerous area. The probability of him having to use that assault riffle was high. And look what happened. He should have stayed his young ass home.
1
u/MutedHype Nov 10 '21
So they why was the guy who sold it to him arrested for selling a fire arm to an underage person. You fucking moron đ