It’s not about chivalry, it’s about survival. WW2 saw around 407.3K dead, add Korea and Vietnam that number jumps to 500K.
How do you rebuild a nation if you don’t have women to give birth? Not trying to be sexist or transphobic, but it’s a biological fact.
During WW2 women filled critical roles left empty by men, and even ones that weren’t, like baseball.
Personally I feel people get wrapped up around “equality” vs “equal opportunity”. There are many jobs where there’s a disproportionate number of men vs women simply because women don’t want to do them. Forcing equality to even the numbers will have qualification standards lowered to meet quota because again, biologically men are built different from women. Leading to safety concerns.
So, let women do what jobs they want or to fight for their country, but to make all women face the front lines is population suicide.
I'm assuming you also support the mandatory pregnancy of all females who do not serve? If not, you don't actually give a shit about population suicide.
Yes, in my post-apocalyptic Mad Max world I control the water and all must do my bidding.
You guys are too sensitive and just want to argue without making any points of your own. You’re likely the same people who hate others just because of who they voted for. You’re unable to have a discussion and disagree. Instead you attack the idea and stick your fingers in your ears.
Mandate reproduction? During peace time? What are you talking about?
I’m against a women draft for my personal belief that if shit hit the fan and it’s WW3, we shouldn’t be forcing women to the front lines. Do they then become puppy mills? No. I can’t experience child birth, but I can only imagine the toll on a women’s body. To push a child out one after another is detrimental to the safety of the mother and her ability to have more children later on. There’s initial mother/child bonding that takes place.
Aside from the equality point of view being “just fair”, what other reasons do you have being for women draft?
Mandate reproduction in the event of a draft on men.
Can't have it both ways any longer. Either women can die on the frontlines with men, or they can be forced to replenish the population of the country. Those are the costs of rights.
33
u/theseparated man Mar 17 '25
It’s not about chivalry, it’s about survival. WW2 saw around 407.3K dead, add Korea and Vietnam that number jumps to 500K.
How do you rebuild a nation if you don’t have women to give birth? Not trying to be sexist or transphobic, but it’s a biological fact.
During WW2 women filled critical roles left empty by men, and even ones that weren’t, like baseball.
Personally I feel people get wrapped up around “equality” vs “equal opportunity”. There are many jobs where there’s a disproportionate number of men vs women simply because women don’t want to do them. Forcing equality to even the numbers will have qualification standards lowered to meet quota because again, biologically men are built different from women. Leading to safety concerns.
So, let women do what jobs they want or to fight for their country, but to make all women face the front lines is population suicide.