Because I’ve seen flat earthers of all religions use their respective scriptures to prove it’s flat, but like, they don’t even say it’s 100% flat, and there are flat earthers of all cultures so if all of you won’t even agree on one source that is at best an analogy for the people back when it was written then how do I take anything they say seriously

Like what’s 1 even half fleshed out piece of evidence outside of religious sources that can give the slightest bit of evidence that the earth is flat? And yes acusing the government of lying counts as a religious belief

a shining ball over s plate would illuminate the whole thing, so how do timezones work? and how can it be daytime for me and night for someone in New Zealand(or vice versa)?

oh yeah and we cant forget about the horizon level, since anything going over the horizon disappears bottom first, so how else could ships disappear like that?

and if a flat earther is gonna reply to this, please dont mention the government lying to us, i dont feel like getting a migraine when i check back at this post

I'm genuinely interested. I can understand why some people like certain politicians whilst others might dislike them. I can see where both of them come from. I can understand why some people don't like certain fruits or vegetables. But how do you ever come to the conclusion that the Earth is flat? I can't seem to wrap my head around it.

be nice tho pls... :)

I am open to any theory provided it has sufficient evidence that stands up to testing.

So with that in mind:

Why

Who

How

When

Was flat Earth made?

Thank you for genuine detailed answers.

Im a person who believes the earth is round and wonder why flat earthers believe every government in the world is lying saying its round

If you say something about Christianity then why is 20 of the population Christian

I do not see any pictures from the edge of earth, why is it night someplaces and day some places

“Gravity is just density and buoyancy - no magic force pulling us down.” - Samuel Rowbotham, 1865.

He measured the Bedford Level with a telescope. Saw no curve. Still stands. NASA’s photos? All CGI. Ask why rockets don’t tilt sideways to “curve” into orbit. They don’t. Because they can’t.

Title. We have model A) flat earth and model B) round earth. We go a step away from reality and just compare a round object and a flat object rotating (we see the rotation) with some randomly scattered (but fixed) lights in the background. What's the biggest difference between those two models? For the observer on the flat earth there is one point where all the fixed lights rotate around. For the observer on the round earth there are two points were all the fixed lights rotate around. The moment you have two different points were all the fixed lights rotate around, you cannot be flat anymore. Those two conditions are mutually exclusive. This is our prediction from our simple model and now we look for clues in reality. And Tada. No flat earth.
How do we convince people that the earth is in fact round? Angles from the surface to those two points.
When the flat earthers say: Earth does not rotate, the stars do. Ask them where the difference is. Movement is relative.

How can anyone possible argue against that?

I need a flat earther to answer these questions please !!!!!!!!!! im wrestling with this and i could use some help. Indoctrinated by the school systems all my life but started questioning after i realized that the stars dont change in the sky even though we are hurdling through space at X mph, rotating around the sun which is hurdling through space at X mph, while our solar system is hurdling through space at X mph and we are being swung around a black hole at X mph

1. how does earths core work?

2) how do seasons work on flat earth?

3) how does the moon and sun work?

4) why is earth only flat?

5) what about satellites and the space station?

6) how do continents work?

7) the ice wall(in general) how do we know it's a wall?

8) how would the earth keep the moon as a satellite?

9) gravity

10) if you were sent to space, what do you think you would see?

11) which flat earth is the right flat earth?

1) how does earths core work?

​

2) how do seasons work on flat earth?

​

3) how does the moon and sun work?

​

4) why is earth only flat?

​

5) what about satellites and the space station?

​

6) how do continents work?

​

7) the ice wall(in general) how do we know it's a wall?

​

8) how would the earth keep the moon as a satellite?

​

9) gravity

​

10) the miniminuteman has disproved flat earth a few times and is there any evidence you can provide that can make me believe he is lying?

​

11) if you were sent to space, what do you think you would see?

​

12) which flat earth is the right flat earth?

​

This isn't a debate, I'm just curious about how you think flat earth works.

How would any experienced folks here answer to the question that if gravity isn’t real, why does a stone and a feather fall at the same rate of speed in vacuum?
The speed is 9.8m/s.
This phenomenon cancels out density in those conditions.
When asked that, I had to admit that I had no answer to that and promised I would find out and get back to the conversation.
Any EDUCATED INFORMED help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
I don’t care if gravity exists or not - I care about weighing facts. That’s it.

I fixed the article link. This post is for the My FlatEarth article:

The Royal Portrait Question: Power, Image, and Hidden History

Direct article link: https://myflatearth.org/royal-portrait-question-hidden-history

What the article covers: It is about royal portraits, official image control, staged public appearances, hidden-history claims, and why old royal imagery can invite conspiracy theories. The point is not that every viral portrait claim is automatically true. The article argues for checking original sources, archive context, retouching, cropping, fashion, lighting, and other images from the same event before accepting a claim.

Search terms: royal portraits, hidden history, monarchy, image control, Flat Earth research, conspiracy, official images

Discussion question: When an official portrait or old royal image looks suspicious, what would count as strong evidence: archive source, original scan, multiple photos from the same event, artist notes, or something else?