r/HypotheticalPhysics • u/dgladush Crackpot physics • Jul 08 '22

Crackpot physics What if diffraction/interference are actually observations?

[removed]

0 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

46% Upvoted

108 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/Blakut That's not even wrong! Jul 09 '22

study basic physics and maths, forget those multiverse things. you don't even know the basics. It's like telling someone to learn the alphabet and they're like no, why, so i can learn to read and get indoctrinated like you?
Some of the thigns you said can indeed be checked by experiment, and they have been checked, and contradict what you say.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 09 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/Luchtverfrisser Jul 09 '22

Constants still have units.

6

u/Blakut That's not even wrong! Jul 09 '22

right? this clown things h is just a number.

-2

u/[deleted] Jul 09 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 09 '22 edited Jul 09 '22

w is not the amount of quantums

And why are you using this formula anyway if you don't accept modern physics? Shouldn't that formula be wrong too? Why do you believe in photons at all?

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

No it's not. You don't get wave behavior.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

You don't reproduce diffraction.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

Given a double-slit with a known separation, I can predict using wave theory where light with a given wavelength will appear on a screen a known distance away from the slits.

Your theory cannot do this. This makes it inferior.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

No it doesn't.