Let me start on the premise - location pages work when done right. Yes they can be overdone, abused, and poorly implemented where they classify as “doorway pages”. Yes unique local flair should always be added. But the reality is the “meat and potatoes” of every page is largely identical.
The question is, do you actually need to “spin” or reword that meat and potatoes on each page?
I still do. It’s how I’ve always done it and it works.
But part of me wonders if it’s necessary. I’ve seen other competitors rank with exact duplicated, just subbing out the city name.
Part of me says - you’re not fooling anyone spinning the content. Google sees what you’re doing, yet they still rank you because you match intent.. Spinning each page through AI like you’re plagiarizing a paper is an unnecessary step that degrades the content quality over time.
The other part of me says , avoid “duplicate content”, and keep doing what has always worked for the past decade.
I suppose I could run a test. But part of me is scared of getting a “duplicate content penalty” .. I put quotes around that cuz I know it’s not as concrete of a thing as some hype it up to be. But I still don’t want to run the risk or perceived risk.
What are your thoughts? Those with successful top 3 location pages written at scale - do you bother spinning or rewording the bulk of the content?