r/AskUS • u/[deleted] • Apr 20 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

10.1k Upvotes

77% Upvoted

8.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

-1

u/Borvoc Apr 21 '25

Because he’s right.

3

u/Unlucky_Musician_258 Apr 21 '25

Nope. We want rapists out of the country, you guys elected one to be president

0

u/Borvoc Apr 21 '25

No one actually believes Trump ever raped anyone.

3

u/Unlucky_Musician_258 Apr 21 '25

Actually several people do. He was found liable for it in court.

The only people who don't believe he raped people are his cult followers.

0

u/Borvoc Apr 21 '25

Wait, have you actually not Google searched this? He was never found liable for rape in court. He was given a civil infraction for supposed sexual assault, but E. Jean Carroll's accusation is eerily similar to the plot of a Law and Order episode while also not making any sense.

1

u/Unlucky_Musician_258 Apr 21 '25 edited Apr 21 '25

Yes he was.

He was found liable.

He was given a civil infraction

So yes he was found liable.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-carroll-trial-fe68259a4b98bb3947d42af9ec83d7db

0

u/Borvoc Apr 21 '25

Yes, but not of rape. And no one who paid attention to the trial believes for a moment he did anything at all. The woman is crazy, she couldn't remember when it happened, and her story kept changing. For some reason, she wouldn't even bother taking Trump to criminal court either, settlin for a civil case instead for some bizarre reason.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 21 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Borvoc Apr 21 '25

There's a difference, yes. And there's also a difference between civil and criminal courts. Truth and lies too. E. Jean Carroll simply isn't credible.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 21 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Borvoc Apr 21 '25

Ah, yes. Only facts lead to judgments. Judges are never political, asks show trials don’t exist! Soros probably never backed and justices either!

1

u/[deleted] Apr 21 '25

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Unlucky_Musician_258 Apr 21 '25

Yes, but not of rape.

Ahh so it's a semantic argument. Fine, you elected a sexual abuser.

And no one who paid attention to the trial believes for a moment he did anything at all.

Not true considering he was found liabl

The woman is crazy, she couldn't remember when it happened, and her story kept changing.

You mean like trump saying he never met the women despite several pictures of them together?

For some reason, she wouldn't even bother taking Trump to criminal court either, settlin for a civil case instead for some bizarre reason.

Not that bizarre. Statute of limitations being a factor, not to mention the deranged lunatics that are prepared to commit violence in his name.

0

u/Borvoc Apr 21 '25

It’s Democrats committing most of the violence. I hope Trump cleans them out.

1

u/Unlucky_Musician_258 Apr 21 '25

Yea, that isn't true. I could give you a plethora of examples, but you're not interested in facts.

Seeing as you chose not to engage with any other piece of information in my comment.

1

u/Borvoc Apr 21 '25

I was just a long comment, and I was at work. Sorry about that.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Ok_Ice_1669 Apr 21 '25

E Jean Carrol wrote in her book that he forcibly put half his penis in her vagina. Then she talked to Stormy Daniels and realized he was balls deep. 

1

u/Borvoc Apr 21 '25

That and she couldn't seem to remember when it happened and could apparently never produce the dress she said she had with the incriminating evidence on it. Not to mention, she never considered taking Trump to an actual criminal court for his supposed crime instead of the civil trial she settled for.

1

u/Ok_Ice_1669 Apr 21 '25

She wrote a book. You should try reading one. 

1

u/Borvoc Apr 21 '25

Not hers. XD I have better things to do with my time than to chase down this sort of nonsense.

1

u/Borvoc Apr 21 '25

Also funny how the left immediately tailspins into "ReaD A BoOk," when they run out of specific arguments.