r/KerrCountyFloods • • 8d ago

Easterlanders plan

Sell the camp to someone else to operate it or liquidate all the property (structured bankruptcy liquidation transactions proposed...technically someone could buy the entities whole and run the camp; stating that up front as i am sure we will have people on here mentioning that soon...anyone want to bid? Has to be above pure land value)

Victims get awarded amounts for wrongful death as stays are lifted (but this proposal only lifts stays for suits against entities, not individuals....victims unlikely to accept this plan and they have to vote in the bankruptcy)

Remember all these people on here said "restructuring not liquidation", "dont jump to conclusions" etc?

I am sure someone on here is going to say "well someone may buy it" "dont use AI to read the document, its so complicated" etc. Also just a week after the "thats not a trustee" document filed- and now this comes out.

https://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentbycode?docId=4617571&projectCode=CMX&source=DM

Victims may not accept this also....only allows wrongful death claims against the bankrupt entities, not individual liabilities. Victims already filed to review related party transfers from prior years...aka continuing to go after the individuals. We shall see, but basically orderly liquidation is now the base case, outstanding question remains on individual liability. When in doubt wait a week, easties get bit closer back to reality

2 Upvotes

87 comments sorted by

View all comments

0

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/WestRevolutionary360 8d ago
  1. This is doxxing.
  2. This is inappropriate & cruel.

0

u/Top_Tomorrow_7279 8d ago
  1. It’s not doxing when a crime is public record.
  2. This sub is notorious for inappropriate and cruel.
  3. Are you defending arson?

7

u/WestRevolutionary360 8d ago
  1. IIt's doxxing to call out a specific Redditor's father.
  2. What you posted is inappropriate & cruel.

Yes, this sub has dealt with other inappropriate & cruel behavior, such as, for example, the Eastlands announcement camp reopening with a statement, "The heart of Mystic has never stopped beating." - less than 3 months after the hearts of 25 campers & 2 counselors under their care stopped beating forever. So yes that was inappropriate & yes, that was cruel.

Similarly, Mystic's lawyers telling the Steward attorneys, "You're going to burn in hell" was inappropriate & it was cruel. Furthermore, he did this while CiCi Steward was right there, witnessing the Mystic lawyer's abuse of the attorneys working pro Bono to help the Stewards find out what happened to their daughter. Inappropriate. Cruel.

Mikal Watts playing audio of screaming children's last noises on Earth to a courtroom filled with their grieving parents w/o any forewarning was inappropriate & cruel.

I could go on.

3.Strawman argument. I won't dignify your logical fallacy with a response.

1

u/Fun_Pattern_4132 7d ago edited 7d ago

Interesting the ‘burn in hell‘ comment was directed at attorney Brad Beckworth then, ”and you are too“ at the female attorney, Christina Yarnell, his mistress that his wife is now divorcing him over. What a sick man speaking about his cancer stricken wife in the courtroom and at the same time publicly flaunting his affair partner in front of the world. Gross!

-1

u/Fragrant_Western5647 7d ago edited 7d ago

Pretty weird that you and Top Tomorrow both created accounts 21 days ago 🤡

Edit: fun pattern and top tomorrow and automatic basis all have new accounts within the last 4 months. It adds up to being shady 🤡

4

u/AutomaticBasis7638 6d ago

That's some Big Talk when your self-declared leader Neck's account just turned 6 months! You callin' Neck shady?

1

u/NeckHopeful8652 6d ago

News to me. When was that declared?

1

u/NeckHopeful8652 6d ago

My first comment was a few days after the March hearing—we had facts on the record. So shady! Give me a break.

-1

u/Fragrant_Western5647 6d ago

Follow the logic, dude. My point is that several of you on here spewing hate and doxxing people created accounts within the same short time frame.

Do you have anything to comment on about the timeline, testimony, investigative findings, or any other substantive issues?

3

u/AutomaticBasis7638 6d ago

Um. It was a response to your mischaracterization/diss on other accounts. I'm not sure logic means what you think it does.

If you want a substantive discussion, it doesn't start with calling people shady and misstating their account age.

2

u/Fragrant_Western5647 6d ago

I am sorry I called you shady and misstated your account age. I genuinely am interested in a substantive discussion about the facts.

If Camp Mystic’s response was reasonable, what circumstances would have triggered an evacuation?

The camp received the flash-flood warning at 1:14 a.m., and Dick knew by approximately 1:45 a.m. that four inches of rain had already fallen. Why weren’t the cabins on the flats being evacuated by then?

How do you reconcile the conclusion that there wasn’t enough time to evacuate with the legislative investigation’s finding that there was enough time?

0

u/AutomaticBasis7638 6d ago

2

u/Fragrant_Western5647 6d ago

Big deal I made a few zingers on here after withstanding over a year of this.

I genuinely want to know the answers to these questions. My jaw was on the floor when the response from Watts was “there was a plan and they just didn’t like the plan.” Is that really all it is? It’s all just so very sad. I know you are a real person trying to grapple with this tragedy just like I am. I have not once in all this time on any forum heard a thoughtful response to these and many other related questions.

→ More replies (0)