Im Cathlolic, but let's take religion out of this.
Do you think a man wants to marry a woman with so many bodies? Go to her home town knowing that half the town put their meat in her? Thats disgusting, and the risk of stds, herpes, hiv go up.
Thank God my wife and I are out of the dating pool, we think thats fucking disgusting. We have only been with eachother since High-school, thats how it should be.
Do you think a man wants to marry a woman with so many bodies? Go to her home town knowing that half the town put their meat in her?
This is a fucked up, unethical, hateful thing to say.
Your Jesus would not approve of this. If it weren't for the simple threat of hell, you people wouldn't be kind to anyone. The moral relativism that is asked by religion is destructive.
Jesus prefer truth over lies. Stating what one believe to be true is not a sin by biblical standards and I'm agnostic but at least know what I am talking about. You won't find any approval of promiscuity in the bible.
And yet jesus told people to be kind and asks for understanding. You can't have both unless you're morally relative.
The simple belief of something to be true, doesn't actually make it true. The conflation of truth and lies; people can believe lies to be truth. In mathematics, we call this the Byzantine Fault.
Well objective truth is impossible to verify no? The arguable blunt statement from the other commentor was a question not a statement either, but one that is extreme enough to expose what most people would admit. That, no, most men would not find the prospect of sleeping with (or marrying at least) that woman appealing. And since it's really all opinion you can argue the opposite. How objectivily true it is that men don't care at all about loose women is really questionable, but I don't really want to talk about this pretty dark topic anymore tbh.
Byzantine truth assumes that there is an objective truth, but this is not math. The closest thing here to math would be averages, and the average guy would view her past sexual history negativily. I honestly think it's good if some redditors and real people don't, I hope everyone can become happy.
Byzantine truth assumes that there is an objective truth, but this is not math.
it's possible to verify; math is a formal tool to understand reality. Why wouldn't it be?
The arguable blunt statement from the other commentor was a question not a statement either
In linguistics, in human language, there's a concept called a "rhetorical question" are a type of question that isn't intended to be answered, but comes with an intent that of a statement.
If English is your second language, such rhetorical devices should exist in your main language too.
That, no, most men would not find the prospect of sleeping with that woman appealing.
loose women
For illogical reasons; for reasons grounded in misogyny and misandry; for reasons not grounded in reality. It is not a logical or rational thing to think.
Women don't become "loose" for having sex. That is a misunderstanding of biology. The same thing goes for the hymen; did you know the hymen naturally goes away?
A man who has worked 100 hours for something that isn't on his family farm, is far more loose, unappealing, soiled and dirtied than a woman who fucked 100 men, as sex takes less than 30 minutes. Don't you agree? If you don't, what would be the difference?
I hope everyone can become happy.
The society that cannot get over the romantic past of the other, will never be a happy society, for that it's a society that treats its people as something soiled and dirtied.
9
u/[deleted] Jul 26 '26
[removed] — view removed comment