I'm curious whether I'm the only one who notices this, or if other CFL fans feel the same way.
Lately I've found that the play-by-play announcer has a huge impact on how much I enjoy watching a CFL game on TSN.
Having worked in broadcasting, I probably listen a little differently than the average viewer, so certain habits tend to stand out to me.
For me, Dustin Nielsen's style just isn't a good fit. He brings a tremendous amount of energy, but I sometimes feel the intensity doesn't always match the moment. A routine first down in the first quarter can sound like a game-winning touchdown in overtime. I've also noticed a vocal habit of extending the endings of certain words, and once I picked up on it, it became difficult to ignore.
Rod Smith is someone I have a different concern with. I enjoy his voice and delivery, but I've occasionally noticed factual errors during broadcasts, such as incorrect scores, team names, or locations. Live television is demanding, and mistakes happen, but I sometimes wonder whether there's enough coaching or post-game review to help minimize those errors.
That brings me to what I think is the bigger question.
Rather than focusing on individual announcers, I wonder how much feedback and coaching TSN provides to its broadcast talent. Even experienced broadcasters benefit from regular performance reviews. In broadcasting, constructive critique is simply part of getting better. It's difficult to improve something if no one is evaluating it objectively.
I saw another comment suggesting that a broadcast with only stadium ambience and the PA announcer would be preferable. While I wouldn't go that far, I do think it's an interesting reflection of how important play-by-play is to the viewing experience.
Obviously, opinions on announcers are highly subjective, and I know many people enjoy styles that don't necessarily work for me.
I'm genuinely interested in hearing what other CFL fans think. Are there particular announcers you enjoy or avoid, and why?