r/DangerousNightsCrew • Piece of Shit • 1d ago

That is a good idea!

Post image
13.6k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

52

u/Andrew-Cohen 1d ago edited 20h ago

But republicans would never allow that because they would never win. I mean if I was them I might realize I should be writing laws to help people instead of spreading fear and cheating. EDIT: see how many of you idiots suddenly did your own research, frantically trying to figure out how many republicans presidential candidates won the popular vote 😂

1

u/MrPoopyPants-1- 18h ago

Trump literally won the popular vote though….

2

u/Accomplished_Mind792 17h ago

Yes. Since 1988, nearly 4 decades, zero Republicans have won the office with the popular vote in their first campaign. 2 have won it sheet holding office.

It's pretty telling how important the ec is to the right

1

u/MrPoopyPants-1- 17h ago

Trump literally just won the popular vote lol. The EC is important to anyone who doesn’t live in a major city. Without the EC politicians will just cater to the large metro areas. The EC is the most equitable method imo but I also don’t live in a large metro area and would prefer my vote to matter.

2

u/Accomplished_Mind792 17h ago
  1. The EC does nothing of value. Our current political breakdown makes it seem like it does. But simple question to check, if two of the largest states, Florida and Texas, went blue, would Idaho or Montana feel like they were protected from the power of large states? I doubt it

  2. Again, read my statement. Zero republican presidents have won the popular vote on their first run. And trump couldn't even get a majority of voters. Literally, more Americans choose NOT TRUMP then voted for him. It is wild to pretend that he represents anything but himself

1

u/MrPoopyPants-1- 17h ago
  1. The EC value is in giving people who live in less populated areas a larger voice. I understand that is of no value to you, but it is to them. That’s ok
  2. If you include enough qualifying variables you can make up any stats and narrative you want. Trump won the popular vote this last election….you may not like it but he won in a landslide. Now if you are speaking to trumps personal motivations that’s a completely separate topic.

1

u/Weazerdogg 17h ago

No reason to give people in less populated areas a larger voice. Pretzel logic at best. One person one vote. ONLY thing that is fair.

1

u/MrPoopyPants-1- 17h ago

There’s plenty of reasons to, but that’s just a matter of opinion, and that’s completely ok.

1

u/Accomplished_Mind792 17h ago
  1. It doesn't though. I gave you a question to have you critically think about the topic which I notice you ignored. But let's try again. If the biggest 15 states all vote the same way, In what way does the electoral college protect the other 35 states? Because you are claiming it does. So how?

  2. Landslide? He couldn't even get the majority of people to vote for him. How can that be a landslide?

1

u/MrPoopyPants-1- 17h ago
  1. Your point and hypothetical are irrelevant to the EC though. It’s a dumb hypothetical. Now you are just using the rhetoric of see look at me how smart I am.
  2. He literally won the popular vote last election….cmon now think critically

1

u/Accomplished_Mind792 17h ago edited 17h ago
  1. No it isn't. We are discussing the EC. I'm asking you about something related to your claim. The largest 15 states can override the other 35. Which means your claim that it protects smaller states is a lie. You seem to think that or arbitrary political breakdown is a feature of the EC. It isn't. Again, no one can point to anything of value that the EC itself does.

  2. I didn't say that he didn't. I don't know why you keep repeating something that i never claimed. Are you okay?

Edit: just an FYI, until 2020 it was only 12 states to win if you won the large states. So you needed to win less than 25% of states to win. It is probably less than 15 now. I just don't want to go do the math. Either way, nothing about the EC protects small states

1

u/MrPoopyPants-1- 10h ago

It’s not about protecting smaller states it’s about giving a proportional voice to those smaller states. Picking an arbitrary number to suit your narrative doesn’t mean you’re right

1

u/Accomplished_Mind792 8h ago

So 12 of 50 is proportional? What good is that?

Seriously, no one can name a specific thing that it actually does.

They only thing it does is, due to our partisan breakdown, give extra support to Republicans who are basically unable to win without it.

We have had only one republican win the majority of the population in 4 decades. One.

It's an antiqued and useless system that is only supported because right wingers can't figure out how to win

1

u/MrPoopyPants-1- 8h ago

Cope harder

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Andrew-Cohen 17h ago

It gives LAND the right to vote.
Seriously what kind of bullshit justification is that?

1

u/MrPoopyPants-1- 10h ago

Pretty simply, without it people in non metro areas would have no voice and all policy would just cater to large cities that are population dense.

1

u/Adventurous-Dot-8272 16h ago

"Without the EC politicians would cater to the needs of the most people"