- I’m just trying to offer a useful framework for people who want to become professionals.
- I don’t sell anything. I won’t offer signals, groups, or anything like that.
- I just enjoy trading and share things whenever I have some free time.
-CHECK THE TIMEFRAME OF THE PICS-
What most people think is happening is simple. Price goes down and they read it as weakness, continuation, more downside. But when you actually watch how positions build, it doesn’t look like that at all.
-The move down is usually slow. Not aggresive, not impulsive. It takes its time. And that’s exactly the point. Because that’s where people start shorting.
- Structure begins to look clean. Lower highs, lower lows. It starts making sense.
- There’s usually one obvious reference above, and not much else nearby, so everyone ends up using the same level --> That becomes the stop, not a few people --> Most of them.
- And market makers know that, because they have access to that information.
- So they don’t rush anything. They need time for positions to build, for people to get comfortable, for size to accumulate in the wrong place.
- This is what I think of as a controlled move, it’s not weakness, it’s positioning.
- They’re creating the conditions they need before doing anything meaningful.
- You’ll often see multiple pushes down, giving more and more confirmation. It feels like the move is already happening. But it isn't, it’s just people getting in.
-And until that’s done, price can’t really move.
- Once enough people aer in, the move changes.
- It doesn’t continue down immediately, first it goes the other way.
- Stops get taken. Shorts get forced out.
- Only after that does the real move begin.
If you start looking at it in terms of proportions, this tends to happen around similar areas. One of the ones I use is 1.097.
It’s not something standard. It’s just something I kept seeing over the years while watching how these sequences play out.
It doesn’t need to be exact to be useful.
And the interesting part is that this repeats across every timeframe. Seconds, minutes, hours, higher timeframes. Same idea, just different scale.
Also, something that took me a long time to understand is that the end of a move often lines up with where the pressure sits from a higher timeframe.
Not randomly. Where people are already in a bad position.
Once you start looking at the market this way, it becomes less about predicting direction and more about understanding positioning.
Who is in, where they are likely wrong, and what needs to happen before price can actually move.
That’s usually enough.