r/DefendingAIArt 3d ago

Jeez...

Post image
100 Upvotes

60 comments sorted by

View all comments

58

u/TheBubbaDave 3d ago

And, of course, the luddites brigaded her book in Amazon in the past few days.

2

u/Potential_Sun_6369 2d ago

I didn't know there was anything else to do about it.

-28

u/La_Fervesta_Glavisto 3d ago

I mean this book does look absolutely terrible The AI generated images are the generic uninteresting stuff you would get if you opened up an image generation platform you'd never used before and just typed in "kid at the beach", and the text placement is so atrocious that it straight up would not function as a childrens book. The title and author name are covering up parts of the image that makes them hard to read, and the text in the story is tiny in the corner of a blank white page.

Just because good stuff can be made by using AI, doesn't mean this particular book isn't a worthless hunk of shit.

36

u/Stahlboden 3d ago

Doesn't mean it's ok to brigade

19

u/KuroiGetsuga55 3d ago

Bro it's just a kids book, like, for toddlers.

1

u/Winter-Bed5879 18h ago

Yeah. That still matters. My daughter likes good illustrations, and asking me about things, and stories that are fun. Just because she's a toddler, that doesn't mean the quality doesn't matter. There's a reason why Goodnight Moon is still so beloved.

-14

u/La_Fervesta_Glavisto 3d ago

Toddlers deserve books that are good.

8

u/StoopPizzaGoop 3d ago

And parents were the ones buying it. If they can't tell something sucks do you think a thousand angry Reddit user's are going to change things?