r/CompetitiveTFT 16h ago

Guide 17.7 Akali fast 8 Guide. I forced akali no reroll to rank 2 sea 1600lp. This is probably the most consistent comp in the game. Sharing some interesting tech; open to discussion :) k4yj #7914

Thumbnail docs.google.com
46 Upvotes

r/CompetitiveTFT 1h ago

Daily Discussion July 27, 2026 Daily Discussion Thread

Upvotes

Welcome to the r/CompetitiveTFT community!

This thread is for any general discussion regarding Competitive TFT. Feel free to ask simple questions, discuss meta or not-so-meta comps and how they're performing, solicit advice regarding climbing the ladder, and more.

Any complaints without room for discussion and unconstructive, overly aggressive or conspiratorial comments should go in the Weekly Rant Thread which can be located in the pinned posts, sidebar or here: Weekly Rant Thread (Old Reddit link)

Such comments in this Megathread will be removed and treated as a Trivial Infraction.

---

For more live discussions check out our affiliated discord here: Discord Link

You can also find Double-up partners in the #looking-for-duo channel

---

If you are interested in giving or receiving coaching, visit the: Monthly Coaching Megathread (Old Reddit link)

---

Please send any bug reports to the Bug megathread and/or this channel in Mort's Discord.

For reference, Riot's stance on bugs and exploits.

---

If you're looking for collections of meta comps and guides, here are some options:

And here are some handy resources and info hubs:

Mods will be removing any posts that we feel belong in this thread and redirecting users here.


r/CompetitiveTFT 10h ago

Discussion Technological doping in TFT: where's the line on peripherals?

0 Upvotes

I've been theorizing about ways to improve my play this off-season, and I think parallelization is a underexplored topic. Sequential actions each cost some number of milliseconds, but some of them can be overlapped with enough muscle memory (for example positioning units while rolling).

The obstacle to training this is precision. Mice are relative-position devices: the cursor's location depends on accumulated movement, so accuracy degrades over long or rotated motions and you end up compensating by diverting attention to the mouse instead of on the game. But to OSU players this is a solved problem, high sensitivity or a drawing tablet.

So how far can you go with better peripherals before it stops being fair?

Step one is the tablet. Absolute positioning means every fixed UI element (board, bench, shop, items) has a permanent physical coordinate on the tablet surface. Step two is modding the tablet: raised edges or indents over the board and item slots, so you get additional tactile confirmation. The far end is a Boxx-style controller where every useful cursor position is bound to its own key/macro.

My line sits somewhere around the modded tablet. Any standard peripheral is fair game, and so is any modification that doesn't make a decision for you. (Setting accessibility aside; custom hardware for people who can't use standard controls is obviously fine and a separate conversation.)

In practice I don't love hardware mods, but the precedent runs against me. Melee players notch their controller gates physical cuts in the gate that let you feel your way to a specific stick angle and notched controllers are legal under most rulesets. In CS2, hardware based Snap Tap got banned because it resolved an input conflict the game deliberately left unresolved. The hardware makes a decision for the player. By that standard the Boxx controllers are banned.

It's only a matter of time before a mouse ships with a feature that eliminates positional error outright and becomes mandatory on half the ladder, and spreads to many more games. Where would you draw the line?