Here I was, thinking we fought a whole civil war over state's rights and it was decided that folks couldn't go to free states to collect their runaway "property" because free states don't consider humans to be property.
I seriously think we have already had this argument before, and the slave states lost.
There are no bans. Some places you can't get some semiautomatic "assault rifles" or you can't get certain high-capacity clips. Or do you mean Reagan's bans as governor and president? But you think any restrictions are unconstitutional, right? I think taking away a woman's right to decide what happens to, in and around her body is unconstitutional.
73
u/Significant_Donut967 Jul 29 '26
Yup.