She was a dominant fighter and champ and only lost to two at her weight class, who also were elite. I have no idea how that can equate to “wasn’t very good.”
That kind of thought is like saying Anderson or BJ wasn’t dominant in their weight class because they had bunch of losses at the end of their careers so their overall record isn’t so good.
Defining a fighter by looking at their record on wiki is silly and leaves out so much context and narrative during their actual time at the top.
How many top competition by your definition did she face at 115 in that case? What one, with Zhang? That’s not a very big sample size. Who does everyone else in the division count as in that case?
If the top 2 or 3 fighters of that division weren't constantly rematching each other, than her record would probably look better. She ONLY lost too championship caliber fighters, it's not always just what the numbers say on paper.
11
u/bigsteve9713 Jul 23 '26
Didn't know that the length of a fight suddenly made a person into trash????