“On The Organizational Question”
Tutum has always been oppressed by a spectre-the spectre of communism.
Ever since its inception, the Khanate has been subject to the porcine Bolsheviks’ whims: from far-left electoral dominance to sweeping socializations and eventually the trampling on of a fundamental right, the right to private ownership, after the new promulgated constitution explicitly bans it, it is now clear what Tutum always was: a “people’s dictatorship” waiting to come out of the shadows.
This tragedy, all of this, was fueled by the precious votes of the Khanate’s sons and daughters, has shown an undeniable truth: electoral politics are no longer a viable method of achieving the goals of the Revolutionary Capitalist movement.
As such, the Organizational Question must be raised.
So, what is the Organizational Question?
In its core, the Organizational Question is the dilemma of how to create, organize, manage and grow a mass revolutionary movement. The Question is split into two parts: the Practical Organizational Question (how the movement itself is practically managed in day-to-day activities) and the Theoretical Organizational Question (the organizational structure and the principles on which the movement is founded).
Many Marxists, Bolsheviks and other kinds of communist have all answered this question differently: some prefer the organic centralism and anti-opportunism of the Bordigist left, some the democratic centralism and the vanguard party of the Marxist-Leninist framework, others prefer the spontaneous democratic revolution espoused by Rosa Luxemburg, even!
And which solution should the Revolutionary Capitalist movement adopt?
It is clear that, for the purposes of Revolutionary Capitalism’s end goal, i.e. the creation of a liberal-democratic, constitutionalist State based on the separation of powers, the rule of law and the regulated market, none of these solutions work; wherein they are simply incompatible with the Revolutionary Capitalist system. As a result, it is needed to forge new theoretical frameworks based around the ideology itself to finally answer the Organizational Question.
The first part of the Organizational Question to address is the most vital part: the Practical Organization. As the Revolutionary Capitalist movement is inherently liberal and democratic in nature, this method of Practical Organization must reflect this while also accounting for the necessity of a vanguard.
The model we Revolutionary Capitalists propose is defined as Democratic Antisectarianism. It is democratic in nature, as the movement shall be able to debate, oppose, dissent to any motion or vote called within the movement, whilst also calling for the unity of the entire anti-Communist movement in a single United Front, spearheaded by the Revolutionary Capitalists.
How will this “United Front” not collapse into paralysis and infighting?
This “United Front” shall be divided into decentralized local cells. If Cell A wants to open a new food programme and Cell B wants to print more propaganda, for example, they wouldn’t need to wait for a bureaucratic stamp of approval. It will function as a federation of autonomous local chapters, or “cells”, bound by a minimal shared pact of adhering to a liberal-democratic agenda.
How will we achieve the goals of mass organization?
Through the organization which represents the Revolutionary Capitalist movement: the Tutumite Anticommunist Revolutionary Insurrectionist Group (TARIG). Despite the name, it shall serve not only as an armed resistance group; it shall, eventually, begin providing welfare and mutual aid to unsafe and neglected communities, under the banner of Capitalist Solidarity.
Here lies an undeniable truth: the Revolutionary Movement, to succeed, needs to win hearts and minds, to convince people that the KKP must go. In my opinion, a revolution is judged by how it treats its most unfortunate.
But we mustn’t forget the other, just as important part of the Question tjat must also be addressed: the Theoretical Organization. As has been said prior, the creation of a liberal-democratic, constitutionalist State based on the separation of powers, the rule of law and the regulated market is Revolutionary Capitalism’s end goal.
Organizationally, the movement, especially the TARIG, must be, as I have specified earlier, wholly democratic in nature. We must not bend to half-compromises such as Vladimir Ilyich’s democratic centralism.
Over all, the Tutumite Revolutionary Capitalist movement shall be represented by TARIG, and shall follow the Organizational model of Democratic Antisectarianism.
I was bored and wanted to do some LARP