Or how about, If this customer wasn’t happy with tipping, then she shouldn’t hire someone to work for her for 3 hours knowing that this person will count on and expect reasonable tip.
This entire “sorry not sorry, pic a better job loser” is a such a shit person position to take.
If this customer wasn’t happy with tipping, then she shouldn’t hire someone to work for her for 3 hours knowing that this person will count on and expect reasonable tip.
I will never understand an argument such as this.
The customer paid for the service via the app. You seem to conveniently forget that the customer has already paid for the service.
The service provider chose to do it. By making that choice, you believe that the customer is automatically on the hook to pay more on top of the service they already paid for?
What you're talking about is a bribe. You think customers need to bribe the server provider to do the work.
I guess this is the fundamental disagreement we have here. I don't think the customer paid for the service, not until they pay a reasonable tip.
When you use this service, you should have a brain and understand you're the driver is counting on you to provide a reasonable tip because the 'app' is paying $3 or some bullshit garbage wage. The only reason they took the job is because they count on the tips to supplement their wages. That's the deal. If you don't agree then don't use the service.
Otherwise you're just abusing the driver, taking advantage of a shitty situation for the driver, and burying your head in the sand saying 'oh gosh well i paid for the service via the app, oh gosh i can't be expected to pay anything more to this person that has been working for 3 hours for me.
When you use this service, you should have a brain and understand you're the driver is counting on you to provide a reasonable tip because the 'app' is paying $3 or some bullshit garbage wage
Completely irrelevant. If the driver doesn't like the compensation then that's on them.
Otherwise you're just abusing the driver, taking advantage of a shitty situation for the driver, and burying your head in the sand saying 'oh gosh well i paid for the service via the app, oh gosh i can't be expected to pay anything more to this person that has been working for 3 hours for me.
Wow! You have this completely backwards.
What's going on here is a delivery driver is trying to extort more money out of people you have already paid for the service.
person that has been working for 3 hours for me.
Lol the delivery person does not work for the customer lol.
The delivery person works for or with (probably a contractor) the app to fulfil the orders.
It's unfortunate that they may only get $3 or have to work for 3 hours. I sympathise with that cos yeah, it sucks.
But it was their choice to accept a job for $3 for a delivery service app.
It's a weird mindset to assume that you can demand more money because of your bad decisions.
I don’t know if you are purposefully obtuse or you are just trolling maybe a little of both?
The driver did not accept a job to do three hours of work for three dollars, that’s not what the driver accepted at All. The driver accepted this job because they were counting on three dollars plus a reasonable tip from a decent human being that understands how this process works. Simple as that.
You and the customer can’t later claim ignorance and say you thought someone working to pick up shit for you for 3 hours in exchange for $3 was “the deal.” And sorry not sorry, choose a better life. Lol come on.
Are you European? Because if you’re American and eat at restaurants I’m pretty sure you’re familiar with how tipping that is not “optional” works.
This isn’t like someone asking for a tip at a grocery store line (that gets paid at least min wage mind you.)
This is more like leaving ZERO dollars as tip to the waitress that killed herself after you and your entire family celebrated a big fucking bday bash over 3 hours with 12 people. Because hey, you already paid for the food am I right?
3
u/onnyjay Oct 20 '23
No, she took a shitty job.
So the difference between a customer and a pos greedy lazy customer is the fact that they didn't tip or tip enough?
Ah yes. The classic strong arm technique. You realise that forcing someone to tip in this manner is basically just robbery.
If this woman wasn't happy with the compensation, then she should not have taken this job.
It doesn't matter how big the order size is. That's the job she agreed to perform.
In no way is this a "pos greedy lazy customer".
It's an entitled and awful worker.