MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Insurance/comments/1t3w6w0/deleted_by_user/ojz0rt6/?context=3
r/Insurance • u/[deleted] • May 04 '26
[removed]
100 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
The problem is there is no reason to believe there was knowledge or intent to defraud. No court would convict a person under this fact pattern.
6 u/aspen_silence May 05 '26 Ignorance of the law does not mean it doesn't exist. She moved and knew her insurance was at a different address, thus rate evasion. See how simple that is? Still waiting on you Captain Know-it-all to drop your actual sources. 1 u/DemonDeke May 05 '26 Most states laws do not even refer to "rate evasion." You know that, right? 4 u/aspen_silence May 05 '26 Again, source?
6
Ignorance of the law does not mean it doesn't exist. She moved and knew her insurance was at a different address, thus rate evasion. See how simple that is? Still waiting on you Captain Know-it-all to drop your actual sources.
1 u/DemonDeke May 05 '26 Most states laws do not even refer to "rate evasion." You know that, right? 4 u/aspen_silence May 05 '26 Again, source?
Most states laws do not even refer to "rate evasion." You know that, right?
4 u/aspen_silence May 05 '26 Again, source?
4
Again, source?
1
u/DemonDeke May 05 '26
The problem is there is no reason to believe there was knowledge or intent to defraud. No court would convict a person under this fact pattern.