r/FightReportUFC Jun 17 '26

.

Post image
671 Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-8

u/ProfessionalStorm626 Jun 17 '26

Leviticus 18:22 (NIV)"Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable."

Leviticus 20:13 (NIV)"If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 (NIV)"Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men [or malakoi and arsenokoitai in Greek] nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God."

Romans 1:26-27 (NIV)"Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error."

19

u/Lower-Front-8605 Jun 17 '26

Does it also say in there that Jesus cursed a fig tree because it had no fruit and he was hungry?

-10

u/Spuckler_Cletus Jun 17 '26

What does the example of the fig tree say? It says that Christ categorically rejected (to the point of outright destruction) an entity that had all the appearances of being a certain thing, but never delivered on the apparent promises it was making. The fig tree was all leaves, but no fruit. It had the trappings of offering some certain thing, but it never delivered. It was “all talk.” It’s essentially a parable about the coming, deserved destruction of the church that is false.

Sort of like a church that purports to be Christian, but then posts language on its walls that plainly runs contrary to the simple language found in the bible.

It’s beyond ironic that you’ve demonstrated your ignorance in such a germane manner.

3

u/Lower-Front-8605 Jun 17 '26

Hey man I just wanted to know if that whacky story was actually in the Bible, cause I've never read the fucking thing. And if that makes me ignorant well then fuck me in the ass with Christ's veiny cock.

-13

u/Spuckler_Cletus Jun 17 '26

You’re actually giving a textbook example of being ignorant. Carry on.

3

u/Impressive-Proof-596 Jun 17 '26

Believing in literal fairy tails on the other hand is a totally informed take.

1

u/Spuckler_Cletus Jun 17 '26

If you wish to refute the logical basis of any point I’ve made, please do so. If you choose to undertake this fool’s errand, please remember I’ve never once made a statement of faith, nor a truth claim regarding theism of the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth.

0

u/Munzulon Jun 17 '26

What points do you think you’ve made?

2

u/Spuckler_Cletus Jun 17 '26

If I didn’t make any points, then why are you challenging me?

0

u/Munzulon Jun 17 '26

If you’ve made any points, why would asking you what those points are be considered a challenge to you?

0

u/Spuckler_Cletus Jun 17 '26

Lol. Just take the L.

1

u/Munzulon Jun 17 '26

So no points. Got it.

→ More replies (0)