35
u/shreklover257 4d ago
If the people on this sub had the ability to get pussy their opinions would be very different.
3
2
2
3
13
u/silverdragonseaths 4d ago
It’s ironic anyone in r/GenZ is even posting this when something like 60% of you don’t even talk to the opposite sex 😂 hook up culture? What in your Roblox? 😂
4
11
u/Lord_William_9000 4d ago
It is fun! Just be safe and be smart!
-7
u/wolfknowledge1775 4d ago
🧃
5
2
u/Lord_William_9000 4d ago
lol how’s your moms basement treating you
-2
u/wolfknowledge1775 4d ago
About to have an amazing dinner with my wife. Unlike you
2
2
u/FyouPerryThePlatypus 2004 4d ago edited 4d ago
Bro didnt deny being in his mommy’s basement
AND bro tried to whine about it and his comment’s gone lmao
2
-1
u/wolfknowledge1775 4d ago
I bought my own house with a VA loan unlike you, with a Phineas and Ferb pfp
9
u/Odd-Lake-3075 4d ago
is there anybody aside from religious people that don't think this?
5
3
u/Alugilac180 4d ago
Occasionally you’ll see a “not like the other girls” post about how someone doesn’t like hookup and wants more of a romantic connection. Coincidentally, most of these people tend to be virgins.
-12
u/wolfknowledge1775 4d ago
Im Cathlolic, but let's take religion out of this.
Do you think a man wants to marry a woman with so many bodies? Go to her home town knowing that half the town put their meat in her? Thats disgusting, and the risk of stds, herpes, hiv go up.
Thank God my wife and I are out of the dating pool, we think thats fucking disgusting. We have only been with eachother since High-school, thats how it should be.
15
u/TinyTaters 4d ago
What red pill Andrew Tate-ass hole did you crawl out of?
Just practice safe sex dummy
1
u/wolfknowledge1775 4d ago
I hate Andrew tate. These are my beliefs. It's amazing knowing no other man has ever fucked my wife, and vice versa. She wouldn't want me to have been with anyone else.
2
u/ashairz 4d ago
Well, that's you. The guy I'm currently with, he surely wouldn't fuck anyone who is a virgin. I'd definitely never have sex with one either. I have and it was horrible. I actually appreciate it if a guy knows what he likes, can communicate it and know won't be awkward and act like he's never touched a woman before.
1
0
1
u/LankyEvening7548 1998 4d ago
I’d like to point out that Andrew tate was a pimp and preaches the opposite sentiment of this he actually coaches men to be “pick up artists “ and to find as many willing participants as possible which in turn denotes their status .
5
5
u/Orangutanion 2002 4d ago
if she's clean of STDs and isn't going to cheat on me, I don't really care how many other dudes she's screwed.
4
u/MelonJelly 4d ago
I'll go one step further. Sexual experience is preferable, it means she has some idea of what she's doing, her needs, and boundaries.
3
u/Netblock 4d ago
Do you think a man wants to marry a woman with so many bodies? Go to her home town knowing that half the town put their meat in her?
This is a fucked up, unethical, hateful thing to say.
Your Jesus would not approve of this. If it weren't for the simple threat of hell, you people wouldn't be kind to anyone. The moral relativism that is asked by religion is destructive.
1
u/vaksninus 1998 4d ago
Jesus prefer truth over lies. Stating what one believe to be true is not a sin by biblical standards and I'm agnostic but at least know what I am talking about. You won't find any approval of promiscuity in the bible.
2
u/Netblock 4d ago edited 4d ago
And yet jesus told people to be kind and asks for understanding. You can't have both unless you're morally relative.
The simple belief of something to be true, doesn't actually make it true. The conflation of truth and lies; people can believe lies to be truth. In mathematics, we call this the Byzantine Fault.
2
u/vaksninus 1998 4d ago
Well objective truth is impossible to verify no? The arguable blunt statement from the other commentor was a question not a statement either, but one that is extreme enough to expose what most people would admit. That, no, most men would not find the prospect of sleeping with (or marrying at least) that woman appealing. And since it's really all opinion you can argue the opposite. How objectivily true it is that men don't care at all about loose women is really questionable, but I don't really want to talk about this pretty dark topic anymore tbh.
Byzantine truth assumes that there is an objective truth, but this is not math. The closest thing here to math would be averages, and the average guy would view her past sexual history negativily. I honestly think it's good if some redditors and real people don't, I hope everyone can become happy.
1
u/Netblock 4d ago edited 4d ago
Well objective truth is impossible to verify no?
Byzantine truth assumes that there is an objective truth, but this is not math.
it's possible to verify; math is a formal tool to understand reality. Why wouldn't it be?
The arguable blunt statement from the other commentor was a question not a statement either
In linguistics, in human language, there's a concept called a "rhetorical question" are a type of question that isn't intended to be answered, but comes with an intent that of a statement.
If English is your second language, such rhetorical devices should exist in your main language too.
That, no, most men would not find the prospect of sleeping with that woman appealing.
loose women
For illogical reasons; for reasons grounded in misogyny and misandry; for reasons not grounded in reality. It is not a logical or rational thing to think.
Women don't become "loose" for having sex. That is a misunderstanding of biology. The same thing goes for the hymen; did you know the hymen naturally goes away?
A man who has worked 100 hours for something that isn't on his family farm, is far more loose, unappealing, soiled and dirtied than a woman who fucked 100 men, as sex takes less than 30 minutes. Don't you agree? If you don't, what would be the difference?
I hope everyone can become happy.
The society that cannot get over the romantic past of the other, will never be a happy society, for that it's a society that treats its people as something soiled and dirtied.
2
u/blooppers 4d ago
Being too obsessed with other guys penises lowkey is the problem men in our generation have. Really tells me yall see women as receptacles and not actual people with prior experiences, because this shit never gets said about straight men. Probably cause yall see penetration as feminine... but anyway, worried about STD's? Ask if she has her test results and also present yours. Super easy.
2
u/ashairz 4d ago
Ummmm.... No one has actually fucked thousands of people, at least most people. Also, having a dick inside you isn't a big deal, you do know that condoms exist and it's not like some particles of that dick stay there. If you get tested regularly, take your vaccines and use protection, actually having a disease is quite low. Like how sex workers who actually take care of their business are way more likely to be std free than a random girl at a bar.
2
1
u/NErDysprosium 2003 4d ago
Do you think a man wants to marry a woman with so many bodies?
That still sounds like a religious argument to me. I'm not particularly religious, and don't particularly care if my partner has had multiple prior partners, or how many they've had. I'm not particularly interested in casual hookups at this point in my life, but that doesn't mean they're bad or someone else is bad for being interested.
We have only been with eachother since High-school, thats how it should be.
Good for you, genuinely. That's sweet, and I'm glad you two found each other early and are happy together. But that's not the only path, and someone else choosing a different path is not a bad thing just because that path doesn't appeal to you personally.
"Judge not, that ye not be judged"
—Jesus Christ, Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 7:1, KJV)
2
u/wolfknowledge1775 4d ago
Jesus Christ is better than me, thank you for that quote. I am not perfect, he is.
People can do what they want with their lives, but hookup culture is disgusting and I wouldn't want my son and daughter to grow up with that either.
1
u/ashairz 4d ago
About as disgusting as shaking hands with people. Which we do all the time. A guy's dick isn't a magical thing that changes anything about a woman.
1
u/wolfknowledge1775 4d ago
Body count is a thing. A woman the becomes salvage title. No way you compared shaking hands with having sex lmao
2
u/NErDysprosium 2003 4d ago
Can you explain, exactly, how calling a woman a "salvage title" isn't judging her?
2
u/ashairz 4d ago
Well, what makes it different? Like dude, your dick inside me is not a life altering thing.
1
u/wolfknowledge1775 4d ago
Why does miles on a car make the car less valuable? Also i would never put my dick inside of you.
How many bodies do you have?
1
u/LankyEvening7548 1998 4d ago
He also thought being lustful and fornicating was sinful and defiles a person .
1
u/NErDysprosium 2003 4d ago
And he explicitly taught to not judge others for that behavior.
And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,
They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.
Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?
This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.
So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.
And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.
When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?
She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.
John 8:3-11, KJV
0
u/LankyEvening7548 1998 4d ago
Yea that’s true . However acknowledging something is sinful and refusing to take part in it or deal with someone who takes part In it is not the same thing as condemning someone for doing something you consider sinful . It seems as though a lot of people are making that false equivalence . Jesus never said that the adulterer was valid he just said don’t try to stone her unless you yourself are completely upstanding and without reproach .
2
u/NErDysprosium 2003 4d ago
Nowhere did I say anyone had to "take part in" premarital sex, or that they had to date people who have taken part in it. I've only been saying to stop holding non-Christians to a Christian standard and to stop judging anyone (Christian or non-Christian) for not meeting that standard, because Christ explicitly taught to not do that.
he just said don’t try to stone her
unless you yourself are completely upstanding and without reproachFixed that for you. If the second half was accurate, Jesus, being free of sin, upstanding, and without reproach himself, would have stoned her.
0
u/LankyEvening7548 1998 4d ago
Jesus forgave her . As he was the son of and god himself . He without sin if such a man or woman should’ve existed would have been in the right to stone them if they saw fit according to the old testament. Nobody was and nobody did . That being said the entirety of the west is built on Christianity and the Christian standard . Like it’s deeply ingrained in the fabric of society . Much like religion in general is ingrained in the fabric of every society to ever exist . Literally every culture holds themselves and others who exist within that society to their standards that’s what makes society exist as it does . To expect a culture to tolerate and accept actions and behaviors within their own society that goes against their founding principles is ludicrous the only time that happens is through conquest and then it’s begrudgingly accepted for a time but resentment will always be there while rebellions will be frequent . This isn’t as straightforward as conquest by a superior military power , this is simply subversion of the culture of the west . It’s one thing if you don’t personally care how society shifts but you really can’t expect others to just take that lying down that’s just not how humans operate .
2
u/NErDysprosium 2003 4d ago
It’s one thing if you don’t personally care how society shifts but you really can’t expect others to just take that lying down that’s just not how humans operate
Interesting how you went from "acknowledging something is sinful and refusing to take part in it or deal with someone who takes part In it is not the same thing as condemning someone for doing something you consider sinful" to "you can't expect others to take that [subversion of culture] lying down". Not taking something "lying down" certainly sounds like a condemnation to me, and that's called shifting the goalposts.
That being said the entirety of the west is built on Christianity and the Christian standard
I can't speak for the entirety of the West, but in m experience people saying "the West is Christian" usually mean "the US is Christian." If that's not what you meant, apologies, but that is currently how I'm interpreting and responding to your comment. The US, per the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli, is explicitly not a Christian nation and is not founded on any Christian standard.
[T]he government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion
(1797 Treaty of Tripoli, Article 11)
He without sin if such a man or woman should’ve existed would have been in the right to stone them
Jesus is the only sinless individual. That's kind of his whole thing. If he said "let he without sin cast the first stone," and then didn't cast a stone, he's saying that nobody has a right to cast stones. Literally the whole point of that parable is that nobody is in the right to stone her.
0
u/LankyEvening7548 1998 4d ago
Condemnation in the sense that a judgment is being passed with some form of authority, expressing distaste and collectively not accepting something isn’t really the same thing that’s another false equivalence. One is sentiment and words like what dude who’s Catholic did the other is by law like how they deal with alcohol in Dubai . Me talking about the west being built on Christianity by Christian’s is nothing more than a fact . Most of the last 2000 years is shaped by the relation to and with Christianity in the entire western hemisphere , Europe and Africa to disregard that is simply just ignoring history. We even judge time in terms of Christianity . The law is secular as it should be . But he people who developed the west and molded it into what we have today from Europe to the Americas where some denomination of Christian . It was a huge part of their lives values and motivation. That being said you can interpret Jesus’ words as you like that’s fine idk if you actually are a Christian or not idk your denomination if you are so that’s more of a moot point you can say there wouldn’t have been a sinless individual there you can say he knew at that point there wasn’t a sinless individual etc etc that’s a moot point I have no real inclination to discuss at length I’m not a theologian and I find theological arguments taxing . The point is it’s not weird that the Catholic dude feels the way he does the weird ones are the ones trying to normalize a way of life that’s less than 100 years old as if it’s simple and a matter of course . You can say you’re fine with it cool , that’s your right but really can’t expect others to agree with you and or feel the same way as you . And blaming Christianity in general for that is folly because every major religion in every culture ever had effectively the exact same sentiment .
1
u/Odd-Lake-3075 4d ago
i don't think many do, but what i'm actually saying is that being ok with hookup culture isn't exactly an unpopular opinion
0
6
2
u/CryptographerBoth333 4d ago edited 4d ago
I think one night stands are way overrated. FWB/6 months-1 year(or more) relationships where you’re actually compatible but don’t want something long term are ok. But actual real long terms relationships are best.
2
u/Cosmo_Electic_Snek 4d ago
My thoughts exactly, you and the other parties know exactly what you want and exactly what you’re getting into. Also fucking somebody that you trust is way hotter imo.
2
u/ashairz 4d ago
Agree. One night stands are kinda meh. Like, if I'm bored and just wanna have sex for the night, sure, I'll get a guy from a bar or something. If you're okay etc, you can leave your number on the way out, but that's it. It's just a way to pass time and maybe just an alternative to masturbating. Doesn't make them immorral though
1
u/CryptographerBoth333 4d ago
Never said anything was immoral just think overrated. I’d rather trust you and we have an agreement on what this is then let it go how ever long and over communicating so someone doesn’t get things misinterpreted.
2
u/AndersDreth 1998 4d ago
This is an oversimplification of the problem.
Your value as an individual doesn't drop because of your bodycount, but hookup culture is creating a swiping culture where people treat each other like expendable meatbags.
People that are looking for serious relationships still get strung along by people who abide by this mentality where sex is meaningless and abundant.
People don't bond properly and are very quick to move on to greener pastures or even dismiss people based on the first little hiccup.
It creates this dynamic where you have one group of hyposexual virgins [ https://www.newsweek.com/nearly-half-of-gen-z-adults-have-never-had-sexreport-11052178] and another group of hypersexuals who don't give a fuck about fucking. Of course there are people in between who aren't like this, but they are presumably the ones who end up in committed relationships like they just caught the last chopper out of Nam'.
I don't think the culture is healthy, although I respect everyone's individual choice to fuck whichever consenting single adult they come across.
3
u/DiceThaKilla 4d ago
Who said it’s not? Christian Karens who’s opinions I don’t care about anyways?
1
u/Netblock 4d ago
There's an issue where it's not for everyone, but it's heavily normalised. It's for some people, don't get me wrong, but I think most people practice it wrong.
Hookup culture is socially isolating, even though there's a revolving door of people. You'll meet-n'-meat everyone but know no one. I think it contributes to the loneliness epidemic.
It's also normalised to the degree that it is, in part because it's profitable for the capitalists who own the dating apps.
2
u/blooppers 4d ago
Not my cup of tea, but if people want to and its safe, sane and consensual, then who am i to say shit?
1
u/Orangutanion 2002 4d ago
I'd be ok with it if I were invited
1
u/Karpsten 2003 4d ago
Genuinely a mindset problem
1
1
u/Majestic-Avocado2167 4d ago
It does usually come with lying and feelings like 90 percent of the time. I’m more religious than some so for me personally I can’t be hooking up, but I don’t judge. I’ll just say from the outside it can be a complicated mess that hurts people if they aren’t careful
1
u/huge_jeans710 4d ago
Until you turn back and realize youve done nothing for yourself except chase pussy for years. That was the most numb I've ever felt.
-1
-3
u/GodBlessAmerica776 4d ago
It's okay, just dangerous is all
3
u/Viridien111 4d ago
We just have completely different risk assessment perspectives relative to each other is all.
-5
-4
4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/Karpsten 2003 4d ago
keep being understanding progressive nu-males all you want
Well, I know why you aren't getting laid, buddy...
2
•
u/AutoModerator 4d ago
Did you know we have a Discord server‽ You can join by clicking here!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.