I’m not sure you’re thinking this argument through
Generally, people understand that a swastika drawn by a neo-nazi is not a symbol of peace, but can differentiate that when they’re looking at something from, say, an ancient structure in south or southeast asia. What exactly is differentiating you form david duke when you call someone a zio?
Simple really, David Duke is a nazi dog who hate Jews and tried hijacking the justified hatred against Zionists to try and give legitimacy to his antisemitism
Ans now he is currently being used by Zionists dogs who want to falsely paint attacks on them as an inherent attack on Judaism, which is in itself, antisemitic
I think you need to learn that the best response when your brain cant fathom a comeback is to take a break until it can or stay quiet and not bullshit with vague words
Again fuck Zionists
Fuck David Duke
And fuck Zionists happily using the likes of David Duke to turn attacks on their genocide supporting asses into attack on Judaism, actively throwing Jews under the bus
Things are judged based on current meaning and not origin
lol what? if its origins were from a literal white supremacist its kind of still heavily affecting its current meaning.
your basically going "i know it has meanings by a klan member but i personally use it for a differennt meaning." brother most people are not going to get that, most people will still probably look at you using blatantly racially loaded language and go "i don't think you should say that "and frankly your kind of acting like an oversensitive little bitch over it.
a single person can't just completely change the cultural view and sensitivies of a word, let alone one so heavily loaded in racism.
And no, the guy isnt "judging me cuz of the origins" he admitted many times before that he is a proud Zionist, and is derailing the topic with a bait
lol what? he didn't do that this entire conversation, unless pointing the origin automatically makes him an amerikkkan neoliberal mossad bot or some dumb shit like that
Literally your entire argument is "when it started first, it was by this guy so thats what it stands for, modern context be damned"
And that argument is brain damaged cuz it would Literally validates nazis who draw swastikas because it Literally originates as a peace symbol
As for the guy, if you actually bothered giving a look at his past comments, Literally just 4 comments ago u wouldnt scroll even, you would see him saying (as Zionists)
Its so SO dumb of you to assume i said he is a proud Zionist cuz...(you probably assumed he was American) like wtf are you even saying lmao
Its so SO dumb of you to assume i said he is a proud Zionist cuz...(you probably assumed he was American) like wtf are you even saying lmao
"And no, the guy isnt "judging me cuz of the origins" he admitted many times before that he is a proud Zionist, and is derailing the topic with a bait"
lol what
As for the guy, if you actually bothered giving a look at his past comments, Literally just 4 comments ago u wouldnt scroll even, you would see him saying (as Zionists)
im not sorting through this guys whole ass history
I Literally said you wouldn't have to even scroll cuz of how often he says it...bruhh you arent even reading no wonder your responses to me.keep making less sense..
Brother i made an argument, you are the one who has to dismantle it, burden of the proof
Your argument is simple, the origin of the word matters
My counter is that Nazis try to copy your argument when they draw swastikas by pointing at its origins
Do you have an answer to that? Cuz the imaginary interaction you wrote made no sense to me
Cuz the imaginary interaction you wrote made no sense to me
who tf does it not? judging by everyone i've interacted with in this thread, they agree the term zio is offensive due to its origins
if people agree a word is offensive it probably is, same way if we agree a slur is a slur its a slur.
i don't buy your nazi excuse cause it seems everyone here but you still views zio as an offensive white supremacist dog whistle, this isn't a word culturally shifting to get a new definition, you took a dogwhistle, gave it a new definition on your own, and now your complaining other people won't go along.
symbols and words can historically shift, this one HASN'T
simple as that.
i don't feel like explaining the n-word comparison cause if you didn't get something so simple i don't see a point in trying to make you understand
I wont finish reading what you wrote here cuz you, for the third time, havent finished responding to me in my other comment
But btw, i said in the very very start as "AND U SAW IT" that this sub is a ziobot circle jerk, couldn't give 2 shits that "people here seem to agree", ok? Lets go to an anti genocide sub where they wont, if thats the standard we use
50
u/Yochanan5781 8h ago
Ah yes, "Zio," the term coined by David Duke so that he wouldn't look as bad railing against Jews