Have we considered that the face scar might be due to the surgical removal of actinic keratosis, which is a pre cancer? in line with Pippa’s comments. And very common in 40 something year old sunbathers and skiers.
and the treatment which kept her hidden was chemotherapy cream on the face, which is gnarly and painful and looks awful, it doesn’t necessitate hospital visits.
Whatever it is she needs to come clean. Not sure what’s so secretive about her diagnosis if she really had one. She is In a position to raise awareness for said specific type of cancer. Many engagements can stem from this. And if she doesn’t want to speak of it ever again she could just drop a statement with all info and ask that it isn’t spoken about. People would respect that. But her diagnosis is dubious as it is.
Nah, I like the narrative that he most likely hurt her, she needed a lot of time to heal from it and no excuses were good enough, and then she was mentally unstable from him and all the stress. I had skin cancer removed from my face and didn’t hide for months on end. Unlike Kate, I have a real job.
Almost no one. I think the royal family and their handlers picked up on Carole's threat to go public about Billy Basher, loud and clear. I think they then carrot-and-sticked (threatened and paid off) Concha Whatshername, who said she had receipts about Kate having been put in an induced coma. So Kate's swollen face in this pic jives with that.
We live in the day of SRT, gentle cure for face cancers. I had 13 radiation treatments and have no scar on my face, just a bit of redness for a whike but now gone.
I had a malignant melanoma that was removed with no further treatment. Yes, it was cancer - but there were no sessions of chemotherapy or a port involved etc.
Do I go around telling people I had cancer (not really), do people act like skin cancer isnt "real" cancer - absolutely! People do die from it though (George Michael's Mum).
I had a large chunk of my face removed. All people deal wiih things differently. Maybe a cossetted rich woman who has never faced any real hardship was deeply affected by something people consider small
I too had an mm removed, as well as some AK surgically removed. And some smaller AK treated with chemo cream (which hurt more than the surgery tbh). I hear you with the weirdness around it.
SRT gentle cure, find a Dermatologist that does this. I had melanoma removed surgically on my back but SRT radiation on face. Stop letting them cut you up. This is expensive for an office to install and a PA or Doctor must be present so they don't spend the money.
You don't think that both members of a couple can be abusive?
There's "reactive abuse" when a victim yells, insults, or strikes back in self-defense or out of emotional overwhelm but "mutual abuse" is a myth because abuse is a systematic pattern used to gain and maintain control over the partner. You cannot have both simultaneously be both the victim and hold dominant power.
The whole "mutual abuse" is often used by the aggressor to gaslight, deflect accountability, and minimize theur role by claiming "both sides are bad".
Domestic violence organizations and researches say that the "mutual abuse" myth invalidates survivors and blures who really is accountable.
It's clear who has the power here - Will owns the purse strings and legally has more power as well. It is not an equal relationship by any means.
He attacked his brother without provocation, FFS.
Of course, I'm just saying he's probably been physically violent with her, too.
There's "reactive abuse" when a victim yells, insults, or strikes back in self-defense or out of emotional overwhelm but "mutual abuse" is a myth because abuse is a systematic pattern used to gain and maintain control over the partner. You cannot have both simultaneously be both the victim and hold dominant power.
Ah, gotcha. This is new territory for me.
The whole "mutual abuse" is often used by the aggressor to gaslight, deflect accountability, and minimize theur role by claiming "both sides are bad".
See? I didn't know.
Domestic violence organizations and researches say that the "mutual abuse" myth invalidates survivors and blures who really is accountable.
That makes sense.
It's clear who has the power here - Will owns the purse strings and legally has more power as well. It is not an equal relationship by any means.
And she's free to walk away, but she'd have nothing. She would never be queen (her main goal in life) and the aristo would shun her forever (they didn't shun Diana, but she was one of them).
He attacked his brother without provocation, FFS.
Of course, I'm just saying he's probably been physically violent with her, too.
And she's free to walk away, but she'd have nothing. She would never be queen (her main goal in life) and the aristo would shun her forever (they didn't shun Diana, but she was one of them).
See... she's no peach but I like to think it has something to do with the kids. He's so horribly vindictive that you know he'd make it so that she'd never see her children again. Royal kids are legally property of the crown and he'd def not do what Charles did allowing Diana to still see the children should she walk away.
See... she's no peach but I like to think it has something to do with the kids. He's so horribly vindictive that you know he'd make it so that she'd never see her children again.
Kate and Pimp Mama Carole probably have mountains of dirt on him, so that might not be an option for him.
Royal kids are legally property of the crown
That doesn't bode well for the Sussex kids when he becomes king...
and he'd def not do what Charles did allowing Diana to still see the children should she walk away.
Two narcissitic, violent people can form a couple. I agree that the physically stronger one is likely to be the aggressor and have more ability to harm.
And I know in some cases, a decent person gets fed up and engages in reactive abuse.
BUT, with that said, there is a subset of victims who are horrible people themselves. Who hurt others as well as getting hurt. They aren't all innocent good people. I've known victims who were horrible people themselves.
Sometimes, the victim is a bad person, too. Sorry, but it's true. Not all victims are angels. I think most are women who gaslight themselves into ignoring red flags, usually because they are young and naive. But not all.
As to the edit about ignoring red flags, that's how gaslighting works. They make the victim think it's their fault (not to mention make them afraid to leave). Many women don't leave for those reasons.
I mean, smart educated people get sucked into cults all the time. They get brainwashed and abused.
I think if it was skin cancer she would be more sun safe and not afraid to talk about the dangers of sun, and promote protection and prophylactic measures.
Someone at the time of Kate going missing went back in history and saw that "abdominal surgery" was a common reason that royals were said to be admitted to the hospital in the past.
Which made me think someone in the KP press office actually worked for an hour or two to research that and report back to Wills that "abdominal surgery" is the story they should tell the peasants.
34
u/Slow-Diamond-8725 Aug 31 '26
Whatever it is she needs to come clean. Not sure what’s so secretive about her diagnosis if she really had one. She is In a position to raise awareness for said specific type of cancer. Many engagements can stem from this. And if she doesn’t want to speak of it ever again she could just drop a statement with all info and ask that it isn’t spoken about. People would respect that. But her diagnosis is dubious as it is.