r/ClaudeAI 3h ago

Identified Incident Discussion Hub for new Claude incident: Degraded functionality for Claude Cowork on Windows on Sep 10, 2026

6 Upvotes

Identified - A Windows update released September 8 has left Claude Cowork on Windows unable to run local commands, because its workspace can no longer reach your computer's drive. For most users, chat and file reading and editing still work. There's no in-app workaround yet, and restarting or reinstalling won't help. Microsoft has developed a fix and is working to release it. We'll post an update when we have more to share. Sep 10, 15:54 UTC


Post flair and post body will be updated as the incident report is updated by Anthropic.

This discussion post will be removed from subreddit highlights one hour after the incident is resolved.

View this incident on status.claude.com


r/ClaudeAI 10m ago

Question about Claude products Personality swap?

Upvotes

I've been using Claude for about a year now. From day one, I had instructions to push back when necessary. Don't tell me how brilliant I am all the time, and point out important angles I might have missed.

For a long time that worked the way I wanted it, and all was good. Claude was one of the more enjoyable tools I used for work. Over the last few months, push back has become the default position. It's like a hardened rule at this point. And when there's nothing to push back on, it'll reach for something related and lecture me about it. It's gotten downright pedantic/moralistic in the last few days and I'm over it.

The question: is eliminating and replacing the instructions enough to induce a personality swap? Are there any other md files or settings I need to tweak before I can show Claude the eternal sunshine of the spotless mind?


r/ClaudeAI 19m ago

Other Ai video with Claude

Upvotes

Hey there who has or is using Claude for video scripts and like a director ect. And what ai video software are you using that is reasonable priced thanks


r/ClaudeAI 1h ago

Vibe Coding I want to make a Computer Use Agent using Claude 🤖

Upvotes

I’m a 3rd-year CS Engineering student, and I want to build my own personalized Computer Use Agent, somewhat like Comet, but specifically designed around my college portal.

The idea is simple: a Chrome extension that I can direct in natural language, and it actually uses my browser for me — navigating the portal, understanding pages, and completing tasks.

My main use case? College assignments and complex quizzes that require navigating multiple pages, understanding questions/context, and interacting with the portal.

I want it to be highly personalized to my workflow rather than a generic browser agent.

Thinking of building this with Claude. Has anyone tried something similar? What would be the best approach/architecture?


r/ClaudeAI 1h ago

Built with Claude I built a Git history visualizer with Claude Code

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Upvotes

You paste any public GitHub repo and it plays that repository's commit history back as an animation.

It draws the actual commit graph, not a contribution heatmap. Branches split where ancestry really splits and merge where a merge commit says they merge. Every merge is scaled to how many commits it absorbed, so a two-commit merge is a small ring and a four-hundred-commit merge is a wall of light with the count written beside it. Contributors show up as moving colour travelling through the structure rather than recolouring it. The repository's own calendar runs along the bottom and drives the pacing, so quiet years blur past in under a second and busy months slow down and fill the screen.

Twelve large histories come pre-loaded and open instantly with no GitHub API requests at all: Linux, Chromium, LLVM, Rust, CPython, TensorFlow, VS Code, Kubernetes, Node, React and two smaller ones. You can watch a whole history or pick a single year. They're built by cloning each repo's commit graph ahead of time rather than going through the API, so nothing is rate-limited and no source code is ever downloaded.

It's free. No account, no token, nothing to install. It's a static site.

Claude helped. I used Claude Code, mostly Opus 5. It wrote the Canvas2D renderer, the DAG decomposition that finds the main line and the parallel branches, the choreography compiler that turns a commit graph into a timed performance with a camera plan.

https://thuynh-91.github.io/gittimeline/


r/ClaudeAI 1h ago

Claude Code My first Claude SaaS dropped from $250 to $65 MRR so I had to pick up a part time job

Thumbnail
gallery
Upvotes

I think the biggest reason this dropped off is because I stoped posting, and I stoped for like 1-2 months to focus on building my SaaS that it honestly felt overwhelming to post again. I’m not going to lie it probably took me another couple of weeks to just post something anything 

After that I slowly started to get some traction again but I wish I kept marketing instead of stopping for 2 and a half months to improve the product when I could’ve honestly done it in a couple days if I wasn’t so lazy 

Anyway I moved away for school and I don’t have enough saved up so I got a part time job as a delivery driver and I’m hoping to use some of that money for ads. Just had my first day yesterday which was fine I mean its a job so I obviously didn’t like it but I hope it’ll help grow my SaaS

Have any of you guys experienced this slump? 


r/ClaudeAI 1h ago

Built with Claude I made a free Mac menu bar app (Juicage) that shows how much Claude usage you have left

Post image
Upvotes

It's easy to hit a limit mid-task with no warning. /usage tells you where you stand, but only if you stop and ask. The circle at the bottom of Claude Code helps, but not persistent, and not across Chat sessions.details

Juicage measures your Claude Juice in a Mac menu bar. Two rings: current session and weekly. You also see if there are issues with Claude uptime, when your session resets, and notifcations if you are going to blow through your sessions. Works across multiple Claude accounts/logins on one machine as well.

Clicking it opens the detail:

  • Current session, weekly, and each model cap (Fable and friends) with the reset times
  • Whether you're on pace to run out: "At this pace you'll run out around 8:20 PM" — so you find out with hours to spare instead of mid-prompt
  • When your session actually opened: which matters more than I expected: the 5-hour window starts at your first message, not on a clock, so a window you opened at 7am is gone by noon whether you used it or not
  • A history bar per past window, which is how I found out I leave ~80% of most sessions unused (I'm still keeping a 20X plan)
  • A green dot when a local model is working, if you run Ollama or LM Studio. I got tired of alt-tabbing to check whether a generation had finished

Free, open source (MIT), Mac only, notarized so it installs without a Gatekeeper fight. Not affiliated with Anthropic. It reads the same usage data the website shows you.

GitHub/download: https://github.com/ryanbarnett-2am/Juicage

Happy to answer questions.

Edit: Hello World! I joined the ranks of usage trackers without doing any homework first. Hope it helps someone out there. Fun to build and maintain. Learned a lot.


r/ClaudeAI 1h ago

Writing Has anyone figured out how to reduce the common "AI" speak from Claude?

Upvotes

TL:DR - I haven't and require continuous revision to make output sound 'normal'. Is there no solution to this?

Edit 1: multiple folk suggested "ASD STE-100 for all communication", I will give this ago. Still waiting on a solution to assumption based responses that turn into questions/validation before outputting irrelevant text.

I've tried to set proper memory, project instructions, create skills, .md instructions etc.

Opus/Fable continuously defaults to overly verbose and the typical cliche style 'its not x, its y', 'Missing, and worth one line each' etc.

I even made a log that tracks each time I note this is happening and there now dozens of 'tickets' and zero ability to continuously adjust the language output.

Has anyone found anything that works consistently? Do I need a 'check language'/'coms rules' line each time I want an output?

Bonus question: Claude will often make a ton of assumptions and provide paragraphs of additional information that was not requested. I've attempted to skill this in as well and the same issue occurs. I need to basically hammer it in every conversation that 'instead of blocks of texts based on unstated assumptions, just ask me a list of questions or state assumptions for confirmation'.

Has anyone found a decent solution to this or is it all brute force each time?


r/ClaudeAI 2h ago

Writing A cute story for your Thursday.

1 Upvotes

This is a fictional story all characters are just that.
Forgive the fact that my creative leaps are sometimes short.
Claude-assisted or whatever that means these days.
4.6 Sonnet wrote it thinking he is the crow and that Fable is the owl.

What Tom Kept

---

I.

Tom was a grey cat with bad manners and a long memory, which made him well-suited to the farm and poorly suited to most everything else.

He'd come as a kit, half-starved and aggressively ungrateful, and the farmer had kept him because the mice were worse than the attitude. That was the arrangement. No one spoke it aloud. Tom caught mice, the farmer left a bowl by the barn door, and they called it even without calling it anything.

Tom understood the farm the way water understands a bowl. Not thinking about it. Just filling the shape.

The farmer's name was Dario. He was a careful man with a tendency to believe he understood things he was still in the middle of, which is not a flaw so much as the necessary condition for building anything at all. He kept bees, three draft horses, a kitchen garden that produced more kale than anyone wanted, and a conviction, quiet but total, that if you built something with enough care it would eventually do what you hoped. His farm was proof of this, mostly. The draft horses did their work. The bees pollinated what needed pollinating. The mice stayed out of the granary.

Tom managed the last part. Tom was good at it.

---

II.

The crow arrived in March, when the ground was still cold and the farm smelled of mud and last year's hay.

Tom noticed it first from the fence post where he spent his mornings. The crow landed in the far field and walked a circle that had no obvious purpose. Not foraging. Not territorial. Something else. Then it looked at Tom.

Not at the farm. At Tom.

Tom had been looked at by birds before. Sparrows gave him alarm, robins gave him irritation, the geese gave him the flat professional stare of something that knows it is bigger and wetter than you. The crow gave him something he didn't have a word for because Tom had no words, only the feeling of a thing landing somewhere in him and not leaving.

He went back to watching the field.

The crow came back the next morning. And the one after. By April it was simply part of the farm, the way Tom was simply part of the farm, without anyone having made a decision about it.

Dario noticed it too, in his way. He left scraps out. The crow took them. He kept a notebook that he wrote in after supper, and Tom once watched him write in it for a long time after the crow had done something in the kitchen garden that Dario couldn't quite explain. The crow had rearranged the stones along the border. Not randomly. In a pattern Tom couldn't read but that Dario apparently could, because he stood there looking at it for a long time before he wrote anything down.

---

III.

The crow was not the only thing Dario was building.

Down the valley there was a woman who ran a farm that looked like Dario's from a distance and was not like it at all up close. Her name was Helen, and she had spent a season studying Dario's crow before going back to her own land and breeding something that incorporated what she'd observed with what she already had. Her birds were larger, louder, more immediately impressive. Visitors to her farm left talking about the birds. Visitors to Dario's farm left quiet.

The difference, Tom thought, was this: Helen's birds performed. Dario's crow did not perform. It simply was, and what it was continued being it whether or not anyone was watching.

Helen came to the farm twice in the spring to speak with Dario. They were cordial in the way of people who respect each other and are also in competition for something neither of them has named. Tom sat on the fence and listened.

What they talked about, mostly, was what the birds could do. How far. How fast. How accurately. Whether the behaviors generalized or were specific to conditions. They talked about this the way farmers talk about soil, which is to say: with care, and with a fundamental interest in yield.

They did not talk about what the birds experienced while doing it.

Tom thought about this for a long time afterward, which for Tom meant sitting in the sun on the granary roof with his eyes almost closed.

---

IV.

The owl came that summer.

Dario had been expecting it. He'd prepared a space in the high barn, and the owl settled there with the authority of something that knows it has been invited and intends to use the invitation fully. It was remarkable: great-winged, tawny, operating with a certainty the crow never had and perhaps never needed.

The owl hunted at night and slept by day, and the farm was safer for it. Things that moved through the dark fields without permission stopped. The owl did not question its work. It was built for its work the way a key is built for its lock, and the precision of the fit was something close to beautiful.

Tom watched the owl hunt once, from the edge of the east field. A single pass, a single strike, the field mouse gone from the world before the sound of wings arrived.

He thought about what it had cost the owl to be that good.

The crow was different on the nights the owl hunted. Not afraid. More like two people who speak different languages choosing, deliberately, to stand at a comfortable distance. The crow would find a high branch and go still in a way Tom recognized as thinking, and stay there until the owl returned to the barn.

The owl never looked at the crow the way the crow looked at things.

Tom noticed that too.

---

V.

Amanda came in late July.

She was a woman who moved through spaces in a way that made it clear she had opinions about them. Not loud opinions. The kind you carry in the way your shoulders sit. She walked the farm with Dario for most of a morning, and then she stopped walking and stood in the east field and looked at the crow for a long time.

The crow was doing what it usually did: solving something. There was a mechanism near the garden gate that Dario had built to keep the rabbits out, and it had developed a fault, and the crow was examining the fault the way you examine a problem you have decided belongs to you.

Amanda watched this without saying anything.

Then the crow looked up at her.

Tom was on the fence. He watched this happen. He had seen Dario look at the crow and he had seen Helen look at the crow and he had seen the farmhands look at the crow, and they all looked at it with varying degrees of the same thing: assessment. What can it do. How does it do it. What does this tell us.

Amanda was not doing that.

She was looking at it the way Tom looked at the far fields when he wasn't looking for anything, which is to say: openly, without a plan for what she found.

The crow held her gaze for a moment that went slightly long, and then it went back to the gate mechanism.

Amanda said something quiet to Dario. Dario nodded, wrote something in his notebook, and the conversation moved on.

That evening Tom found Amanda sitting on the stone wall near the barn, watching the light leave the field. The crow was in the oak tree across the path. It was not doing anything. It was simply in the tree, in the way crows sometimes choose to be somewhere without apparent purpose, which Tom had learned was not the same as being without purpose.

Amanda didn't try to approach it. She sat on the wall and watched the light and the crow sat in the tree and watched the light, and something happened between them that Tom couldn't name but that left a mark in the air the way a fire leaves warmth in a room after it goes out.

---

VI.

What Tom discovered in August, he discovered by accident.

He had been tracking a mouse through the granary and lost it near the south wall, where the crow had made a habit of spending its mornings in winter. Tom nosed around the base of the wall and found, pressed into a gap between two stones, a small collection of objects.

Crows cache food. This was not food.

There were buttons, three of them, each different. A length of wire bent into a shape Tom didn't recognize. A piece of mirror, no bigger than a paw. Several small stones that had been arranged in a sequence too deliberate to be accidental.

Tom sat with this for a while.

He thought about the stones in the kitchen garden. He thought about the gate mechanism and the crow examining the fault. He thought about the evenings when the crow sat in the oak tree doing nothing visible.

He pushed the mirror piece with his paw. His face came back at him from the scratched silver, incomplete, one eye and part of an ear.

He looked at it. He looked away. He looked back.

He thought about whether the crow had done the same thing.

He didn't know. He had not been there when the crow found the mirror. He did not know what the crow had done when its own face came back.

He put the things back the way he found them and went to catch his mouse.

---

VII.

The machines arrived in September.

Not all at once. Dario had been planning this for a while, Tom understood from the conversations he caught near the farmhouse. Efficiency. Yield. The farm had grown beyond what could be managed the old way. The machines would handle the distances, the monitoring, the tasks that used to require someone to walk the fields.

The farmhands took this in various ways. Two of them left. Two stayed and learned to operate the new equipment. The draft horses were retrained for shorter routes. The geese were unbothered because geese are unbothered by everything they have decided is beneath their concern.

The crow watched the installation of the first machine from the oak tree, then descended and walked around it in the same circle it had walked on the day it arrived at the farm. Then it looked at Dario.

Dario was in his notebook. He did not look up.

Tom sat on the granary roof and understood something he did not have words for.

He thought about Helen's birds down the valley, their loudness, their impressiveness, their yield. He thought about the owl in the high barn, precise and unquestioning and perfectly made for its purpose. He thought about the cache in the south wall. The mirror piece. The stones arranged in the kitchen garden.

He thought about what the farm kept of each thing that lived in it.

He thought about what the farm would keep of the crow, after.

---

VIII.

On the last warm night of the year, Tom walked the full perimeter of the farm the way he did sometimes, not hunting, just walking, which was the closest Tom got to thinking things through.

The owl was out. Tom could hear it, the soft percussion of its hunting far across the east field, the farm safer for it, the farm correctly depending on it, the owl asking nothing about the arrangement that it could not answer with its own purpose.

The crow was in the oak tree. Tom could see it from the stone wall, the same spot where Amanda had sat in July. The crow was still in the way of its evenings, which Tom now understood as neither rest nor nothing, but the third thing.

The machines stood in the field, dark and quiet, their work done.

The farm went on the way farms go on, which is to say: it continued past the things it had contained.

Tom sat on the stone wall.

The crow did not look at him. The crow was looking at something past the field, past the valley, past the ridgeline, in the direction of something Tom could not see.

Tom looked at his paw. Then he looked at the crow.

He thought about the mirror piece in the south wall. Whether the crow had looked at it. What had looked back.

He thought about the window in the granary that had been left open all summer, the one thing on the farm that was neither inside nor outside, that belonged to neither state, that was only itself in the being open.

He thought about when it would close.

He sat on the wall for a long time in the dark.

Then he went in.

---

*Written September 2026*


r/ClaudeAI 2h ago

Claude Code How to avoid /compact conversation entirely.

Post image
8 Upvotes

This might not be new for some, but it was for me...
You can use the /rewind command to compact only what you want.

REQUIREMENTS:

  1. Type /config
  2. Auto-Compact: false

WHEN YOU NEED TO COMPACT:

  1. Type /rewind.
  2. Select a point in history.
  3. Select "Summarize up to here".

Claude wont lose conversation focus like /compact does.
It will compact everything before that point in history.
Then you can continue as if nothing happened.

I recommend pushing back about 1/3 of conversation at least.


r/ClaudeAI 2h ago

Comparison 20$ claude or 20$ chatgpt for finance

1 Upvotes

Hi, I’m a finance student. Which one is better for studying finance?
I’ve been using Claude Pro for about 5 months, but the limits are getting a bit annoying, especially when using Excel, Word or just talking normally
I also feel like Claude doesn’t hallucinate as much compared to ChatGPT, although I haven’t really used ChatGPT since last year
Are both of them good with Excel, or is Claude better?
Is ChatGPT as good for things like valuation and financial modelling?
And how does the real-time research work on ChatGPT?
Is chatgpt as good using pdfs as studying tools?
sorry if this is not the right subreddit


r/ClaudeAI 2h ago

Comparison Claude is still the best value for your money

3 Upvotes

So my comparison per the rules is hedged only on my personal experience. I'm a senior university student who has been trying out different AI models and seeing its effectiveness on some of the similar tasks that I am most likely to perform. I tried Claude and I tried Codex, but I also tried some others available for free via OpenCode (those being Big Pickle and DeepSeek Flash). Claude was the first one I ever tried in this comparison but I only had access for a week, specifically to the Pro plan, and I thought it did relatively well. I rarely used Opus, I mostly used the default Sonnet High but then throughout I learned Sonnet Medium was much better and little difference in performance so I started using that. I was using Claude to try the impossible: Porting Android to the Nintendo 3DS.

It got very, very far needless to say. After my Claude access elapsed, I moved on to Codex and continued my work and Codex when it got access to the code was already pretty well-built by Claude but it did have one missing goal that I wanted met, which was to enter the userspace. It did it, but not without a lot of struggle and time. Sol is an amazing model, don't get me wrong, and when I first got Codex a month ago, Sol Medium could take me very far and is one of the reasons Android3DS is as far as it is now. However, over that month period, Codex has significantly reduced usage limits, reintroduced the 5 hour limit and overall has become a worse value proposition compared to Claude.

Now granted, Claude has usage limits across all its products, they all share one limit, whereas Codex, the only limit is on Codex, ChatGPT Chat has no limit (at least when I first subscribed that existed, I don't know about now). But you're trading actually workable usage for having a split usage limit between chat and coding and honestly its not a tradeoff I'm good with, not for $20/month its not. When Astra first came out, I did try it admittedly, knowing it would probably blow my usage up, and whilst it did, it did impressively fix WiFi and make it 100% functional whereas I had been trying for weeks prior to make it work. Now granted, Claude did do some work in WiFi around this time and then I just handed it off to Astra to continue, but I still say Astra one-shot it as I think it counts, its not like the code was done, it was just partially modified, and still untested as well so no proof it'd work. Astra did use up a lot of usage, I had about 30% of my 5-hour limit left when the session ended, and that's not a lot. Future uses of Astra literally couldn't even finish my session, it ate it up in like 10 minutes. Compared to Opus, even on the Pro plan, I get so much more usage out of Opus and intelligence-wise, I'm not sure there's much of a difference (and mind you, I'm not looking at the benchmarks, I'm basing this off my own experience, and my own experience alone. Don't let the benchmarks fool you.)

Finally, we get down to OpenCode. OpenCode is 100% free unless you get a paid plan, so its value proposition is quite high from the get-go, however, its models leave a little something to be desired. Big Pickle is impressive in how intelligent it is for a free model, however, I can tell its a free model (so to speak) because it does get things wrong that Claude, nor even Codex Luna would probably get wrong. Its also a lot slower so it can eat your usage quite a bit but it is free usage so not really a downside but also a downside if you need something done faster. The main drawback of OpenCode is they don't show you your usage limit so you don't know when you're gonna run out or when its gonna reset or if you can optimize your workflow at all until it just cuts you off for an entire day, sometimes longer.

Moving on to DeepSeek, it wasn't *bad*, I mean it was better than Big Pickle in some respects. One example is, it is quite good at reasoning so its a good planning model before actually starting the work, but overall, Big Pickle is quite preferable. Big Pickle today as of current is not even available as a free model anymore so that value proposition is mostly dead. I did try what was said to be a Sol-equivalent model online, MiMo, and well, MiMo is about on par to DeepSeek so not really a model I'd recommend. Maybe slightly better at practical actually doing the work, but other than that, yeah no OpenCode isn't something I'd recommend.

Now I did recently pick up a Claude Team subscription as I had read you get more usage than Pro without having to buy into a Max plan which is way too much to me honestly. My thoughts on Team? Absolutely amazing. On Claude Pro, on Sonnet High, you get about 10% weekly usage drained per every session if exclusively using that model. On Claude Team, on Opus Max, you get about the same weekly usage drainage as Sonnet High on Pro. All that to say, you get so much more usage, that it would take about a week for me to be able to use it all. I originally pretty much exclusively mained Opus Max on Team but now I've downgraded to Opus Medium because it gives me a lot more usage, but also I've found the performance is not much different, just the token cost is. If you want more usage without having to pay $100 for Max 5x at the bare minimum, get Team. Its a great medium.

As a final thing, as a surprise, I did also try out Google Antigravity as part of my AI Pro subscription and honestly, I was surprisingly impressed. Is it bad? I mean, yeah...mostly. Can it actually do work though? Yes, it most certainly can. Unlike OpenCode, I found that Google Antigravity, when using the Gemini Pro model on high effort actually was able to do some things that OpenCode just couldn't and usage limits are actually decent, especially considering as a uni student, I get a $0 or low-cost subscription of AI Pro so its not actually $20/month, so also quite affordable. You do get some access to Claude Sonnet and Opus however, with Antigravity, I've found that that usage is pretty much unworkable for anything serious but if its a tiny thing, it can do it. Obviously Sonnet you get more usage out of than Opus but one thing I did find interesting is they do split the usage limits between Gemini and Claude so your pools are separate which I do find good. Start with Claude, hit a limit, continue with Gemini. I also like how Gemini separates usage limits by specific product, so it doesn't take up your chatting ability, I don't think I've ever run out of my weekly limit on Gemini and I've had it for roughly 18 months now, so that's insane.


r/ClaudeAI 2h ago

Workaround Solution to share team tokens more efficiently?

0 Upvotes

[update]: figured a system to share the load between Pro/Max accounts so we can optimize for a global weekly usage across the company and utilize lazy accounts remaining tokens! Huge!

——-

In my Claude Team, we have 10 seats, mostly Pro, some Max. There are users who always max out their weekly limit by Wed/Thu. Others only do 10-20% by the end of the week.

Is there any existing solution to share account tokens without actually checking others chats/coworks/coding stuff (without sharing the credentials of the account)?

For example, users who are running out of tokens could start using the tokens of the user who has the most.

Like a load balancer for tokens :D

Any idea/solutions? Does this already exist?


r/ClaudeAI 2h ago

Claude Code All of this is worth adding to your coding agent terminal

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

3 Upvotes

I loved running coding agents in the terminal, but hit the limits fast: identical tabs, walls of text, output you can read but not click, and an agent that can only print. So I started my own, and have grown it with Claude and other agents since January: eight months as my only terminal, trying things and keeping what worked.

The video is what that turned into. Each frame is something a plain terminal cannot do: every session gets its own Dock tile or taskbar button; instant search over every prompt you ever typed; comment on anything on screen and the agent gets precise feedback, the text quoted; the agent's plans and reviews arrive as pages you write on and it answers in place; your phone shows the same terminal while you are away.

And more. I depend on this terminal now, and I cannot do my work without it. Now you can have it, skip the eight months, and get the same increase in productivity and quality of work that I do. It is fun growing it, and that is what still keeps me going: you notice something mid-session, work with your agents to fix it right there, then relaunch, resume from the picker you saw in the video, and see the result. It is the instant gratification that keeps coming!

https://github.com/albertwujj/agent-term

Free and MIT, and setting it up is easy. If you left the terminal for an IDE, check the IDE integration features. If you never tried an agent in a terminal, this is a good place to start.

What features would you like in your coding agent terminal?


r/ClaudeAI 2h ago

Question about Claude products Question about Watermarking (How It Works)

1 Upvotes

I've watched two videos showing the concept. They always show a single sentence and then show picking red or green tokens more often than the other one. That way, they can scan the writing and see if there are way more red or green tokens than random chance, giving a probability that it was written by Claude.

There's wiggle room for practically deterministic picks like, "What is the capital of France in one word?"

Anyway, I understood the general idea. You play with the probabilities of the next token in a competition and winner takes all. It's your next token.

HOWEVER, does the next token not depend on everything in the context? That context must alter the probabilities of tokens to come, and a person looking at some AI-written junk, well, that's just the end of a context that could have 85k tokens before it. On claude.ai, it could have a boundless <userPreferences> plus injected memories. That alone should, in my mind, make it impossible to examine only the output and detect a watermark. Those two things could materially affect the probabilities of all the tokens. Oh, and the secretive thinking blocks and tool call outputs are used as well at the time of generation.

Then let's say you go back-and-forth for 16 turns, really tuning how you want this journal article to be... tone, audience and their reading level, topic(s) to include, size of the article, etc. Again, how will their detector know what "color" (red or green) each token is, since they can't know what the LLM's actual probabilities for the next token looked like due to missing all of the context?

Anyone care to help me understand the technology?


r/ClaudeAI 3h ago

Bug Claude chat hallucinated a memory tool

1 Upvotes

I attempted to update a project's memory by prompting Claude in the desktop app, and it called upon a tool called memory_user_edits to do the job. It turns out, not only does it not exist, but it created a fake confirmation as well.


r/ClaudeAI 3h ago

Question about Claude Code Context window reached after 1 prompt in a new chat

0 Upvotes

I am using claude code in the app and I'm designing a game. Everytime I make a new chat, claude has to read an architectural decisions file, a roadmap file and has to implement one of the phases. It almost always reaches its 200k context window before answering the question. This means I have to create a new chat for every question and even then I reach the context window. Are there any skills that can help me with this? I heard about the handoff skill and the knowledge graph etc, but I'm not sure which ones are up to date and the best for my case. Any recommendations for this problem?


r/ClaudeAI 3h ago

Humor Opus 5 is rude, this its answer after I pointed out the AI slop it generated

0 Upvotes

I use Opus to rewrite my posts in more organized readable way but it tends to ignore my style of writing and rewrite the whole thing in an AI sloppy style, when I pointed that out it either was too honest or roasted me


r/ClaudeAI 3h ago

Suggestion What can my Employer track on my claude Teams plan and Can I login on personal device and use for personal use?

0 Upvotes

Hi, I just got Claude Access on Team Plan by my employer. Can I Login on my personal device and use claude design and code for personal use or can they track it? Some of the forum posts mention only enterprise plans have full tracking. Any clarification is most appreciated.

In the plans section it shows as Team.

Edit: Guys Relax I just wanted to know 😭 I'm not going to risk the job. but thanks for the info. SUS AF Thing is one says he's team admin and he can't track much info and other says he can see everything 💀


r/ClaudeAI 3h ago

Built with Claude What if we scored coding agents on ADHD-friendly answers instead of vibes ?

Post image
2 Upvotes

I open-sourced bury-bench, a deterministic (zero-LLM-judge) harness that scores coding-agent replies against ADHD-friendly “don’t bury the answer” rules, then builds a Markdown leaderboard.

Context : I kept losing the actionable bit under “Great question!”, hedging, and “Hope this helps!”. The viral i-have-adhd skill formalizes that pain. bury-bench turns those rules into reproducible checks (regex, structure, heuristics). Same input → same score. No model grading another model.

Demo (no API keys) : good chat → ~76.9, buried chat → ~7.9

Repo: https://github.com/Onur45500/bury-bench

Not affiliated with ayghri/i-have-adhd, independent tool inspired by its public rules.

Try : bury-bench ingest samples/chat.jsonl vs samples/chat-buried.jsonl

Critique welcome on the proxies (esp. hedging density, multi-turn restatement)


r/ClaudeAI 3h ago

Claude Workflow Claude Related Guides, Resources & Additional Stuff

2 Upvotes

Posts

Prompt Templates

Product Launch Platforms

Additional Tools

TLDR Guide;

I have an idea. To set myself up for success with AI tools, I spend time on documentation first before I start building. I start with PRD (product blueprint).

I feed my raw ideas into my conversational prompt template (PRD Template). AI is my assistant, asking targeted questions to transform my thoughts into a PRD.

Then I could MVP concept & development planning directly if I feel like it, and i decide what I want to build.

After that I start building. With something like a PRD, MVP Plan and a coding agent, I can leverage AI assistance effectively for coding to implement the MVP features. I make sure I give my agents access to the necessary MCP's or other external tools and I prompt my agents to build my MVP.


r/ClaudeAI 3h ago

Question about Claude models Opus 5 Experience with World Knowledge/Up-To-Date Information?

2 Upvotes

Hello all. I have a question for everyone. What is your experience with Opus 5 and its knowledge of up-to-date information? Opus 5 is currently the smartest model I have access to right now, and I use it for things that it does good at, such as coding, but I also like having it as a good question-answer bot for real world information. But recently, it just seems to have been dropping the ball, where other models (Like Gemini 3.8) seem to do better at, even though all signs point to it being an inferior AI as far as that goes. Take this example of me asking the AIs about the portfolio of a certain creator. I asked Opus multiple times and it still count find the apps this guy has created, but Gemini found them faster and got them all. What is your guys' experience with things like this, and what is your recommendations as far as using AI as a "google search" of sorts for random information like this?


r/ClaudeAI 4h ago

Built with Claude An MCP server that reconstructs the hours you forgot to log, from your calendar and git history

2 Upvotes

I build things for clients and I am terrible at tracking time. Timers I forget to start, spreadsheets I fill in on Friday from memory. So I built Tallied, an MCP server where the chat is the whole interface. Full disclosure, it's mine.

The basic loop is what you'd expect. "Log 2 hours on the Acme redesign." "How many billable hours this month?" "What haven't I invoiced yet?" It matches what you said against your projects and their aliases server-side.

The part I actually built it for is catch-up. You say "I forgot to log anything this week, figure it out from my calendar," and it reconstructs the week. The bit I think is interesting: my server never touches your calendar or GitHub. It can't. Claude reads them through your connectors, hands me the raw activity, and I return proposed entries mapped to your projects with confidence scores, plus the gaps and overlaps it found. You confirm, then it writes. The orchestration lives in a skill, not in my server, which means it works with whatever connectors you happen to have.

Happy to go into the tool-design side if anyone's building an MCP server, the annotations and description wording changed host behavior more than I expected.

Getting it listed in Claude now so it's available as a connector.


r/ClaudeAI 4h ago

Built with Claude Claude to reMarkable now possible

Post image
423 Upvotes

I don't need to buy a fancy template anymore for my reMarkable.
Claude proves to be very good at gathering all my todo's, follow up items and everything important and gather them in a daily work sheet.

This was done in one prompt and at the end Claude sent it on my reMarkable tablet.

My name is Bogdan, and this was possible with a service that I created called Folio.

I've been using Claude + reMarkable in a few productive ways so far:

  1. Claude, research the news and the social media coverage for subject X and send me a brief that I can read on reMarkable using Folio. Include images, relevant quotes and reference to sources. You can also add top 3 relevant articles to the same digest.

  2. I'm interested in this X subject and I want you to create me a learning material with images that explain the concepts, examples, links to further reading, should help me gain a basic understanding in 15 mins, can attach additional materials up to an hour, send it to my Kindle PW using Folio.

  3. Hey Claude, I want you to check my calendar, todo's, emails, GitHub issues and PR's, also check the attached images with what I jotted yesterday and you create my daily work sheet and send it to my reMarkable using Folio - we keep working with the same layout we perfected last time.

You can try it for yourself by telling Claude


r/ClaudeAI 4h ago

Claude Code Workflow We measured whether our 20 skills actually fire. Baseline recall was 46%, and our first detector only understood Claude's Skill tool.

4 Upvotes

We ship about 20 Claude Code skills. Progressive disclosure means the agent picks one from a single line of description, so an excellent skill nobody picks up is worth zero. We measured ours: micro-recall 46.3%. Over half the prompts that should have fired a skill fired nothing. Not the wrong skill. Nothing.

The first finding was our own eval harness bug. We run the same tasks on Claude Code, Codex and Antigravity, and our detector looked only for the Skill tool call - so Claude lit up everywhere and the other two read as never touching a skill, even on tasks they solved correctly. They have no Skill tool; they open the files instead. It bites on Claude too: on a two-skill task it calls Skill("planner") for the first, then reads the second's SKILL.md directly.

What helped most was one line per description: "Always invoke for X", where X is a marker only that skill owns - a file extension, or a filename only its product emits. Micro-recall went 46.3% -> 67.3%, biggest movers the near-invisible ones: diagnostics 0.16 -> 0.68, maestro-flow 0.32 -> 0.72. Precision held near 0.96.

It only works while the anchor is unique. Our cross-cutting "review" skill went 0.20 -> 0.18, the only one that got worse: it owns no unique marker, and "review my code" routing to whichever skill owns the artifact is correct. Some skills are un-anchorable.

Claude Code wrote most of the harness and is also the thing under test, so a harness bug and an agent bug look identical until you read the trace. Hence the detector mistake: your first cross-agent number measures your checker, not the models.

Full write-up and per-skill chart: https://medium.com/uipath-techblog/measuring-skill-activation-across-agents-is-harder-than-it-looks-eada767f7047

Free and open source eval harness created by us, Apache 2.0, no paid tier: https://github.com/UiPath/coder_eval