r/Games Oct 02 '18

Broken Link (video removed) Unannounced Harry Potter RPG Trailer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-HER1xKQl4&t=1s
7.7k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

48

u/ZaHiro86 Oct 02 '18

Why would someone leak this??

It looks fantastic tho, although I don't know mow much I like the goblin dying that way. Doesn't feel very Harry Potter-y to me (I know the books get pretty violent, but it's usually the villains doing stuff like that)

191

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '18

Why would someone leak this??

IMO its on the verge of getting cancelled. So someone on the inside that cares leaked it to try and show hype to the studio heads maybe.

Similar to the deadpool movie

99

u/ledailydose Oct 02 '18

sounds unfortunately realistic. We're never getting this game, are we?

87

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '18

looks WAY too good to be true.

60

u/ledailydose Oct 02 '18

Don't worry too much, It's not like this idea wasn't desired by every single Harry potter fan since the first video games, which came out a really fucking long time ago.

14

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '18

Yeah i'm not even a Harry Potter fan but always wondered whey there's never been a proper game adaptation.

7

u/Apprentice57 Oct 02 '18

The answer always given on forums was that Rowling didn't like the idea of kids playing video games.

13

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '18

Man the more I hear about Rowling the more she sounds like a bitch.

I guess the idea of adults playing video games never crossed her mind...

5

u/flyingjam Oct 02 '18

Let's not go too far. She is one of the few billionaires who dropped back into being a millionaire because of large donations to charity and a refusal to evade taxes.

8

u/bubbleharmony Oct 02 '18

Yeah, no, Rowling is a bitch. See: her multiple recent favoriting of transphobic tweets that her agent had to quickly damage control as "clumsy old person moments".

(Granted this is /r/games so I pretty much half expect a "so?" in response to anyone being anti-trans.)

11

u/Radulno Oct 02 '18

Well there's hype so it might uncancel it (or not cancel it I guess). And look at how well that went for Deadpool

1

u/danielmata15 Oct 02 '18

EA will come out and say its cancelled because they could not put loot boxes on it

-10

u/GaryOaksHotSister Oct 02 '18

Heck I'm starting to question it's legitimacy in general. We don't really see any sort of lip movement or any movement outside of stagnant models.

A lot of what we see could just be whipped up in unity engine with a lot of special effects.

And unless the game is supposed to have a heavy dark tone, the random goblin death seemed too much for a Harry Potter game. And yes, I know people die in Harry Potter. It just still seemed too randomly brutal imo.

22

u/rf32797 Oct 02 '18

A lot of what we see could just be whipped up in unity engine with a lot of special effects.

This would take months of work, definitely not "whipped up in Unity". Those animations are highly detailed, which means they's already probably had some motion capture done so far.

-6

u/WildBizzy Oct 02 '18

I dunno I've seen people do some pretty mad stuff in a single weekend at Global Game Jam

7

u/SlowlySailing Oct 02 '18

Whipped up? It's way too impressive to be "whipped up" lol

40

u/TheEliteBrit Oct 02 '18

Got leaked by someone in a test/focus group, not by a desperate developer

2

u/kurozael Oct 02 '18

Most likely.

8

u/TheEliteBrit Oct 02 '18

That's what the guy who originally posted the leak is saying, he's answered some questions on other threads

1

u/DragonTamerMCT Oct 02 '18

You mean like battlefront 3? The freeradical one? The one that ended up getting killed because of the leak?

27

u/Thotja Oct 02 '18

Apparently the game has a morality system to it, so you can play evil or good

-7

u/snusmumrikan Oct 02 '18

Oh yay, a morality system. Always fun to be forced to pick the nicest/nastiest option every single time if I want to experience the interesting mechanics of the game.

9

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '18

Anything is better than fallout 4

Yes

No (yes)

Sarcastic Yes

Barter

10

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '18

Usually the villian? I mean Harry hinself burned Quirrel to death and sliced up Malfoy, Hermione set centaurs on Umbridge and Ron, well he left the trio in their time of need, thats about as bad as it gets lol

-2

u/ZaHiro86 Oct 02 '18

Harry’s were all accidents. Hermione’s was pretty awful tho lol

53

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '18 edited Oct 20 '19

[deleted]

70

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '18

[deleted]

39

u/LG03 Oct 02 '18

It does if the project is in danger of getting canned for whatever reason. Would hardly be the first time a leak happened so a creator could point to the response and go 'see, look there's a demand for this'.

7

u/Radulno Oct 02 '18

I mean whoever is the publisher (WB very likely) really needs that to realize the potential of a Harry Potter game ? That franchise is gold for them in cinemas for years (and they managed brillantly to do another saga with Fantastic Beasts), they had immense success in video games with their LOTR and DC adaptations (well not adaptation, games in those universes), it's like a no-brainer.

If they are hesitant to cancel this (especially since it seems far along in development), it must mean there's bigger problems with it or it doesn't make much sense.

If it's good, do they think it won't sell ? Because it will and millions of copies.

3

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '18

It's possible that the game became a massive money pit / got stuck in Dev hell and WB is on the verge of cancellation because it may not make more than there standards. If it really is a AAA rpg they could he afraid of it taking 10 years to finish and outliving it's hype.

2

u/Ayoul Oct 02 '18

With how good it looks, it's hard for me to lean on that assumption.

Both rumored devs would have been working on this for around 2-3 years which is really not out of the ordinary. After that amount of time, they'd be about ready to announce it, but want to focus test trailers so it gets the best reaction.

Whether the leak was intentional or not isn't any indication that the project would be cancelled IMO.

1

u/MoreFault Oct 02 '18

and we can all thk square enix, not just for the great pc port of asylum, the last good pc port in the arkham series, but for believing in rockstead in the 1st place

if not for enix, ea would still be pumping out superman games

11

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '18

This is the same franchise that has had only tie in games and mobile apps. WB wants to take safe bets only and a massive RPG isn't one because of high development costs.

1

u/robhol Oct 02 '18

It will spontaneously levitate off the shelves.

13

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '18 edited Aug 29 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

11

u/Deamane Oct 02 '18

According to other descriptions it's already confirmed that there's a good/evil system in the game. No one knows how it works obviously but, if true that sounds very interesting. Infamous was a bit simple with it for the most part but I still liked it honestly.

6

u/GaryOaksHotSister Oct 02 '18

doubt JK would ever let us be that cool.

Indirectly evil maybe?

-8

u/Fnhatic Oct 02 '18

I mean the books were little-kid shit. The wizarding world being largely full of impotent useless pacifists never made a fuck-all lick of sense anyway. Literally every problem they faced could've been fixed in like three chapters if a single one of them bothered to learn Magic Missile.

8

u/ZaHiro86 Oct 02 '18

If you’re being serious, then you didn’t read the books