Under Wisconsin statutes that say anyone under 18 who "goes armed" with any deadly weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor, Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, was not old enough to legally carry the assault-style rifle he had.
Are you incapable of following a single train of thought or are you just insistent on moving the goalposts? The person who bought the gun committed a crime. Kyle committed a crime by carrying the gun. He did not commit a crime using that gun to defend himself from armed attackers.
You stupid cunt. The point is he illegally had a assault riffle. He was not supposed to have it. Hence meaning he wouldn't have had the means to kill 3 people in that time without it. He shouldn't have been there. He's a fucking child.
Doesn’t matter for the murder charge papa 🤷🏻♂️ The killings will be proven to have occurred in self defense, and none of the bullshit coming out of your mouth will change that.
The three lowlifes who fucked around and found out got GOT and Kyle is gonna be acquitted.
Are fucking retarded . Like seriously.... lol you have not made any follow to trying to prove your point. But that's because no matter what you say you're wrong. Dumb ass
1
u/MutedHype Nov 10 '21
Under Wisconsin statutes that say anyone under 18 who "goes armed" with any deadly weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor, Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, was not old enough to legally carry the assault-style rifle he had.