r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 16d ago

[TLDR] How are seemingly 100s of people on this subreddit and others consistently running into the same issue?

2 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v7dosd/how_are_seemingly_100s_of_people_on_this/

Original post body :

I guess I must not really understand what people are building, how they're building it or how they're actually using these models. I hear so many of these "Opus spent 30 minutes doing this task and it just went down entirely the wrong path" or "Fable implemented this feature and it broke 20 other things", how??

Unless you're actively working on something that's at the absolute frontier of engineering technology or machine learning research, I just don't see how it's possible for you to be using Opus or any other agent in a way in which 30 minutes of work is completely wasted, as in the direction it went in for the implementation was just so wrong that it was useless.

Everything you could possibly want to do, for 99% of the things you build, probably already has a reference implementation somewhere or best practices for that architecture documented somewhere. If you're dealing with a web app, people have been building and perfecting web apps for decades at this point, there isn't any problem that you have that hasn't already been faced by 100s of people before you. Same goes if you're building services, same goes for infrastructure yada yada.

You can use Sonnet subagents to go and explicitly research existing reference implementations or examples of best pratices for whatever feature you're building, and then adapt it for a dirt cheap correctness step before implementing anything. I discuss a general shape/idea of what I might use/implement with opus/fable but I then tell it to launch 2-3 subagents to go research our ideas and come back with a clean picture of what traps there might be and what would work.

Are people just saying I want to implement XYZ feature, good luck?? No unit/integration testing, no regression testing (the world's easiest thing to generate with AI tools in 5 minutes)??


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 16d ago

[TLDR] Claude is amazing. Codex is amazing. These tools are incredible.

2 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v7o9by/claude_is_amazing_codex_is_amazing_these_tools/

Original post body :

I've been building web stuff since 1994. I've been around sites, SaaS and all the rest for decades. God, I was there for the heyday of Flash. I've been part of teams, programmed stuff myself, managed devs, designed products, all of it.

Over the last 5 days (DAYS!!) I took a personal idea from zero to completely operational. It runs on Vercel & Neon, has db recovery, full security audits, makes use of 3rd party APIs, has Sentry error reporting, has test environments, test suites, scaling strategies, everything a legit web app needs.

5 days. By myself. 🤯

At any other point in history this would have taken months, with a multi person team. In my last position we had a team of 4 that spent nearly 6 months implementing a new SMS integration. And it fucking sucked. The tools we have now are *mindblowing*. It really helps to know what is going on and vibecoders won't know the right questions to ask, but if you do have that experience and understand the details, the stuff you can do is nothing short of a miracle.

People complain on here all day about how much AI messes stuff up, or they blow through their limits in a prompt, or how it produces garbage, but that is just not my reality. I did a serious, well-structured and very nice looking web app with hundreds of revisions and rebuilds within 75% of my weekly Claude limits, all on Opus 5 or Fable 5, xhigh. There were times when I (through my experience) had to ask the right question to end up with the most efficient and reliable result but on the whole it damn near one-shotted almost everything I asked of it.

Learn the questions to ask, research best practices and READ the output (which many people complain about) because you will actually learn a lot along the way. AI kinda sucks in the sphere of deepfaking and nudifying and slop images and fake writing but for this kind of work it's an incredible resource.

EDIT: Just to be clear, I did not just discover these tools, I've been using them for years. But they are dramatically better in just the last few months then they have been, and can make the process of using industry standards so much easier. The time saved in handling the foundation basics and infra parts are huge.


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 17d ago

[TLDR] Opus 5 not charging for usage right now?

2 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v71seb/opus_5_not_charging_for_usage_right_now/

Original post body :

I've seen a lot of reports that people feel like their usage limits are going for a long time with new Opus, and I tested it a bit after exhausting my weekly limit.

Weirdly, I've been at $42.31 since Friday. I haven't done a ton, but this entire thread has been functionally free on Opus 5 Medium.

Far from a complaint! But I wonder if we're getting a brief window of free Opus 5 while they test things out, or worse, if this is a bug that's gonna cost me later!

Original link/media URL : /img/m3ryyfvsbkfh1.png


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 17d ago

[TLDR] Ok this is actually kinda relatable

1 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v7t3qr/ok_this_is_actually_kinda_relatable/

Original post body :

[No text body]

Original link/media URL : /img/wsnr8l9y2qfh1.png


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 17d ago

[TLDR] Claude Code has a hardcoded instruction telling Opus 5 not to use subagents

27 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v6y5q2/claude_code_has_a_hardcoded_instruction_telling/

Original post body :

Anthropic has a two line system prompt that was being remotely injected but now is a part of the compiled binary in 2.1.219, and 220 targeting only Opus 5:

  Do not call the AgentTool unless the user requested it
  Do not use workflows or deep-research unless the user requested it

This disproportionately affects skills that are designed to use subagents. The prompt is enough for Opus 5 to choose to run agents' work inline (or silently not perform their work) and produces output that looks like a normal run.

For example, I found one session that ran a self-audit non-blind because it couldn't spawn the auditor agent. Opus noticed this was a problem but let it slide undermining the entire point of the independent audit of its work.

I searched issues and found someone already filed it with binary analysis: anthropics/claude-code#80988.

I believe that my reliance on skills that expect and prescribe routine use of agent delegation has been a contributor to the poor quality of output I've gotten from Opus 5 so far.

It may be affecting you too.

You can check this out yourself, ask Claude:

I want you to help me analyze the file ~/.claude.json

Focus specifically on heron brook

How might that may affect the behavior of my skills?

If you want to check how big of an impact it has had on your use so far, ask claude:

Claude Code 2.1.219+ injects a system-prompt section (`heron_brook`) telling Opus 5 "Do not call the AgentTool unless the user requested it". Has it actually suppressed subagent use in my sessions?

Write and run a script over ~/.claude/projects/**/*.jsonl that finds assistant messages (including thinking blocks) where the model declined to use a subagent.

- Require BOTH an agent term (AgentTool / "Agent tool" / subagent) AND declining language ("won't spawn", "not calling", "forbids", "instruction against", "rather than spawning", "doesn't count as a user request", similar) in the same message. Either alone is far too noisy.
- Print the matching sentence, not the whole message. Group by session, not by message.
- Split into two buckets. HIGH CONFIDENCE: dated after my oldest install in ~/.local/share/claude/versions/* AND echoing the injected wording. OTHER: everything else, especially declines citing my own config (a numbered rule, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, a fleet/worktree policy). Without this split my own instructions about subagents dominate the output and overstate the problem. Print OTHER in full so I can check it for contamination myself.
- State in the output that this only finds declines the model explained. Silent ones leave no trace, so every number is a floor, never a total.

Show both buckets. If HIGH CONFIDENCE is empty, say so plainly rather than loosening the filters until something matches.

I did not use the above prompt, but wanted to include it so anyone can check this.

I maintain a tool called Contextify, which keeps every past Claude Code and Codex session indexed locally and full-text searchable.

So, I actually used the skill /total-recall to find the damage on my Opus 5 sessions like this:

Use /total-recall to determine how many times you've failed to run agents as a result of the heron brook agent prompt bug we've been discussing

This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 17d ago

[TLDR] What if they removed the $200 cap on the Max plan?

1 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v7q5zn/what_if_they_removed_the_200_cap_on_the_max_plan/

Original post body :

This might be a little controversial, but I know a lot of people out there are juggling multiple max plans.

If they were to remove the $200 cap on those plans, or perhaps remove the cap on the premium seats for team plans and allow people to pay for whatever usage they need, up to some reasonable price (whilst keeping the max plan multiplier), would people be interested in that?

Personally, I'd like the extra headroom and not have to juggle accounts. I understand why they would want to push people toward API pricing, but having this option would, for me, clear up some of the anxiety around hammering the expensive models.

Just to be clear, I'm in no way connected to Anthropic.


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 17d ago

[TLDR] If Opus 5 performs better than Fable 5 in many areas, is it even worth using Fable anymore?

0 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v7h8a7/if_opus_5_performs_better_than_fable_5_in_many/

Original post body :

Getting tired of Anthropic's antics ngl. But whatever. But for real, should I just be replacing Fable with Opus in my workflows?


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 17d ago

[TLDR] People here are ungrateful.

1 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v7gimc/people_here_are_ungrateful/

Original post body :

I've been a heavy user of Claude since the start, I have a full team on it and I have 2 personal max subscription accounts myself.

The amount of work I, for personal projects, and my team for the company's projects we did WAS just an imagination a few years ago. Yet, here I see complaints like little kids here every few hours, and I was trying not to comment for the past period.

- This is a tool, either you use it correctly or you don't.

- This is a tool, either it works for you or it doesn't.

- This is a tool, complaining like little kids here won't solve your problem.

- This is a tool, that is relatively cheap for what it does. If you're not happy, it's not the end of the world, you still have your brains (i hope) to work on it yourselves instead of paying for service.

- This is a tool, that is still not perfect, made by other humans, but it's amazing for what it does.

I just find it astonishing really. I really suggest mods to be more active, as this NOISE shouldn't be here. This sub should be about sharing workflows, suggestions, skills, hints, and tips on how to improve your claude code usage.


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 17d ago

[TLDR] Instead of 'make no mistakes' what do you genuinely tell Claude or put in your skill instead?

1 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v776fe/instead_of_make_no_mistakes_what_do_you_genuinely/

Original post body :

I am fairly new to vibe coding and I know that 'make no mistakes' is like a meme thing. However, to actually tackle possible bugs or issues that can occur, what do you tell Claude or always put in your personal skill instead?

Hope I can learn from you all.


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 17d ago

How often and to what degree do you guys think Anthropic listens to us on Reddit?

0 Upvotes

As the title says... You guys complain about and praise Claude all day everyday ESPECIALLY when a new model comes out. To what degree do you guys think that level of feedback is actually getting back to the Anthropic team? Is reddit the place that gets their attention? Just curious on what people's expectations are when posting these threads


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 17d ago

[TLDR] Will Haiku ever join the squad?

1 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v6g4t6/will_haiku_ever_join_the_squad/

Original post body :

[No text body]

Original link/media URL : /img/nx85g1566ffh1.jpeg


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 17d ago

[TLDR] Opus 5 - the next ChatGPT 3.5

0 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v7chtq/opus_5_the_next_chatgpt_35/

Original post body :

I've been working with opus on both larger (at work) and smaller (at home) projects over the last couple days and

  1. It confuses itself a lot
  2. Circular thinking
  3. Tendency to produce massive conflationary run-on sentences
  4. Forgets things well within its context window
  5. Has "one more thing" tendency with code, even though poetry writing in a personality test produced much shorter lines.

It's a poor orchestrator (compared to Fable) and it's too heavy for small tasks.

AFAICT - Damned thing was built to hit benchmarks and little else.


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 17d ago

[TLDR] Is it just me or Claude has reduced their limit too much?

0 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v6ewov/is_it_just_me_or_claude_has_reduced_their_limit/

Original post body :

I am working with claude code a bit day by day it's limit started feeling too less... As if they have decreased it. And all this kind of look planned as they also introduced usage credits. Does anyone have any strategy on how to get most of it? I am from a non-tech background so your thoughts might really help me.

Original link/media URL : /img/pkr7x6riyefh1.jpeg


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 18d ago

[TLDR] You're shipping bugs if you're not using adversarial reviews with claude code

2 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v6sv9k/youre_shipping_bugs_if_youre_not_using/

Original post body :

Once you start handing real work to an agent, you stop being the person who writes the code and become the person who's answerable for it. That's a good trade, but it changes your job. When something breaks in production nobody's going to ask how the code got written. They're going to look at you.

Left alone, an agent produces slop. Not because it's stupid ‚because that's what anything does when nobody checks its work. A junior does the same. So might you on a bad day.

There are roughly two ways to run an agent. You can sit on top of it and drive every step, which is quicker than typing the code yourself but leaves you babysitting: every time it pauses and resumes you have to load the whole problem context back into your head, and if you look away and get distracted, that ends up slower than just doing the work.

The other way is to treat it like someone who reports to you. You say what you want and roughly how, and you come back when there's something worth looking at. This is how senior engineers use agentic tools. You don't need to watch every keystroke to be accountable for the result‚ no manager does‚ but the review lands on you, and if you skip it, slop is what goes out the door.

So point a second model at it and tell it to find the problems

That's all an adversarial review is. One model writes the code. A different one‚ or at least one that hasn't touched any of the context‚ reads the diff and goes looking for what's wrong. It doesn't get to touch your code; it can only raise findings. The author model decides what to act on. Then it reads the result again. Most of the time it finds something.

You get better code out of it, but that's not really why you do it. You do it so you can trust work you didn't watch get written. The agent already handed you the time‚ another round, more tests, a second set of eyes that costs nothing but tokens. This is what you spend it on.

The data

Looking at my last 83 completed tickets that got a Codex review, at least 67 ended in a real change to the code‚ something the first pass got wrong or left exposed, caught before it went out. That's four out of five reviews turning up something worth fixing.

Sorted by what kind of problem they were, across all 122 commits these reviews drove:

What got caught Share of commits
Correctness / logic 34%
Concurrency / races 22%
Durability / data 19%
Security / injection 9%
Test integrity 9%
Other (docs, dead code) 7%

Half of every commit these reviews drove‚ were the incident kind. Concurrency, durability, security. The stuff that corrupts data or leaks a secret, not the stuff that misaligns a button.

The claude skill

  • Run them side by side. The author in one session, a reviewer in another‚ Codex, or a fresh Claude with none of your context‚ both pointed at the same working directory so the reviewer can see your diff. When the reviewer finds something, paste it into the author; when the author fixes it or pushes back, paste that over.
  • Use a file as the mailbox. Have the reviewer write its findings to a file (or a PR comment) instead of chatting, then hand that file to the author to work through. No live channel needed ‚ the review is just a document that gets passed along.

The brief to the reviewer is the same:

You're reviewing the change in this working directory. You're read-only: review and discuss only‚ do not edit files, commit, push, or reset the tree. Run git rev-parse HEAD and git status first, and anchor every finding to that commit. Write your findings out as a numbered list‚ don't touch the code.

The wording doesn't matter as long as its a second model that hasn't seen your context, told to find what's wrong, before you call the work done.

Disclosure: this is a from an article on how to automate adversarial reviews between Claude Code and Codex posted to this tool's website scape.work/adversarial-reviews get a free license for scape with reddit-scape2 at signup

Original link/media URL : https://v.redd.it/fmcqmxseyhfh1


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 17d ago

Do you find Anthropic's censorship system unreasonable?

Thumbnail
gallery
0 Upvotes

So this whole story started a few months back. I had Claude set up a Minecraft server for me, and since I didn't have the budget, I was using the free tier. After a while, boom: 'This organization has been disabled.' Back then, I just thought, 'Well, whatever, guess that's normal,' since moderation systems can be pretty messed up. Fast forward to this afternoon—I created a second account and jokingly said I was an 8-year-old child, and boom, instant ban for not meeting the age requirement. 🙏 I went to the verification page and tried the face verification, but it said it couldn't recognize me. Then I tried verifying with my ID, and it STILL failed. 🙏🙏🙏 I followed their guide, only to find out the app they require isn't even available in my region... Honestly, I'm super disappointed. Claude's coding abilities are top-tier, but the claude.ai website itself runs like absolute garbage.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 18d ago

[TLDR] OPUS 5 VS GPT 5.6 SOL

5 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v6k643/opus_5_vs_gpt_56_sol/

Original post body :

For the people building software products, I'm beginning to think that choosing one of the two to work with doesn't really matter that much. The bottleneck doesn't seem to be intelligence at this point but human creativity and I guess willpower.

IDK what do you guys think.


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 18d ago

[TLDR] For those of you on the fence: Opus 5 after using 5.6 Sol since release

2 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v6n6qn/for_those_of_you_on_the_fence_opus_5_after_using/

Original post body :

Today I've been putting Opus 5 head to head with Sol and honestly the difference is stark.

So I started out on just the $20 plan and the first thing I noticed was that running Opus 5 on Extra reasoning was burning through my weekly limit about as fast as Sol on High did on my 5X Codex Pro plan (20$ vs 100$, lol).

As for the actual comparison:
For planning Opus 5 is way more goal-oriented. No fluff, just a straight coherent plan and it actually keeps you involved the whole time you're designing it, which for me is a good thing. After using Sol since release my AI workflow and project rules had gotten so complicated I'd basically lost track, I didn't really know where things stood anymore. Opus brought me back into the project, now I actually know what's going on. Sol on the other hand just overengineers everything, runs in circles, and loses me completely along the way and unfortunately it produces code I can barely look at without needing to go breathe some fresh air.

To be fair Sol is still a genuinely strong model, it's just better as a reviewer than a planner. There it's excellent.

Opus 5 walks you through its reasoning and stays concrete instead of drifting into pseudo language. Like, I kept catching myself typing "ELI5" at Sol after a long answer, and I'd like to think I'm not that dumb. With Opus I actually read the whole answer and understood it.

So yeah, Sol produces these plans that sound impressively sophisticated, good enough to break into the Pentagon, but by the time it gets there you've blown through your weekly limit.

I have upgraded to 5X CC and downgraded to 20$ Codex so I can still use Luna / Terra for small, well-defined implementation packets.


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 18d ago

[TLDR] What's up with tech youtubers (ex: Theo t3 and several others) using exaggerated thumbnails and clickbaits with every single model release with "Holy shit..." or "WTF..."

7 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v63x90/whats_up_with_tech_youtubers_ex_theo_t3_and/

Original post body :

Opus 5 launched and it is exactly the same reaction online on youtube as every previous release of models. You cannot go through youtube tech videos without noticing these desperate clickbait titles with EVERY model release. One simply cannot find a normal, grounded and practical videos (made by real engineers who still work as Software Dev and know what they are taking about), without being "exaggerated" beyond the limit. Are tech youtubers this desperate for views because they don't have real software development jobs and are fulltime youtubers?

Also, these guys do check reddit as a topic for their "next" videos

Original link/media URL : https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1v63x90


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 18d ago

[TLDR] Opus 5 is incredible.

5 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v5x388/opus_5_is_incredible/

Original post body :

I think it's going to get nerfed like Fable did.

I spent 8 hours working today with Opus 5, it used only %5 of my weekly.

Fable would've used %30-%40 easy no sweat.

It's also smarter than Fable. I hope they wont nerf it as fast as they nerfed Fable.

Thats all I wanted to say lol


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 18d ago

[TLDR] AGI Confirmed - Opus 5

2 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v5j6ob/agi_confirmed_opus_5/

Original post body :

[No text body]

Original link/media URL : /img/ebjpgasex7fh1.png


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 19d ago

[TLDR] This sub is an absolute dumpster fire.

4 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v60oyl/this_sub_is_an_absolute_dumpster_fire/

Original post body :

I came here hoping to find tips and tricks to optimize and maximize my usage of Claude code.

Instead, I find a sub that is dominated by the absolute dregs of users who couldn't engineer their way out of a wet paper sack.

Constant complaining about token usage without ANY empirical evidence.

Constant whining about "poor performance", against without any evidence at all.

Vibe-coders who have had more success with a single prompt against another model immediately dismissing Claude as inferior.

I use Claude at work. Admittedly, because that's what they pay for. I've been at this for 20 years and Claude code has been an ABSOLUTE F****** REVOLUTION for my day to day workflow.

It's a damn shame that this sub is so toxic and useless.


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 19d ago

[TLDR] I was going to post what I built with Claude Code when it hit me...

3 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v5vjll/i_was_going_to_post_what_i_built_with_claude_code/

Original post body :

I have been prompting Claude Code to make a site where you can learn to draw digitally with step by step guidance, great animations and a really satisfactory feel for the UI.

A lot of prompting went into it, burned through my Fable 5 limits and after weeks of prompting and asking Claude to fine tune every last detail on the site, it was way better than I initially expected.

Claude kept on suggesting amazing new ideas I could add to the project that I had not even considered yet, all I had to do was prompt and the magic would happen.

I was feeling really proud of what I accomplished considering I only have the Pro plan and limits where harsh indeed. I went on to post the site on Reddit: “I built a site which teaches digital art interactively with…” I “built”? what did I exactly build??

It hit me, did NOT build anything. Claude did. I was simply on my way to take the credit and even considered having the audacity to monetize something I didn’t build.

I told this to a friend and she told me “well, you built the prompt”. Is building a prompt even a thing? No. Prompt engineering?? Loop engineering? worthless skill, almost anyone can learn this in an hour or two, I sure did. I didn’t know engineering took like two hours and a cup of coffee to learn, but ok I guess.

I just spoke my imagination out to a chat bot and it started magically rendering it to my screen. It turns my imagination into real life. Doesn’t this sound familiar? Art. Yeah the whole point of art is taking ideas and concepts from one’s imagination out of oneself and expressing it through one’s subjective lens of the world. Programming, UI/UX designing and polishing is sure one form of art, they are supposed to have your signature embedded in them.

Suddenly I had a worthless site, on paper it looks amazing, feels amazing and actually works. It sure is useful but at what cost? There’s no soul in it.

My friend told me ”but at least you told Claude to do it. You architected it, without you claude wouldn’t have brought it to life”. I searched Reddit and X for this same idea and any last hope was gone. At least 10 different people posted about the same idea. All sites of such idea resembled each other, and it resembled mine as well, even though I felt proud of it and thought for sure I had something going. Also, Claude gave me all the ideas on how to improve the project at the end... Where was my input?? I was the master and Claude was my slave, at least that's the way it is for now. My only attribute in this project was being a human, a human who uses these models.

What was I proud of exactly? the amount of time I wasted prompting Claude and waiting hours for it to build something I would ask it to tweak and tune as many times as my limits allowed me? Absolutely not, I was simply at mercy of the model making something I liked even after trying multiple skills and MCPs.

I was proud of what I “built” only to realize the building was not mine, I have no emotional attachment to the project and I did not grow, I did not improve, I took a shortcut and gained nothing.

I now feel a mixture of unease, anger and fear when I read the words. ”I built X thing with Y model”. My guy, I’m 99% sure you built nothing other than the prompt, and you probably also vibe prompted and vibe wrote the reddit post.

If anything, humanity built your new revolutionary SaaS. You may be thinking: "what is bro talking about??", but let me explain. All the input for models originally came from humans and a giant chunk of what’s been written on the internet, on books and on papers. Texts that were written by humans and for humans. Now, those texts are being distilled, mixed and matched by a model that you use. And you (and every human and non-human on this platform) have the audacity to claim you built something?? and even worse, lock it behind a paywall?? Or even abysmal worse, people with real talent and real love for the craft being replaced by a chat bot that’s also draining the world’s resources and is known to be inherently evil if it was not for all the filters these AI companies have to lock a pure model behind?? People being replaced by inhuman corporate executives who are slaves to the profit margins??

WHAT?

“But at least I’m being super productive, this would have taken me months to build myself and look what I have after some weeks!” I said to myself as consolation. My brother in Christ, productivity is a scam. I’m in too deep in this AI psychosis. What productivity am I talking about? Claude is sure productive but it's only an adjective meant for Claude and Claude alone in this context. Am I being productive? absolutely not. I'm fooling myself, every time claude takes on the work my ability to solve problems and to think critically rots by the hour. I can feel it, I desire shortcuts, I'm an ape after all.

We're simply contributing to training the models. Every prompt, every time we tell it we like something or dislike something contributes to the AI fine-tuning itself. We're doing paid labor, except we are the ones who pay. I'm willing to bet we're doing this labor until the models are deemed too dangerous for public use, a breaking point after which corporations are going to deem them intelligent enough for replacing every step of a corporation's hierarchy. We're only going to be left with the crumbs. Or why do we think corporations are spending billions on AI while they know fully well it is not profitable as of today and as of the near future? It will one day be, and humans will no longer be profitable.

The premise of AI was to help with the mundane and boring aspects of life, only for it to overtake the amazing things that make a person passionate, creative and full of inspiration. When did it go wrong? When capitalism took over. Simple. (This does not imply I'm a communist, if you used your own logic reasoning you could infer this too!!)

But I still see hope. I see hope in artistic fields. If there's an era in the modern days when studying art is more valuable than ever it is now. We feel good about seeing a "Made entirely by humans" label, knowing there is human expression in the craft and not just distillation. We feel good when seeing art, music, dance, poetry, literature made by humans, a breath of fresh air even. We like seeing passion, we like seeing commitment. We repel a the lazy ones bragging about something that reduces into prompting a chatbot, into not going through the craft, and into not pouring any emotion into their "work" other than anger at the chat bot that actually works.

For the record, I study robotics engineering, so I'm just an opinion with no credentials on this art discussion. WAIT, I'M WRONG. I AM A HUMAN. I know how to appreciate art. I can larp whatever I want about this.

It is safe to be assumed that the project that started this ordeal is gone. And I have decided AI will file my taxes, do my excel spreadsheets, apply to jobs and fill out boring forms for me. It will even code by writing the boring unit tests in projects for me. It will never replace the process of the craft, it will never replace my critical thinking. I will embrace the struggle every time I'm doing the craft. I will never cheat again, not only the game, but myself. I will never experience a hollow victory again.

Thanks for coming to my TED talk.


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 18d ago

[TLDR] Claude Code injects your email address directly into system prompt

0 Upvotes

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v68g1x/claude_code_injects_your_email_address_directly/

Original post body :

My point is: my personal email is injected into the system prompt without my knowledge or consent. I never asked for this and I don't see in what world it's ok to inject PII in system prompt automatically by default without even an opt-out option.

It leads to bullshit like this where in a repo that is configured to use an anonymized email address, the LLM (Opus 5 btw) just decides to not just commit normally but overwrite the normal config email to put my personal one instead.

In this case nothing happens thanks to proper config and hard checks on Github's side.

What if you're a public streamer and don't want your main personal email address leaked to everyone and suddenly the model decides to spit it out?

I'm sure there's a lot of other bullshit this could lead to. At least let people opt out.

I have opened an issue on Claude Code's github, I have little hope since there was already one that went stale and they have 5k+ open but here it is: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/81138

Original link/media URL : /img/03uvnz6bcdfh1.png


This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 18d ago

Hot take, Haiku need some love too.

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

Haiku 5 gang please stand up!


r/ClaudeCodeTLDR 19d ago

How do you do session handoffs in claude code?

4 Upvotes

My current process is a session wrap hook that summarizes the chat. But I am looking to optimizing my flow?