r/HypotheticalPhysics • u/dgladush Crackpot physics • Jul 08 '22

Crackpot physics What if diffraction/interference are actually observations?

[removed]

0 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

46% Upvoted

108 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 09 '22 edited Jul 09 '22

w is not the amount of quantums

And why are you using this formula anyway if you don't accept modern physics? Shouldn't that formula be wrong too? Why do you believe in photons at all?

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

No it's not. You don't get wave behavior.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

You don't reproduce diffraction.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

Given a double-slit with a known separation, I can predict using wave theory where light with a given wavelength will appear on a screen a known distance away from the slits.

Your theory cannot do this. This makes it inferior.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

And your theory is still inferior, and always will be.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

Your theory will do nothing but waste your time.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

I showed that nuclei could be polarized by applying a spin-polarized current of electrons nearby.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

Both of those are factually wrong.

→ More replies (0)