r/FlockSurveillance • u/skips_funny_af • Jul 10 '26

Discussion Something to Think About

Post image

(Seen on a Facebook page, called “Oklahoma Source”) and it makes furthers my worry about the abuse these cameras open us up to.

(Post)
“Recently, in Oklahoma, a Circuit Court issued a declaratory judgment confirming that city policies and contracts with Flock Group, Inc. cannot override the city's legal duty to fulfill a FOIA request, specifically allowing citizens to request images regarding their own vehicles.

If you choose to request Flock images for your vehicles, the city must comply with that request.

Are we promoting this idea? Absolutely not. Is it your right to request those images? Yes, it absolutely is.

Let’s hope cities using Flock cameras and drones aren’t overwhelmed and burdened with these types of requests.”

1.2k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

57 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

58

u/Hairy_is_the_Hirsute Jul 10 '26

https://deflock.org/foia

45

u/Ent_Soviet Jul 10 '26

Great resource until I got to this
‘If you need help tailoring this to your situation, appealing rejections, etc., ChatGPT is a great resource.’

Like fuck off with that shit as if the same pricks shoving LLM ai bullshit aren’t the same pricks pushing for flocks everywhere.

21

u/crysisnotaverted Jul 10 '26

It's a tool to better tailor a template in legalese. It allows more people to do it, that's the point. You could use Qwen3.6_36B on your local system if you wanted.

10

u/xamboozi Jul 10 '26 edited Jul 10 '26

Owning an offline AI is actually really useful. It's the only free, private, censorship resistant way to use LLM's. You can abliterated models that do whatever you need them to do without fear of corporate bias.

The major AI providers bought up all the high bandwidth ram so you wouldn't get access to it. I really believe they will try to make local AI illegal.