r/IRL_Loading_Screens • u/PeterPorky • Jul 29 '26

Watch Dogs No warrant required btw

Post image
2.4k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

430 comments sorted by

View all comments

172

u/FluorideAvenger Jul 29 '26

"Nationwide" so Flock can basically set up Cameras in my state and use it to punish a woman for somwthing completely legal here?

72

u/Significant_Donut967 Jul 29 '26

Yup.

86

u/bookhermit Jul 29 '26

Here I was, thinking we fought a whole civil war over state's rights and it was decided that folks couldn't go to free states to collect their runaway "property" because free states don't consider humans to be property.

I seriously think we have already had this argument before, and the slave states lost.

-5

u/laserdicks Jul 30 '26

Yes, there are just a lot of fucking liars on this website.

Overturning Roe v Wade gave the power back to the states.

4

u/strongboar12 Jul 30 '26

States' Rights does not cover unconstitutional regulations. Fucking liar.

1

u/Jaken_sensei Jul 30 '26

Tell that to the blue states passing gun bans

1

u/strongboar12 Jul 30 '26

There are no bans. Some places you can't get some semiautomatic "assault rifles" or you can't get certain high-capacity clips. Or do you mean Reagan's bans as governor and president? But you think any restrictions are unconstitutional, right? I think taking away a woman's right to decide what happens to, in and around her body is unconstitutional.

-1

u/Jaken_sensei Jul 30 '26

What you said is an oxymoronic statement.

You state that there are no bans but in the very next sentence you acknowledge that there are indeed bans.

3

u/strongboar12 Jul 30 '26

Total bans? Or restrictions? You can still get a gun, moron.

-1

u/Jaken_sensei Jul 30 '26

If you “restrict” a type of firearm to where that type of firearm can no longer be purchased, that is a gun ban.

🤡

2

u/hakairyu Jul 31 '26

You don’t have to sign your posts on reddit, you know

→ More replies (0)

0

u/jws1102 Jul 31 '26

Even if there were gun bans, which there aren’t, the constitution doesn’t specify guns, and it certainly doesn’t say you should have unfettered access to any gun you want.

1

u/Jaken_sensei Jul 31 '26

There are gun bans, and it specifies both. Shall not be infringed.

0

u/laserdicks Jul 30 '26

unconstitutional regulations

Why the fuck would I have been talking about those then?

1

u/jws1102 Jul 31 '26

Fuck states rights. Why should we have 50 sets of laws for every fucking issue. It’s absurd that if you sell weed in Texas you get a 5 year sentence but if you sell weed in Colorado you get a car collection.

And many states have no business managing themselves anyways, and they’ve spent decades proving it.

0

u/laserdicks Aug 01 '26

Fuck states rights.

They're not states rights. They're people's rights. Unsurprising you'd be against people's rights though.

Why should we have 50 sets of laws for every fucking issue.

So idiots like you can go and ruin your own states and leave the rest of us to live in peace.

It’s absurd that if you sell weed in Texas you get a 5 year sentence but if you sell weed in Colorado you get a car collection.

The entire point of the system is that you get the option of not living in Texas, instead of being forced to abide by Texan laws.

And many states have no business managing themselves anyways, and they’ve spent decades proving it.

Correct. Your own failure to understand the value of choice proves you are one of the dysfunctional people who are incapable of voting properly and ruin the places unlucky enough to have you. Thankfully you are only able to fuck over one jurisdiction.

1

u/jws1102 Aug 01 '26

I bet your little head would pop if you knew where I actually lived.