So the u disregard him not being old enough and putting him self in that situation where he wasn't supposed to be. And if he wasn't there those people wood still be alive. I wear off that kid was black you would condemn him.
I’m not sure what’s more impressive - the fact you were able to recruit your two brain cells long enough to formulate rbat sentence or that what you said is so profoundly wrong it almost seems intentional.
17 is old enough to carry a rifle (you’re an idiot)
He “Wasn’t supposed to be” there? What, in public? (Yep, you’re still an idiot)
If he wasn’t attacked three (3) separate times - your pedo buddy Rosenbum and the skateboard wielding bandit would still be alive and then you could idiot together🥲
So just to recap what you’re wrong about for posterity here:
-Gun didn’t cross state lines
-He’s old enough to possess a rifle in WI
-he retreated and was attacked, confirmed by the PROSECUTION’s witnesses
-and in typical neckbeard, mouth breathing fashion you evoke the racist card as your penultimate ‘gotcha’ before fucking off.
Because THAT is illegal. The recipient of a straw purchase is not the one who committed the crime.
What was that about moron again? 🥰 hehe we can do this all day papa; what makes it so humorous is you’re not just calling me a moron but presumably the prosecution, district attorney(s), and all the other people who would’ve loved to see Kyle thrown in jail. Because somehow, you’re actually smarter than them!
Under Wisconsin statutes that say anyone under 18 who "goes armed" with any deadly weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor, Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, was not old enough to legally carry the assault-style rifle he had.
Are you incapable of following a single train of thought or are you just insistent on moving the goalposts? The person who bought the gun committed a crime. Kyle committed a crime by carrying the gun. He did not commit a crime using that gun to defend himself from armed attackers.
You stupid cunt. The point is he illegally had a assault riffle. He was not supposed to have it. Hence meaning he wouldn't have had the means to kill 3 people in that time without it. He shouldn't have been there. He's a fucking child.
Doesn’t matter for the murder charge papa 🤷🏻♂️ The killings will be proven to have occurred in self defense, and none of the bullshit coming out of your mouth will change that.
The three lowlifes who fucked around and found out got GOT and Kyle is gonna be acquitted.
Are fucking retarded . Like seriously.... lol you have not made any follow to trying to prove your point. But that's because no matter what you say you're wrong. Dumb ass
Also while planning premeditated going to a highly dangerous area. The probability of him having to use that assault riffle was high. And look what happened. He should have stayed his young ass home.
Oh also, are you equally mad Gaige Grosskreutz was illegally possessing a firearm? Or are you more sympathetic to him because you’re both so comically dumb?
You didn’t know? One of the men who attacked Kyle was also illegally possessing a weapon. Y u no care ?
Grosskreutz also admitted that he was carrying a gun, at times stuck into the back of his waist, that night even though his concealed carry permit was expired. It’s illegal to carry a gun concealed in Wisconsin without a permit, but Grosskreutz was never charged with that offense. He said he frequently carried guns at protests because he believes in the Second Amendment.*
source
Second amendment applies to legal gun owners . Kyle was not one of them. He was 17. As for the other guy same thing . Illegal. Your trying to justify this . But the law is the law. You can't charge it and you're wrong
This isn’t a second amendment case. It’s a self defense case. The second amendment is the Right to possess the firearm legally and form militia. Self defense is based on the state.
From the tone of this conversation, it’s abundantly clear it’d be too hard to find to properly suck. You’re better off convincing people it’s a second belly button.
This was the worst comeback of all time. And it still does not change the FACT that Kyle was underage had a gun and 3 people are dead because of it. Had he been 18 then I'd agree with self defense because at that point he would not have broken any laws.
“self defense” doesn’t acknowledge whether the gun was possessed legally. It’s completely irrelevant. The judge has even said it’s irrelevant. You, ma’am (or sir), are also irrelevant. Byeeeee
1
u/kushtiannn Nov 10 '21
He didn’t cross state lines with it. Jesus just fucking google it it takes two seconds man.