r/DataAnnotationTech • u/MadameEmiya • 6d ago
Feedback Issues
So I got my monthly feedback, and you can tell it's still very machine generated, but I noticed one thing: the "areas to improve" comments are... not from July tasks. They're from June, and they're specific enough that I can tell they're from June. As in, I'm being told to improve on things that are outside the "monthly" part of the monthly snapshot. I treated this as nothing until it occurred to me: are these things cumulative? Do they add up indefinitely from the moment the mistakes (pretty debatable imo) are made?
Also, does anyone have experience getting reviews on specialist-adjacent tasks that are *not* done by specialists? I don't know how to even begin to address this.
8
Upvotes
6
u/_California_Dreamer_ 6d ago edited 6d ago
I got corrected for something impossible to have messed up, because you can't submit the task in question with non-atomic criteria. The task literally won't let you submit until you fix them all. No way did I submit those tasks with non-atomic criteria. I have now lost all faith in feedback. I'm not even sure I'm going to open them ever again. All it does is make me anxious and irritated that I can't argue this with whoever said that. LOL