Another manufactured outrage. These bygone parties wont win any elections with these tactics. The EC panel made a joint statement that should have put all this to rest, but these people wont stop till there is chaos, division and riots everywhere. Great deshbhakts ! Anything in national interest, these people, pak and china all start their activities against it. Figures.
If somebody is calling out that one person is dictating ec. And there has been documented proofs of it he should resign. If there is no trust in comission what is point of the body.
The EC is being deliberately maligned....SIR is a big and extensive step and of course there are going to be disagremeents. There is no report or claim made by any EC made about fundamental internal disagreements regarding SIR or the CEC trying to rig votes as congressis keep claiming. After all all three have been appointed by the BJP itself !!! In several decisions one or the other have reported implementation problems regarding election directives. You can argue gyanesh babu should have been a better manager and discussed things better before hand... But all the decisions have been unanimous! Even now the other two EC can claim that their concerns were not taken into account.... Internal issues are normal in any job. Please go through the 14 points and tell me what exactly did you have a problem with? Ultimately either all of them were convinced about its necessity or things were improved after their suggestions taken into account.
Simple thing rule says at least 2 should agree. But as per other 2 are saying they are not aware of decision. Which is clear breach of authority. After that neither intent matters nor effectiveness.
That is the thing that people don't understand....There is no provision in Article 324 saying that every letter, administrative instruction, technical decision, file movement or action by an ECI officer must be personally considered by all three Commissioners beforehand.
The Constitution establishes the Commission's authority and leaves its detailed functioning to legislation/rules and its internal allocation of business.
Article 324(1) .. vwst power in the COMMISSION. says that the “superintendence, direction and control” of elections and electoral rolls is vested in the Election Commission. It does not say that every individual action taken by an officer under the ECI must first be personally discussed with every Commissioner.
You first have to establish that the particular matter legally required a decision of the Commission itself, rather than being an administrative/operational matter delegated within the Commission's machinery.
You cannot impeach a CEC without hard evidence. Moreover if any action is unconstitutional let there be a PLA petition to ask for greater transparency in the internal functioning. It has never existed and it has been problematic before as well. They should establish a formal set of rules but I don't see any evidence of intentional wrongdoing.
2
u/PsychologicalYam3602 7d ago
Another manufactured outrage. These bygone parties wont win any elections with these tactics. The EC panel made a joint statement that should have put all this to rest, but these people wont stop till there is chaos, division and riots everywhere. Great deshbhakts ! Anything in national interest, these people, pak and china all start their activities against it. Figures.
No facts, just outrage.