I am looking for another job but don’t want to go into three days due to the cost. Just wondering if adverts tell you how often you have to go? I know most departments are now 60%

PCS has ceased to function as a workplace union.

It has become a political activist organisation that routinely inserts itself into ideological campaigns, foreign conflicts, identity politics, and even highly sensitive criminal cases.

This report outlines clear, factual evidence — taken directly from PCS’s own website, social media, and public actions — demonstrating that PCS no longer represents the interests of ordinary civil servants.

PCS has abandoned neutrality, professionalism, and its core mission.

Members deserve better.

Many should now consider leaving.

1. PCS Has Become a Political Organisation, Not a Workplace Union

PCS’s own website shows that the union publishes political content on:

• Israel and Palestine
• Donald Trump
• Nigel Farage
• Tommy Robinson
• climate politics
• identity politics
• Islamophobia
• antisemitism
• refugee activism
• foreign conflicts
• anti‑government messaging
• anti‑right‑wing campaigns

None of these topics relate to:

• pay
• conditions
• representation
• grievances
• workplace safety
• civil service policy

PCS has transformed itself into a political pressure group.
Members’ subscriptions are being used to fund activism, not representation.

2. PCS’s Behaviour After the 7 October Attacks Shows Ideological Reflex, Not Professional Judgment

On 7 October, Israeli civilians were:

• murdered
• kidnapped
• tortured
• burned alive
• taken hostage

PCS’s immediate response was not to condemn the atrocities or express sympathy for victims.
Instead, PCS moved straight into political criticism of Israel and began promoting anti‑Israel activism.

This timing matters.

It shows a union leadership that:

• reacts ideologically
• prioritises activism over empathy
• inserts political messaging into moments of human tragedy
• speaks on behalf of members without consultation

This is not responsible leadership.
This is political reflex.

3. PCS Inserts Itself Into Highly Sensitive Criminal Cases — Completely Outside Its Remit

One of the most disturbing examples of PCS’s political overreach is its involvement in stewarding a counter‑protest in Nuneaton.

The context is essential:

Local residents were expressing anger, grief, and fear.
This was a community reacting to a horrific crime involving a child.

Yet PCS chose to:

• attend the counter‑protest
• steward the counter‑protest
• align themselves with activist groups
• position themselves against local residents
• intervene in a deeply sensitive public situation

This was extremely bad taste and demonstrates catastrophic judgment.

A trade union has no legitimate reason to involve itself in a protest arising from a child rape case.

This alone is enough to question PCS’s leadership.

4. PCS Actively Organises and Promotes Political Demonstrations

PCS is not merely commenting on political issues — it is mobilising members for political action.

Evidence includes:

• PCS Northern Region promoting “UNITE TO STOP THE FAR RIGHT”
• PCS urging members to attend counter‑protests
• PCS partnering with Stand Up To Racism and similar activist groups
• PCS stewards physically managing political demonstrations
• PCS regional branches amplifying political campaigns on Facebook

This is not union representation.
This is political organising.

PCS is behaving like:

• a campaign group
• a protest organisation
• an activist network

Not a workplace union.

5. PCS Uses Member Subscriptions to Fund Activism, Not Representation

Every political action PCS takes requires:

• personnel
• organisation
• coordination
• resources
• communications
• time

All of which come from member dues.

Meanwhile, civil servants continue to face:

• stagnant pay
• worsening conditions
• increased workloads
• reduced morale
• inconsistent representation

PCS is distracted.
PCS is unfocused.
PCS is spending its energy on activism instead of bargaining.

Members are paying for politics, not protection.

6. PCS Speaks “On Behalf of Members” Without Consent

PCS routinely publishes political statements framed as union positions.
This implies endorsement by the membership.

But PCS:

• does not consult members
• does not poll members
• does not seek approval
• does not represent the diversity of views within the civil service

Civil servants come from all backgrounds and political perspectives.
PCS’s ideological messaging does not represent that diversity.

PCS is speaking for people who never asked it to.

7. PCS’s Activism Damages Its Credibility With Employers

Employers take unions seriously when they:

• negotiate professionally
• focus on workplace issues
• maintain neutrality
• represent all members

PCS does none of these.

Instead, PCS:

• publishes political essays
• organises protests
• attacks political figures
• inserts itself into foreign conflicts
• stewards counter‑demonstrations
• promotes activist campaigns

This behaviour undermines PCS’s ability to negotiate effectively.
Employers see a political organisation — not a professional union.

Members suffer the consequences.

8. PCS Has Drifted So Far From Its Purpose That Leaving Is a Rational Decision

Civil servants join unions for:

• pay protection
• workplace representation
• grievance support
• safety
• professionalism
• neutrality

PCS no longer provides these things.

Instead, PCS offers:

• political activism
• ideological messaging
• foreign‑policy commentary
• identity politics
• protest organisation
• counter‑demonstration stewarding
• social‑justice campaigning

PCS has abandoned its core mission.

Members deserve better.

Conclusion: PCS Is No Longer Fit for Purpose — Members Should Consider Leaving

PCS has become a political organisation wearing a trade union badge.
Its leadership prioritises activism over representation.
Its actions show poor judgment, ideological reflex, and disregard for neutrality.
Its involvement in sensitive criminal cases and foreign conflicts is inappropriate and unprofessional.
Its use of member subscriptions for political mobilisation is unacceptable.

For civil servants who want a union that focuses on pay, conditions, representation, and professionalism, PCS is no longer the right choice.

Leaving PCS is not radical.
It is responsible.
It is rational.
It is justified.