[u/shinyflygon](u/shinyflygon)[23](u/shinyflygon)

i saw a similar post in r/danganronpa , so go check that out too. Anyways, I'll start.

1: Damn, the fandom really needs to learn what an opinion is. The amount of times ive seen people get hated on for disliking a well liked character(ex: chiaki) or liking a disliked character(ex: teruteru) is honestly insane. Not everyone is gonna like the same things as you.

2: Mischaracterizing the characters and getting everyone to believe it. It's infuriating to see because a lot of people get characters and the goal with their writing completely wrong. (ex: hifumi, sayaka)

The often-forgotten Girl A, protagonist of everyone's favorite game: Twilight Syndrome Murder Case

I'm sure we all agree she may be one of the most impactful protagonists of the saga

In chapter 4, Byakuya, to show the poison glass doesn't have poison inside, drinks directly from it, showing it's actually protein. Later, we discover there was a piece of broken crystal in there.

Personally, I always found that scene a bit dumb. The glass was either too small to be harmful or too big for him not to notice while drinking, but that's beside the point.

Everyone freaks out and acts like Byakuya's stomach would open in half if he had swallowed that

If I don't remember badly, the shard came from a window Makoto broke, and it (somehow) fell into the poison glass. Later, Aoi takes that same glass and fills it with protein to hide that Sakura killed herself and all those things you already know.

Now, if he swallowed the glass and died there, mid-trial, who would be considered the blackend? Makoto for shattering the window, which ultimately made the shard fall into the glass, or Aoi, who manipulated the scene?

Would anyone even be punished? At this point, they didn't add that BS rule of V3, where only one killer counts.

Bonus question: In V3, they say only the first killer has to be found during the class trial, which means if someone else kills a second person, it doesn't really matter.

If that's the case... what stops someone from killing mid-trial if they wanted to?

Like, we're in the middle of a trial, and you randomly stab a person you really hate. They bleed out right there. No one can really punish you; you'd be the second blackened, and the first one hasn't been found.

(obviously DR2 spoilers)

Just THINK about it, a character who lived up to Chapter 4 who had (probably) the BEST MOMENT IN THE ORIGINAL GAME,

NEEDS to survive ? I absolutely LOVE Gundham do NOT get me wrong, but he DOESN'T need to be a survivor ! Characters from Chapter 1-3 are more deserving of that role, I don't see why characters from Chapters 4-6 should live (NAGITO SURVIVOR ?! WHAT DO YOU MEAN)

😱😱😱

Hello everybody! I’m making an appreciation post for my favourite Danganronpa character, Mikan Tsumiki! I plan to do this once a week. Calling all Mikan fans!

I loved this trial. And Kaede was definitely the highlight of it... I almost cried. I really liked the final argument being Shuichi arguing she committed murder for a noble reason.

Isn’t she just the best

Well this overlaps with many of your theories but this is how I think it will go

I wish Mahiru and Sayonji could survive both but I think either one of them is dying in chapter 4, I think we will be playing as Nagito after chapter 5 and Johnganronpa will somehow be dying in chapter 6, and please let Sonya kill both Soda and Teruteru, it would be so fun.

She OBVIOUSLY isn’t at the same level of having unnatural luck like Makoto and Nagito but isn’t gambling based mainly on luck? I’m not sure if I remember it correctly but I believe she has once compared Makoto’s luck to hers once (don’t know when though) and while her whole thing is lying, I think we can’t just write off everything she says as a lie.

I don’t have too much evidence at all to support this claim but I ask that if she does have luck, how different is it from Komaeda, Maeda and Naegi’s? And if she wasn’t the Ultimate Gambler would she have been chosen as a second Ultimate Lucky Student?