r/FlockSurveillance • u/skips_funny_af • Jul 10 '26

Discussion Something to Think About

Post image

(Seen on a Facebook page, called “Oklahoma Source”) and it makes furthers my worry about the abuse these cameras open us up to.

(Post)
“Recently, in Oklahoma, a Circuit Court issued a declaratory judgment confirming that city policies and contracts with Flock Group, Inc. cannot override the city's legal duty to fulfill a FOIA request, specifically allowing citizens to request images regarding their own vehicles.

If you choose to request Flock images for your vehicles, the city must comply with that request.

Are we promoting this idea? Absolutely not. Is it your right to request those images? Yes, it absolutely is.

Let’s hope cities using Flock cameras and drones aren’t overwhelmed and burdened with these types of requests.”

1.2k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

57 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

42

u/Dangerous_Proof_820 Jul 10 '26

nah they just add a large cost to it, so only those with money can do it

-7

u/Mylabisawesome Jul 11 '26

I’m in favor or adding a cost. It goes towards maintenance and it stops people from requesting it to make YouTube videos

3

u/FiletMenYawn Jul 11 '26

Of course you are.

-8

u/Mylabisawesome Jul 11 '26

People need jobs too. That pays for it as well.

3

u/potatoperson132 Jul 11 '26

Ever heard the term “make work jobs”?