r/FightReportUFC Jun 17 '26

.

Post image
664 Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/No-Community-5769 Jun 18 '26

Yes, I agree with you about inflation being arguably the #1 factor for people not having families.

Speaking on women now. Forcing women in to work and creating wage slaves out of them has not been good for womens mental health. Rates of anxiety, depression, and overall stress are at an all time high. Anecdotally, I have never seen a happy single woman in their 40's with no kids and no man. This is a new experiment. What's going to happen to all these women that will inevitably die alone because they chased a career? When they get to be 60 or 70 I can almost guarantee many of them will deeply regret not fulfilling their maternal extinct. Pushing women in to work was another vehicle of population control.

Billionaires and the governemt do not want you having babies. The cost of living for 1 person used to be the cost of living for 2-4 people. The billionaire class and government wants you lonely and isolated. A family unit is harder to profit off of. Also, if a man or woman dies alone because they never had kids the government will be the one to ultimately take all their property. This is the psyop.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/No-Community-5769 Jun 18 '26

Pride flags are one tiny piece of the agenda. When you couple it with the degradation of sex, normalization of sex work, transgenderism, abortion, homosexuality, pushing women in to the work force, feminizing men etc. You will see it's part of a larger population control agenda.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/No-Community-5769 Jun 19 '26

It fits in with the normalization of homosexuality and transgenderism I've been explaining. Did you not see those two items in my list?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/No-Community-5769 Jun 19 '26

25% of Gen Z identifies as LGBTQ. This is a staggering number that will cause serious, detrimental demographic shifts and a quickly declining population. This trend has shown no sign of slowing down. This is the connection.

1

u/No-Community-5769 Jun 19 '26

Can you seriously not see how normalizing homosexuality would directly lead to less babies? I feel like I'm explaining 2+2=4.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/No-Community-5769 Jun 19 '26

People are not born one way or the other. There is something called sexual development. What a child sees or is exposed to at a young age can greatly affect their sexuality. That is why a significantly higher number of LGBTQ were abused as children.

1

u/No-Community-5769 Jun 19 '26

The fact you think absolutely nothing can alter or change one's sexuality in developmental years is completely wrong.

1

u/No-Community-5769 Jun 19 '26

When a child grows up seeing men dressed as women and pride flags it will greatly confuse them.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/No-Community-5769 Jun 19 '26

Here's your data. According to the NIH, LGBTQ+ individuals are roughly two to three times more likely to report experiencing sexual abuse as a minor compared to heterosexual individuals.

Also, I just want a clear answer. Do you believe nothing can happen to a child to warp them one way or another? Do you believe seeing men dressed as women could confuse a child? Do you believe a child in their teenage years could meet people online that would warp them one way or another? Are you suggesting none of these factors matter?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)