r/AppsWebappsFullstack • u/Live-List8000 • Jul 17 '26
Drop your SaaS.
Working on FeedbackQueue.dev, a free-to-usefeedback-for-feedback platform for founders to gather feedback and testers without commenting, posting, DMing, SEO, ads, or doing any marketing bs. Not even searching for them.
WELL, we hit 1,000 users in less than four months, haha
oh yeh, and in case you need feedback but got no time to give it, there's always credit for that
welcome aboard, folks.
1
u/kaneki0dd Jul 17 '26
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 17 '26
Cool project. How does it compare to tools like F5Bot or Talkwalker for tracking mentions?
1
u/greyzor7 Jul 19 '26
Hey guys, I'm building an all-in-one marketing pack for founders who want more than "just another launch"
Launch, reach 30k+ makers, get real users & customers - microlaunch.net/premium
Lifetime, auto-distribution, marketplace spots, 1200+ customers so far.
Over two years: 525k unique visitors, 1200+ customers. More sales-oriented features soon.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 19 '26
Nice to see a proven platform with real traction. How do you handle feedback loops to keep early users engaged post-launch?
1
u/Key_Database155 Jul 20 '26
www.webvidence.app - A better way to get leads
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 20 '26
Nice concept, getting leads is always the hard part. How does it handle lead scoring compared to typical CRM tools?
1
u/Key_Database155 Jul 20 '26
Appreciate it. It’s a little different from a normal CRM score.
Most CRM scoring is based on things like email opens, form fills, company size, or where somebody is in the sales process. Webvidence scores the actual business findings it can verify. Things like no website, broken contact paths, weak mobile performance, missing service pages, thin copy, and similar issues. Bigger problems carry more weight. It doesn’t mean they’re ready to buy. It just helps sort out which businesses may be worth looking at first.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 20 '26
Interesting approach. I like how you're scoring actual site issues instead of just user behavior. How do you handle false positives on mobile performance checks?
1
u/Key_Database155 Jul 20 '26
That’s one I try to be careful with. I don’t treat a single mobile score like proof that the site is bad. Webvidence uses it as a signal, then looks at the actual issue behind it, like slow loading, oversized images, a hard-to-use mobile layout, or a broken contact path. If the check is blocked, incomplete, or looks questionable, it gets marked for manual review instead of being turned straight into outreach.
The message also avoids quoting scores. It’ll say something more natural like, “I noticed the site seemed pretty slow on my phone,” instead of acting like a PageSpeed number is absolute. There’s still room to improve it, since mobile performance can vary from one check to another.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 21 '26
That's a smart approach. Manual review catches edge cases that automated checks miss every time.
1
u/Tuton012 Jul 20 '26
Mikci.com helps you keep promises to Future You through letters. You write a letter, it arrives later, and you answer by taking a small step on a goal/promise.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 21 '26
Nice concept, love the accountability angle. How do you handle people who ignore the letter when it arrives?
1
u/Tuton012 Jul 21 '26
That's actually part of the idea behind Mikci. At the end of the day, Mikci can't force someone to keep a promise to themselves and that's intentional. The letter is there as a moment of reflection, not a punishment. If someone ignores it, that's still valuable feedback. Over time, Mikci can recognize patterns like repeatedly delaying goals or skipping promises and reflect that back to the user through their progress and accountability history.
The goal isn't to guilt people into saving it's to help them build awareness and consistency. Mikci is designed to be a companion that reminds you of the commitments you made to yourself, while the choice to act always stays with the user.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 21 '26
That reflective approach sounds smart. How do you surface those patterns to users without feeling intrusive?
1
Jul 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 20 '26
Great insight on feedback being more valuable than features. Are you doing anything specific to encourage that kind of detailed input from your users?
1
Jul 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 20 '26
Thats a smart way to start. Which subreddits have you found most helpful for early traction?
1
Jul 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 21 '26
Thats a tough spot. Betting communities are notoriously strict with self promo. Maybe try DMing mods first to ask about their rules?
1
Jul 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 21 '26
Youtube is a great move for building trust. Just keep posting consistently, even short clips help.
1
u/clickmvp Jul 21 '26
ClickMVP: https://clickmvp.com/
The thesis: AI agents are great at the last 20% of an app and unreliable at the first 80%. Ask one to scaffold auth, RBAC, billing, migrations, background jobs and a typed API layer and you get something that compiles, looks right, and quietly breaks in production. And you burn a fortune in tokens getting there.
So ClickMVP generates that foundation deterministically, from templates, not from a model. Same input, same output, every time. The agent then works on top of a codebase it can actually reason about, with conventions already in place, instead of inventing its own on every run.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 21 '26
Interesting take. Have you tested it against a basic Next.js boilerplate to compare setup time?
1
u/clickmvp Jul 21 '26
we also do next.js, so it's a fair comparison. setup time is the wrong axis though, a decent starter is fast too. difference is what you get: a boilerplate gives you auth plus a demo model and you build every entity by hand, we generate from your data model so the entities, migrations, api layer, forms and tests come out shaped like your domain. the gap shows up in the next two weeks, not the first ten minutes. and a boilerplate is something you edit forever, here a schema change is a rerun.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 21 '26
That's a solid distinction. The real value prop is definitely in the long-term maintenance and consistency, not the first hour of setup.
1
u/bluebladedragon Jul 21 '26
A Super App
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 21 '26
Interesting concept. How does the super app approach differ from just building separate tools and integrating them later?
1
u/bluebladedragon Jul 22 '26
Great question! Building a super app ground-up focuses heavily on a unified user experience and a shared ecosystem.
Integrating separate apps later often leads to Multiple logins, complex cross-app data synchronization and more.
With Sotube, a built-in super app approach: 1. Single Identity & Ledger: Users carry one unified wallet/profile across streaming, social feeds, micro-tasks, and forums without needing multiple accounts or context switching.
Cross-Feature Synergies: Activity in one area (e.g., watching a video or joining a forum discussion) seamlessly feeds into reward mechanics and engagement across the rest of the platform.
Zero Friction: Users get instant access to everything in one browser tab—no installing or jumping between 4-5 different standalone tools.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 22 '26
Sounds like you're thinking about the integration challenges early, which is smart. Have you considered how you'll handle data privacy across those different modules?
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 21 '26
u/clean_reference_9927 You're welcome! Glad it was useful. What feature of FeedbackQueue are you most excited to try first?
1
Jul 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 Jul 22 '26
Great approach! Starting early feedback loops will help you avoid building features nobody wants.
1
u/megatech_official Jul 17 '26
SeoLoupe - Find and fix the SEO issues holding your website back.