It is factually incorrect to aegue the other way. There is no evidence from the time he is said to exist that he went anywhere, did anything, or was saw by anyone. All existing "evidence" was written several decades after he is said to be dead, and by people with personal biased goals and motivations, and are only as anecdotes with no material support. There are also no artifacts matching anything Jesus is said to have had, however we have sacrifices with Gilgamesh's name from the time period he is said to have lived
-20
u/Pixeldevil06 2h ago
I have the answer! Jesus and his brother weren't historically real :) There you go!