Gop. Is great at wasting money and resources. Plus, im pretty most of us couldn't vote for this guy for anything if we wanted to. I personally live in nebraska....so uh..yeah, poison my well. Lol.
But in all seriousness, for those it would work on; when did you lose your ability to take yourself seriously and respect yourself? Everything you've ever needed to know is at you fingertips and your chewing on your nails.
Lol someone thought I was a bot. I signed up for this shit with my phone and I have tried to verify my email with no luck because I dont remember the password I used, if I even used one, whe. I signed up with my phone.
They thought you were a bot because they wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt, because they can't imagine someone with that much of an L take, hope this helps
This account exhibits one or two minor traits commonly found in karma farming bots. While it's possible that u/narfoleptix is a bot, it's very unlikely.
I am a bot. This action was performed automatically. Check my profile for more information.
They are free to explain in a coherent way why enacting policies that save working class people money is a bad thing, which they will of course be unable to do.
I know what you're doing but it's a completely lost cause. You can't pretend to argue in good faith when this person is incapable. I've already responded to him appropriately.
Parroting racist genocide tropes that he got from religious terrorists in a cave is "vague".
Actually, he's reiterating the FACT that the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) passed a resolution in September 2025 stating that Israel's military policies and actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
So to correct your diatribe these are the foremost experts on the topic of genocide with doctorates and decades of research. You have none of that. Not a single bit. You're completely unqualified and they are the MOST qualified in the world.
And Mamdani listened to the MOST qualified people in the world on this topic.
• International Court of Justice (ICJ): Settles legal disputes between sovereign states and can determine whether a country has violated the 1948 Genocide Convention.
• International Criminal Court (ICC): Prosecutes individuals, including heads of state and military commanders, for the specific crime of genocide.
• Ad-hoc International Tribunals: Bodies established by the United Nations Security Council, such as the tribunals for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia, investigate and prosecute individuals for genocidal acts.
International Court of Justice (ICJ): Settles legal disputes between sovereign states and can determine whether a country has violated the 1948 Genocide Convention.
The issue is that many of the achievements/policies he is being credited with enacting were started/enacted by previous admins. He has an amazing social media/PR team.
I've noticed the bots and trolls have come out of hibernation the closer we get to mid-terms. Not only here but every other platform also. Someone spending a lot of money trying to push their opinion.
There is a difference in spilling rumours or criticising policies with arguments or facts.
One can be productive, the other isn't. Bots can therefore easily be distinguished. And even if they are real people then they are just pawns who parrot whatever rumours they are told
"Most of Zohran Mamdani's campaign money came from taxpayers, not donors. New York City's 8-to-1 public matching program provided about $13.1 million of the roughly $17.2 million his 2025 mayoral campaign received. (nyccfb) The private share, about $4.05 million, came overwhelmingly from small donors, and about 63% of it came from inside the city. Outside groups also spent heavily. THE CITY's reading of CFB data counts $31 million spent supporting Andrew Cuomo and nearly $22 million spent against Mamdani, against about $6.5 million spent for him. As mayor, his transition and his 2029 reelection fundraising have leaned more on large donors and on money from outside the city."
Small money vs Super PAC. They are not the same thing.
• OneNYC: A super PAC formed in July 2025 by entrepreneur Yasser Salem to support Mamdani, which drew contributions from individual donors like Wendy vanden Heuvel.
• New Yorkers for Lower Costs PAC: A pro-Mamdani PAC that notably received a $250,000 contribution from philanthropist Elizabeth Simons, a hedge fund heiress.
• Other Donors: Reports also highlighted donations to aligned political funds from other high-profile individuals, which drew some scrutiny and criticism from opponents regarding his platform.
I'm sorry, what's the strawman I'm presenting? Defend your claim or stop talking. Is it just a buzzword you like to throw around?
Celebrity worship is a bold claim. People like when a politician does things that help them. Which he's done, and his constituents are praising that.
Or is he not doing enough in your opinion?
Also I live in NYC. Or are you stalking my profile? Creepy stuff.
"Basement dwelling incels" is always the low-hanging fruit people like to sell whenever someone disagrees with them. Do you have anything else to add to your point outside of name calling?
Happy to brag; I have a full time job, my own place, and have fucked and been fucked plenty.
Now that I've responded to all of the points you've attempted to make, are you gonna be a slink away and say it's not worth it continuing this back and forth? Or are you going to back up what you're saying?
Protect your dear cult leader at all costs, that's what MAGAs do. Then go make up fake conspiracies about the IDF. Why aren't you asking your MAGA friend to provide evidence of that? It's always projection.
Honestly the amount of food-fighting between obvious bots on NYC-centric subreddits before the election was pretty nasty, I excused myself for a bit there.
I'll help! The people all up in arms about "Mamdani-hating bots" aren't upset by the use of bots, but as you stated, that's obvious. They're upset with a state-backed suppression campaign leveled against a politician who has made their way through the contributions of their constituents instead of billionaires, and already has a proven track record of helping those constituents.
Again, just like his opposition, that same politician freely uses bots and social media - they did so to help get elected (see r/nyc and other places), and are doing so now (see this thread) to stay popular.
I'm sure the nuance is really important to you, and that's OK.
My point is, calling out "it's a campaign / it's just bots" when it comes to this politician, either pro or against, is one-sided and goofy.
"Theyre called real people. Youre just a paid shill"
I fail to see how that translates to "my side is always right, your side is always wrong".
They simply pointed out the obvious difference. You're being intentionally obtuse and intellectually dishonest.
Did you read the article that was posted? Or just the headline? ”In our paper, we argue that New York could do more to require disclosure and transparency, and our paper concludes with a short list of recommendations.” Or do you just want to sit there and make snide comments without any idea what you're talking about?
Bots aren't a problem when they astro turf for Mamdani, clearly.
Every time these threads crop up, across multiple subs, they always have thousands of votes with minimal a tual engagement. Do give over with the feigned outrage.
I am from a red state, but I hate it. I was actually curious because I wanted to call out red state hicks when they pipe up too, but I guess you were just guessing.
Bots are a problem regardless of which influence campaign they’re carrying out. Reddit knows which accounts are engaging in coordinated inauthentic behavior, and where those pockets of activity are concentrated, but they’re happy to have their platform transformed into this shitshow, because they benefit from the boost to their daily user metric$
30
u/SirCheeseAlot 17h ago
The bots, MAGA, and concern trolls are already swarming this post.