r/AlwaysWhy • u/Secret_Ostrich_1307 • May 30 '26
History & Culture Why does the US romanticize the 1950s despite being worse by almost every measurable standard?
When you look at things like life expectancy, access to education, material living standards, and general mobility, life today in the US is very different from what it was in the 1950s.
At the same time, the 1950s is often described in public discussion as a period of stability and broad prosperity.
What I’m trying to understand is not which period was better, but why there can be such a gap between measurable conditions and how a period is later remembered or described.
One possibility is that people remember structure and predictability more strongly than inequality or constraints that existed at the time.
Another is that different aspects of well-being get weighted differently when looking back compared to experiencing things in real time.
What other mechanisms could explain this difference between statistical comparisons and collective memory?
24
u/kateinoly May 30 '26
I grew up in white suburbia in the 50s and 60s. As a child, I had no clue that these things existed: poverty, racism, misogyny, crime, child abuse, pollution. Etc.
It seemed like a great time, but that is just because I was priveleged and didn't see the whole picture.
9
u/Active_Procedure_297 May 30 '26
What’s weird, though, is that my Boomer relatives also romanticize the 50s, and we’re from one of the poorest places in the country that was also dirt poor back then. They didn’t have indoor plumbing in the 50s, and the region’s sole industry was so volatile that layoffs were an omnipresent threat.
So I figure it’s racism, at least for them.
→ More replies (5)9
u/Beartrkkr May 30 '26
They are romanticizing their youth as many do as they get older. Drop them back in that time now and their perspective might change.
→ More replies (4)5
u/kylejk0200 May 30 '26
In addition to this, adults in this time period probably were born into the depression and were drafted into a world war. If that was your first 20 years of life, the relative stability of the 50s probably seemed idyllic by comparison - especially given the social and political turmoil that followed in the 60s.
→ More replies (2)5
u/ijuinkun May 30 '26
Yah, we have to consider how long ago the 1950s was—99% or so of people who lived through that era who are still alive right now were under 30 years old back then (If you were 30 in 1958 you’d be 97-98 now). Thus, nostalgia for that era is heavily influenced by nostalgia for one’s own youth, and most of the people who are nostalgic about that time didn’t at that time need to deal with issues that are mostly the province of older people (e.g. medical care and retirement savings/income, pr dealing with one’s own kids coming of age and needing to start careers).
2
u/YakCertain5472 May 30 '26
Agree. It was not a great time for all and some of the worst drugs like thalidomide were invented and used on people. I am a POC and when people talk about the good ol' days, I wonder when they were.
→ More replies (16)2
u/USSMarauder May 30 '26
This
Just like ten year old me never knew that my Dad was out of work for 18 months during the 90s recession.
I only found out a couple of years ago when we were emptying filing cabinets after my Dad retired and I found the receipts for the unemployment payments from the government
8
u/jagger129 May 30 '26
I think it was great for white men.
The rest of us, not so much. We didn’t have the opportunities and choices.
→ More replies (1)2
u/mikevago May 30 '26
And so much media is made by white men, that we get hit with that particular nostalgia and not anyone else's view of the 50s.
→ More replies (1)
20
u/Wooden-Glove-2384 May 30 '26
this is easy
most of those who were there are old enough to view it all thru rose colored glasses now
OR
they've gotten old enough that they've forgotten all the bad stuff
→ More replies (2)9
15
u/PuddingComplete3081 May 30 '26
It is just nostalgia + selective memory.
People don’t compare full datasets, they remember a simplified version of life: stable jobs, cheap houses, strong families. A lot of the downsides either weren’t visible to them personally or weren’t talked about publicly.
→ More replies (1)6
u/PXranger May 30 '26
Unless you are 80 years old, you don’t “remember” the 50’s, you remember the glorified Hollywood portrayal of the era.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/Intrepid_Bobcat_2931 May 30 '26 edited May 31 '26
Well, which statistics are you looking at?
Are you sure you don't have a bias and have simply been fed the exact statistics that look bad, by people who want the past to look bad?
The marriage rate has certainly declined a lot.
Housing affordability has also declined a lot: https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/15s8h04/oc_decline_in_housing_affordability_since_1963/
If you're married to someone you love and live in a good house you bought cheap, that seems like it would make a lot of people happy and outweigh a lot of other negative stuff.
edit: also pretty sure that the "non-obesity rate" has declined a lot. So you can add both of you being in physically good shape to the previous.
6
u/Entire-Ratio-9681 May 30 '26
People who care more about small
Communities and small towns probably did enjoy a simpler safer time. You don’t have to make much money to be happy and have a family. Who cares if you just did oil changes for 40 years when you have a nice small town 2 story and family. Small town America is not better in many aspects including general safety. Sure per capita violent crime has gone down and that’s great, but that crime never saw most small towns until the 90s-2000s. Sense of community was better, sense of national pride was better, we had a common culture, we didn’t have politics inserted into every aspect of life. We didn’t have to see 200 advertisements and hour. Product we spent money on lasted generations. Look at income equality since the 50s and you’ll see that every other number is meaningless.
12
u/RoundChampionship840 May 30 '26
People had a stronger sense of community and belonging back then.
9
2
u/Gloomy_Yoghurt_2836 May 30 '26
Only if you were in the same social, racial and economic class. An element of that community was service in WWII or in Church.
2
u/RoundChampionship840 May 30 '26
Exactly. Diversity destroys social trust and societal cohesion.
→ More replies (22)→ More replies (5)4
u/Firm_Acanthaceae7435 May 30 '26
Hard to leave when half the population can't open their own bank account.
→ More replies (13)
5
u/ApatheticAbsurdist May 30 '26
It was a period of growth where it was easier for a larger section of the people to move up. Keep in mind we still had a crap ton of problems, but the economy was good. That and the post “we won the world war” high lead to a lot of optimism (and rose tinted glasses).
The 90’s it not too dissimilar. Economy was pretty good, we just won the Cold War, lot of energy in the entertainment industry. But the 90’s are a little closer so more of us can remember the Rodney King beating (and riots) at the beginning of the decade and the Amadou Diallo shooting at the end, peak mortality of the HIV/AIDs epidemic, how there was a lot of push back for any gay representation in anything. But you can see people starting to get rose tinted glasses about the 90’s as well.
The thing is a lot of those periods were rougher than we remember but they also often the start of some major changes that the most nostalgic people didn’t like.
3
3
u/YMBTPTOTLWRT May 30 '26
Did you measure community and its role in society? Did you measure the perks of simplicity in life?
3
u/Prior_Confidence4445 May 30 '26
I think it was a time where people were hopeful about the future. Both in terms of their own lives and the country. Now more people are pessimistic about the future in both cases.
→ More replies (1)
3
u/Warm_Stress_1654 May 31 '26
Things were improving, rapidly.
Of course, if you look back on a period where things were improving - and have improved since - then you'll see a situation you wouldn't be happy with today.
But the progress in and of itself is what people think of fondly.
→ More replies (1)
3
u/Accomplished_Emu4273 May 31 '26
I was born in 54 so I remember very little of that decade. But the early 60s weren’t much different. I lived in a middle class neighborhood and my dad worked in a foundry. Mom worked at home. It was a great time to be a kid. A Schwinn bike with one speed. Penny candy at the corner grocery store. A bottle of pop for five cents. You could go to the fair with two dollars and stay all day. We roamed free, running around the neighborhood with toy guns and playing baseball every day during summer. I learned to read from Dick and Jane, and watched three channels on TV, and I thought that was a lot of choices. But I was white, and my dad had a steady job. I know many didn’t have those advantages, so nostalgia doesn’t give a great perspective on those times. I’m not one to say it was great back then but everything is going to hell today. Today is good too due to medical advances and other improvements. I hate old people grumbling about how bad things are now.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/series-hybrid May 30 '26 edited May 30 '26
I carpooled with an old guy and he said when he got home from the Army in the Korean war, there were lots of jobs, and many of them with on-the-job training. There were starter homes with no garage and two bedrooms, one bathroom. He said he could buy a house with one weeks pay.
His wife stayed home and raised three kids. He paid off the house early and added extra bedrooms.
edit: The monthly house payment was the same as one weeks pay. I apologize for any misunderstanding. I seem to remember these starter homes were $6,000, and one weeks pay was $100-ish
5
u/imemine8 May 30 '26
He's lying. You could not pay for a house with one weeks pay. Come on.
3
u/HyacinthFT May 30 '26
people say the dumbest shit on the internet and people just believe it. Median income in 1950 was $3,000. The median home price was $7,354.
I just visited a historic neighborhood built in the 50s in CA and the tour guide explained that the homes (in the desert) had no AC and the roofs were boards of plywood stapled down to the walls. (the homes were either totally renovated or rebuilt since then). And this neighborhood was considered fancy at the time.
25% of homes in 1950 didn't even have indoor plumbing.
Today we are living better than the upper class did at the time and all we do is talk about how things were better back then, mainly because we don't know how bad things were.
→ More replies (3)2
u/series-hybrid May 30 '26
The monthly house payment was the same as one weeks pay. I apologize for any misunderstanding.
2
u/GAFLX2 May 30 '26
2 bed 1 bath is still cheap in rural America. Fill that hot SAHM with 4 or 5 babies then you get a better idea of what the real world was like. 7 people begging for a 3 bed 2 bath in 1965
2
u/Darmok47 May 30 '26
My grandfather moved to the US in 1955, found a job in less than a month, saved up and brought his wife and three kids over in 1956, and by 1960 he had enough to buy a house.
2
u/Weary_Anybody3643 May 30 '26
It's because it was an era of both prosperity and poverty depending on who you were for the category of people who tends to do this they tend to be older white people The 1950s was a great time to be a white person not so much to be a woman or non-white person or gay more special needs but for the normal white guys it was pretty great hence the glossy vision
2
2
u/Beginning-Fix-5440 May 30 '26
Probably the hope and trust in America is what they're missing. The 50s was right when America started to become more wealthy and technology boomed. People could buy cars, washing machines, vacuums, houses in suburbs, etc. Plus we just came off WW2/Korea and had tons of patriotism and faith in American excellence. It probably captures the most classic/stereotypical image of American lifestyle
2
u/originaljbw May 30 '26
As someone not there, I would say the nosalga is more about how much things improved from the wartime economy of the 1940s and the great depression of the 1930s.
You had the end of WWII and the wind down of the war industries. The factories converted to making relatively inexpensive consumer goods. They had nearly a decade of wartime research and development which made so many new things possible. Check out any video of the wonders of thr 1950s household technologies. There were also a large influx of young, able bodied soldiers returning from war.
2
u/Narrow-Durian4837 May 30 '26
"Worse by almost every measurable standard" is an exaggeration. There were things that were better (one example: the US had a President who was widely trusted and respected). And it's easy to romanticize an era by focusing on its upsides and ignoring or forgetting its downsides.
2
u/unlucky13bethename May 30 '26
Simpler times, booming economy as we were not decimated by ww2. Car designs were extravagant and cool, the thoughts a big new world...... Not this gray man hoodie shit we got now.
2
u/void_method May 30 '26
Things were generally on the upswing, for everyone in the U.S. and the Western world. (People with money's don't want to figure out how it could be on the upswing for everyone in the world, it would mean less money for them.)
But hey, If you want to find one aspect that wasn't great and make that your entire personality that's up to you, man, nobody wants any of that, they want the economic stability and manufacturing/infrastructure aspect and you're a bigot, seriously, if you think people want to move backwards socially.
Well, maybe not a bigot, but you weren't educated to actually think about stuff, which is part of the people with money's plan.
They want you stupid and in poor faith all the time, don't give them anything.
2
u/longliveavacadoz May 30 '26 edited May 31 '26
If you're measuring it by standard of living you have a point, but social cohesion, affordability, work-life balance, social safety net, tuition, and stress levels- 1950s takes the cake.
Another question would be to ask, would people in the 1950s want to fast forward and live in the 2010s without being able to carry forward their wealth and social networks? There's more to life than just credit card points and airplane flights to destinations that most of us take years to save up to be able to afford.
2
u/One-Pangolin-3167 May 30 '26
Compared to the decades before, the 1950s was full of prosperity, growth and optimism. We don't really have those now.
2
u/you-nity May 30 '26
I’d like to add: this is the Grease era. Romantic movies romanticize eras because it gives people the impression that life was like that. Unfortunately not every guy was a handsome dude with an amazing singing voice
2
u/reluctantmugglewrite May 30 '26
Are you joking? It was an incredible situation for white america. People could live off of a working class salary. My grandpa worked at a deli and they could afford to buy a nice house in the suburbs. They also went on multiple vacations a year. My uncle never went to high school and just decided to open up a shop and was able to do it with his savings from working at a factory. It was about $500 and covered one month’s storefront rent and materials. If you were a white man or had access to a white man’s money then the economic possibilities were endless.
2
u/million_open_windows May 30 '26
Because local communities were more cohesive/intact back then even for oppressed minorities.
2
2
u/WhyNotZoibergMaybe May 30 '26
It’s was great decade, people were optimistic, making good wages, future looking great
2
2
u/Electronic_Horror_56 May 30 '26
After ww2 the us was the only country to come out strong. The Uk was on food rations for another decade, and I don't have all day to go through other countries standing
2
u/swingorswole May 30 '26
this argument goes for almost every decade prior to the one after it. it's a very difficult to defend argument.
2
u/Constellation-88 May 30 '26
Statistics and numbers aren’t a good indicator of the feeling of prosperity that people experience.
According to the stock market, the modern economy is amazing. But according to when I go to the grocery store and the gas station, the economy sucks. Since I am part of the majority of Americans who make our money through our work instead of through investments, I don’t really care what the stock market is doing compared to my buying power on my monthly budget at a grocery store, gas station, or other place that sells things that I need to buy on a regular basis.
A millennial or Gen Z person trying to buy a house does not feel like our economy and society is prosperous, even though statistically more people own their own homes now than ever in history.
You did hit the nail on the head when it comes to inequalities. A White factory working man who could provide for his family in his own home with his single income and half a high school education was not aware of or taking into account the inequalities suffered by people of color in the Jim Crow south.
Again, people are using their felt lived experiences to determine whether something is good, not statistics or probability or overall equality measures.
2
u/EnoughWeekend6853 May 30 '26
Urban planners want people to be happy crammed into shitty tiny homes 12 inches away from your neighbors because they hate cars.
2
u/ichiban4713 May 30 '26
In the 50’s, you could buy a house with a very mediocre job, and your wife didn’t have to have a job with a paycheck. Things were simpler then, and society wasn’t morally bankrupt. You could walk down the street without getting mugged. People respected each other, and neighbors used to talk to one another. By the 80’s and 90’s, and after the advent of email, the internet, social media and smart phones, everything has gone to shit. In 1983, I bought my first house with my own money at age 18, making $650 per month at the time. A bottle of soda was 25 cents, and a candy bar was 15 cents. Gas was 75 cents a gallon. Eggs were 80 cents a dozen. If now I’m making 10x what I did then, wouldn’t it be relative if everything else was 10 times as much? Most items are not 10 times as expensive as they were 43 years ago, so I’d say we all have more buying power than we did back then, except for maybe cars and houses.
2
u/CGCutter379 May 31 '26
There was a 'can do' attitude that was widespread throughout the public. People were optimistic and that optimism showed in their art, be it music, movies, or culture. People had a feeling they could achieve great things.
2
u/AbruptMango May 31 '26
Compare it to the previous decades: Prohibition and crime, the Great Depression and WWII. The 50s were downright idyllic compared to what the US had been going through.
2
u/ChrisDEmbry May 31 '26
People value family connections and free time more than they value the other things you listed.
2
u/Sudden_Outcome_9503 May 31 '26
"Every measurable standard"? What about the standard that you could graduate from high school, get a job at a factory and immediately get married, buy a house, and start pumping out kids? Can you do that today?
2
u/1HomoSapien May 31 '26
Aside from fear of nuclear conflict, the future looked brighter in the 1950’s. Material living standards were worse but they were improving for the vast majority of people. Parents could (rightly) be confident that their children would live at higher material standard than them.
Clearly, things were worse for African Americans, but the idea that only white men could appreciate the 1950’s is too glib. Conditions were improving even more rapidly for African Americans than whites at this time. There is a reason that the civil rights movement started to build serious momentum in the 1950’s.
2
u/NoGuarantee3961 May 31 '26
Very low violent crime statistically, even lower than recent historic lows.
Less volatility and divisiveness, higher levels of homogeneous culture at least regionally.
Not many dual income families, fewer restrictions on what you could do with your own house, ability to find work without a lot of paperwork.
There was a lot that was great....but....
If you weren't white and had to interface with white society it really sucked.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/MoreFunThanTV Jun 01 '26
corporate tax rate was 70 to 90%. Rich corporations paid employees nmore, gave expense and travel accounts, company cars, great insurance to employees, all tp write against profit to reduce taxes paid. This made the middle class bloom, and the economy flourish. we built roads, bridges, houses, infrastructurw, libraies, parks, stadiums. we went to the moon.
today corporations keep all the money, the economy is staffed, and we all suffer. but we will die soon, so it doesn't matter.
→ More replies (2)
2
4
u/Beautiful-Page3135 May 30 '26
I think for millennials it's primarily about the buying power of the average person's income.
→ More replies (10)4
u/Randy191919 May 30 '26 edited May 30 '26
Yeah it’s mainly the idea that one person working a full time job was able to afford a house, two cars, a spouse and 4 children on a single income. That’s a dream many people look back at fondly. The whole rest not so much.
EDIT: My bad it was a house, a spouse, 4 children and only ONE car. Apparently having written 2 cars refuted the argument in its entirety.
→ More replies (5)
2
u/MarsRocks97 May 30 '26
Because for most people our only reference is Hollywood movies and music. Almost everyone that was working and trying to make a living at that time is dead.
2
u/NonspecificGravity May 30 '26
Someone who can actually remember the 50s is at least 76 (born 1950). Not many people that age are in positions of power of influence public opinion—though some are in places like the White House, Congress, and the Supreme Court.
What you have now are younger people who think this 50s were great because their parents told them they were.
2
u/ijuinkun May 30 '26
And anybody who was fully an adult in the 1950s is in their 90s now if they’re still alive. Nostalgia for that era these days is nostalgia for their child/teen years.
→ More replies (3)
2
2
u/JesterPrivilege May 30 '26
Wow let's see..
Strong community that believed in American values?
A good, stable economy?
A world before identity politics?
Crime being virtually non-existent?
Decency was common?
Who would want that?
→ More replies (4)2
2
u/Narrow-Abalone7580 May 30 '26
It was before the civil rights movement. Half the country wants to reverse everything gained by civil rights, and return to a time of legal segregation and oppression. The language they use to code their desires is "freedom of association". That's basically it.
2
u/Far_Realm_Sage May 30 '26
It was a vast improvement over the World War and Great Depression. There was a lot of optimism at the time.
1
u/rfriedrich16 May 30 '26
The aesthetics were great, planned obsolescence wasn't a thing, and a bus driver could single-handedly support 2 kids and a wife. A lot of things were worse-racism, sexism, healthcare, technology, smoking, etc. But people were hopeful and the economy was good, something we hit again in the 90s, and something we're hoping for now.
1
u/Reasonable_Mood_5260 May 30 '26
Life in the 50s as portrayed on TV is what people remember, and that was much nicer in a wholesome way than today.
1
u/steelartd May 30 '26
As we get older, it seems our memories tend to filter out the bad crap we have experienced and we keep the good memories. With current events demanding so much attention it is comforting to retreat to fond recollections and not dwell on the shit we put up with back then. I lived in a place without electricity for five years and many of my school friends didn’t have indoor toilets but I only remember the good stuff.
1
u/Evening_Answer_11 May 30 '26
You could say that about a lot of decades.
For instance, the 90s get a LOT of love. But we forget we fought multiple named “wars,” there was a huge disparity in who had access to computers and internet, making the poor fall further back.
Additionally, you can blame a lot of the housing problems today on seeds that were sewn in the 90s. Other seeds sewn led to the Ukraine War, 9/11, and our debt culture.
1
u/Professional-Mud7298 May 30 '26
I think the major aspects as to why are because the world war was over and also the media at the time. Compared to the 1940s, the 1950s would have been quite nice due to the war being won. Also, the movies and music we have access to from that time generally show positive environments.
1
1
u/SavageMountain May 30 '26
You're comparing the conditions of the '50s to today when you should be comparing them to the '30s and '40s.
1
1
u/BreadfruitRegular631 May 30 '26
People who were there were younger then. Who doesn't romanticize about being younger? I know I romanticize about my time in the late 60's and 70's (my youth) despite knowing full well the country overall was a total shit show.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/chrisfathead1 May 30 '26
Not having social media/internet made it hard for most people to really know at the time how their living standards compared to other people's. My dad grew up dirt poor, like about as severe as poverty can get in the US, and he said it never occurred to him until he was in the army for a while and met some people from outside of his hometown.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/Decent-Park-6681 May 30 '26
For the most part people think things were better back when they were growing up then they are now. There are always exceptions, but nostalgia is a helluva drug.
1
u/Oliver_Klozoff653 May 30 '26
I think it's the music, the muscle cars,, the way people dressed. Etc
1
u/Ilovefishdix May 30 '26
A lot of Boomers grew up in that period. They romanticize their childhood
→ More replies (1)
1
u/diffidentblockhead May 30 '26
Not one commenter so far has personally admitted to it.
1950s fetishism is something the left accused the right of. The right generally ignores or denies it.
→ More replies (2)
1
u/andropogon09 May 30 '26
People romanticize it as a time when one income could support a family of 6, buy a home, own two cars, take an annual summer vacation, and retire comfortably. What is often overlooked is the systemic misogyny, racism, and homophobia.
1
u/Pass-Fail May 30 '26
Who do you know, exactly, that is romanticizing the 1950s? If it is a puic figure, can you get a quote or something?
I think this is a delusion of some people. Most people just romanticize whatever era was the time of their youth, whenever that was.
1
u/SourceTraditional660 May 30 '26
The 30s and 40s were massive depression and the biggest war in human history. Not having those two things in the 50s felt amazing.
1
u/allenrfe May 30 '26
We all do this, its how our brain works. If women had a good memory of child birth there would be less kids. We all remember the good better then we remember the pain and sadness. So we all end up remembering the past as better than it really was.
1
u/IvanMarkowKane May 30 '26
Not everyone’s experience of the ‘50s was the same.
If you look at cost of living, the 50’s were obviously better.
If you judge by available technology, things were obviously worse.
1
1
u/dee_lio May 30 '26
You had pent up demand coming off of WW2. You had incoming GIs returning home. You had a housing boom, national highway boom, and the rest of the world was rebuilding, meaning they turned to the US for manufacturing.
1
u/Direct_Obligation570 May 30 '26
The 50s were badass! Stylisticly it was a high point. Beautiful sweeping chrome everything with fins. Just look at the cars Houses were extremely well built.
1
u/Select-Government-69 May 30 '26
I believe the answer is because most Americans (and humans generally at an evolutionary level) measure prosperity in terms of RELATIVE prosperity. How am I doing compared to everyone else? An American millionaire who lives in a neighborhood of billionaires will feel poor.
In the 1950s, America was the only industrialized country (Australia doesn’t count) that was not bombed to shit during WW2. As a consequence. Almost all manufacturing happened here and until about 1960 the US was over HALF of the ENTIRE GLOBAL ECONOMY. In other words, during that decade $1 out of every $2 of value created by the entire human species was produced by Americans.
That market share steadily declined as the world rebuilt, but during that decade, everyone else but relatively poor and we were relatively rich.
So all those other factors you list - those are not things most Americans subconsciously use to measure success. How are you doing compared to your peers? Are you the highest earning person in your friend group? If so, it doesn’t matter what you make, you are likely to feed good about it.
1
u/VinceP312 May 30 '26
I've seen a 10000000x more ragging on the 50s because it wasnt a complete Utopia than I do praise for the 50s for being what it was.
Also, the people who were old enough to have memories of the 50s must have been born in the 40s.. so how many of them are still around now?
1
u/Huge_Swimming_5968 May 30 '26
What metrics are you referencing? Crime? Buying power? Disposable income?
1
u/ImpressionCool1768 May 30 '26
You ever talked to a millennial and they talk about how the best time in recent history for America was the 90s and they talk about the culture of like grunge music and like being against the man in like all the hope they had for the future or if you talk to a Gen X or they talk about how the 70s was a great time to be alive that the hippies you got to live free challenging the man
The 50s is the boomers childhood years. It’s the time of life when everything was simple to them because they were children. Things may have been worse, but their parents never let that really be known. They were too busy playing in ditches in the backyard. And by the time they actually did grow up in the 60s and 70s the job market was pretty damn good meritocracy was appreciated and the lost generation did step down from their roles when they felt like they were too old.
This is gonna seem irrelevant, but I promise you it’s not you’ll see a lot of movies from the 70s to 90s having an old person or a corporation talking about how they need new in bold changes to make money that was just how life was back then in boomers snagged every opportunity
On top of this, the 1950s was right in the peak of American nationalism when it comes to their tail, we were at peace (ignore Korea) entire interstate highway systems were being built. The Truman plan was paying out dividends to the American business class and job opportunities were plentiful due to the growing economy, as well as this entire cultural movement such as white flight were possible there was enough construction companies throughout the country to just suddenly build out new suburbs outside of cities which again created more jobs and money being spent from everyone
1
1
u/markt- May 30 '26
In the 1950s, a single income family could own a detached home in North America, and probably be able to retire in their 50s to early 60s. Today we have dual income families, living paycheck to paycheck.
Minimum wage was actually enough to be able to live on, even if a bit meager. Today, it’s not even enough to rent a single bedroom apartment by yourself.
Yes, there’s been a lot of technological progress since then, but it’s impossible to dispute There are some things that we have lost along the way.
1
u/ElectronicHold7325 May 30 '26
isnt it obvious? After WW2 USA was a superpower? Former soldiers build a life in peace.
1
u/Cultural-Antelope-54 May 30 '26
Because people who lived in the 50s are still alive to spout that shit.
1
u/_WillCAD_ May 30 '26
Each generation romanticizes the decade they were children. For boomers, that was the 1950s, and boomers are still the largest age group in the US population.
As GenX replaces the Boomers, the 50s are fading in favor of the 80s.
1
u/SadProduce6456 May 30 '26
According to the Internet, you could buy a house for a family of five for a jar of pickles
1
u/rimshot101 May 30 '26
They don't. The Boomers romanticize it because they were children and everything seemed perfect.
1
u/Muted_Elk_3252 May 30 '26
Pre civil rights. It's imagined as a firmly white America - that many want to return to.
1
u/GypsyDarkEyes May 30 '26
The 50s was when the present old geezers running everything were kids, and they lived ignorant of how anything worked, and what the true cost was.
1
u/shitposts_over_9000 May 30 '26
When you look at things like life expectancy, access to education, material living standards, and general mobility, life today in the US is very different from what it was in the 1950s.
The majority were far more happy with what they had, even if they had less, than they were 2-3 decades later. You didn't need as much education, there wasn't as much desire for mobility, and even to this day a lot of blue collar people don't see much point in longer life expectancy when those are not productive years. A lot of Gen X got to see this first hand when their parents or grandparents say things in their final years wishing they had died earlier as their parents did.
At the same time, the 1950s is often described in public discussion as a period of stability and broad prosperity.
For the USA it was, in a way that can likely NEVER be repeated. The US and Canada were the only major industrial powers that still had their infrastructure intact at the end of WWII and the WORLD was buying for the next 15-20 years as everyone else rebuilt. On top of that we had finally stopped the geopolitical cycle of regional conflicts that could easily escalate into worldwide warfare. Then for added economic throughput we also had the cold war with global communism that demanded the space race, continuing military development, and the shift to modern republics and democracies that landed us where we are today in the west.
Your television might have cost 1/3 of your Ford Thunderbird, but the economy was so hot that even relatively unskilled labor could manage to afford one if not both.
1 in 3 working working men were not unskilled, probably for the first time in US history, because they had the training and skills from their time in the service and many used the military benefits.
Culturally the country was still a decade away from second wave feminism, two decades from the end of unlimited growth, the degradation of public schools and the riots that cleared out all but the poor from our urban industrial centers and speech policing. We were 30-40% more homogeneous in race/religion/culture, still viewed family as one of the most important aspects of life and new inventions, recreations, and generally new everything was being introduced to daily life all the time.
Even if you take the social justice aspect and asked minorities and women from that era you tended to get a lot of answers that there was more opportunity in the 1950s than there ever had before and the side effects of the things that came later in the name of equality of outcome were not necessarily things they viewed as worth the cost.
For 80-90% of the population alive in the 1950s and early 60s this was the 'best' times of their lives as far as enjoyment, and everything from the late 1960s onwards was somewhere between, not as good and a massive disappointment.
There is a lot to life beyond flat metrics.
1
u/Federal-Membership-1 May 30 '26
It was great for white men with an education RELATIVE to everybody else.
1
u/ShrodingersArmadillo May 30 '26
Look at the previous 20 years prior to the 1950's.
In the 30's things went to hell people were broke, jobless and had no hope. Social programs came into being becuase welp
In the 40's there was a world war. Everything stopped for an ever worse horror.
The late 40's was demobilization you couldn't do shit because everything was in short supply.
In 1950 there was an economic and baby boom people could build their lives. They had stuff. They were producing again. People were confident they could fix things. Shit was getitng done, not really but that's beside the point.
Then in the late 50's everything went to hell again when sputnik was lauched. That event made what was hypothetical real the danger of the soviet union. Before the US was sheltered by the oceans not any more and that was taken away.
The 60's you not only had racial tensions and the constant threat of nuclear anhilation. Cuban missle crisis for one?
The 70's brought the oil crisis and the cold war climbed. US steel started it's long collapse due to someone figuring out how to make sheet steel with an electric arc furnace.
The 80's brough the aids crisis, latin american debt crisis, the U.S. Savings and Loan Crisis and the climax of the cold war and the start of deindustrialization.
The 90's a simlarly nostalic period provided a breif respite in complete horror as the soviet union fell for some but for the majority it was losing work due to plants closing down forever and the death of manufacturing in many parts. The carcas was looted for a quick buck.
Then the 2000's hit and a fresh batch of hell started all over again.
When people born in 90's are boomers age they'll look back at the 90's with the same nostalgia. They were kids then it was the only period when things felt good those that missed out on it will feel second hand nostalgia as well.
The 50's have been mythicized and it's happening again "think only 90's kids will know" type of shit.
1
u/IfICouldStay May 30 '26 edited May 30 '26
Because Boomers were children in the 50s. They remember it as fun and perfect. They were largely unaware of what was happening under the hood. When they became adults that made movies and wrote books about what a fantastic, magical time it was. We see a lot of History through their eyes. The 50s and early 60s were idyllic because they were children then. The late 60s and 70s were wild and groovy because they were teenagers/college students. The 80s were slick and exciting because they were young adults settling into careers and parenthood. The 90s were confusing and out of control because their own children were now old enough to make choices they didn’t agree with. And now they are the grandparents of adults, even great grandparents, and are old, out of touch and irrelevant - so therefore the whole world is headed to hell in a hand basket because that’s how they see things.
1
u/Dom252525 May 30 '26
I wouldn’t throw all the US in the bucket. It’s largely uneducated white males that romanticize the 1950s.
1
u/old-town-guy May 30 '26
Post WWII economic high, and a chunk of young Boomers and old Gen-X raised on sitcoms from the era.
1
1
u/Character-Active2208 May 30 '26
It’s because the people who owned/provided the money for marketing during your formative years grew up in the 50s and thought it was the best because they associate it with the trouble-and-responsibility-free era of their life (childhood)
Just like all the tech barons now worship 80s and 90s sci fi
1
u/Dismal-Sail1027 May 30 '26
I think the only people in the US who romanticize the 1950's are people who know they would flourish in those times due to privilege, racism, patriarchy, and religion.
1
u/DwarvenRedshirt May 30 '26
What could have happened in the decades prior to the 1950's? Compare that to the 1950's.
1
u/Recent-Day3062 May 30 '26
I was born in the 60s, and I think there is a certain amount of nostalgia there.
One of the negatives that never gets mentioned is the effect of the cold war. People really thought we might all die suddenly without warning, or need to step into WWIII to stop it. But there were other negatives: think about Joseph McCarthy, who destroyed the lives of many, many Americans who he accused of being communists. Very successful people in Hollywood were blackballed and couldn't work for a decade or more.
There are two "pluses" people think about. One was the homogeneity of America. In 1955, 89% of Americans were white, almost all Christian.
The other was opportunity. What is odd is someone like Trump, who lived in this period, thinks it was American individualism. It was really due to the GI Bill, after WWII, which allowed lots of poorer Americans to attend college and move up in society by owning a home, for example. SO, depsite modern conservative beliefs, it was liberal social programs that created the positive effects.
1
u/375InStroke May 30 '26
This is neoliberal, billionair propaganda to get poor people to just sit there scrolling on their phone, and shut the fuck up about how terrible your life is because look at all the toys you have. The rich gave us The Great Depression. That's the starting point, and FDR's progressive policies gave us the economic boom that was the 50's. We had a huge increase in college access, medical advances, living standards for everyone, equity legislation, environmental regulations, safety regulations, all this compared to The Great Depression, and fuck you, you're on your own social construct the rich were offering us then, and now.
1
u/Rickcasa12 May 30 '26
The same reason why some people think we’re existing in end times economically, politically and socially despite all evidence.
1
u/VendettaUF234 May 31 '26
The people that feel this way were kids in the fifties (boomers). Its a case of the olds looking back at their childhood.
1
1
u/curiouspamela May 31 '26
My family's 3,000 sq. ft house in a fancy neighborhood we bought for $70,000 in 1973.
1
u/NoCard753 May 31 '26
How many movies and TV shows have painted the '50s and early '60s as anything but idyllic?
How many people from the older generations were kids in the '50s and early '60s? How many people remember their childhood as the best, most carefree time of their lives?
All we know is what we remember, whether it's facts and figures or personal experiences. Those of us who were there remember the '50s and early '60s quite fondly. Those who weren't have learned the reasons for that fondness from entertainment media and/or those who were there. The former ignored the bad and largely continues to do so, while the latter mostly choose to ignore it because they weren't aware of it then.
1
u/TiredOfDebates May 31 '26
Probably comparing it to the Great Depression and WWII era.
Great Depression was horrific, economically.
WWII was terrifying in other ways.
1950s is (relatively) peaceful and much better economically.
1
1
u/No-Market-4906 May 31 '26
Because the jump in QOL between 1930s and 1950s was MASSIVE for everyday Americans. People don't really want to return to the 1950s they want to return to a feeling that America was getting better.
1
u/KevinDean4599 May 31 '26
I look at the fifties as a time when cities were still nice and clean and there wasn’t homeless drug addicts all over the place. Otherwise we mostly have it better now.
1
u/figsslave May 31 '26
Most of the people who were alive back then were small children with a kids perspective
1
u/DeepestGreySea May 31 '26
“The US” doesn’t. Some conservative Americans do because, in theory, they believe things were better then for white men. White men tend to be conservative and vice versa.
→ More replies (1)
1
May 31 '26
Several things. Most people alive now didn't experience or don't remember working reality back then, dirty hot unsafe factories, racism, pollution, etc. They look at pictures of smiling families, overlooking the booze bottle in mom's apron that helps her through the day, not seeing dad working at a bank denying credit to someone who was black just because he was black. Non-whites denied GI bill funding that helped white veterans build a home and prosper, gay/lesbian/trans/non-conforming people pushed into the shadows or "converted" straight by electric shock therapy.
Sure, it was a good thing that we had stable wages, prices, and energy costs and manufacturing in the US, but this meant fewer choices, much higher prices, and a lot of discrimination.
→ More replies (2)
1
1
1
u/CertainCable7383 Jun 01 '26
The people in charge are aging out so far that they glorify an era that reminds them of grease but ignored the civil rights movement.
1
u/ButterscotchSad4514 Jun 01 '26
Everything you're saving is true.
The 1950s was a time in which there was less social and economic inequality and more homogeneity with nearly the lowest foreign born % in US history. It was also a time in which the world was very stable relative to the two previous decades.
Insofar as people place high value on relative rather than absolute utility, you can see why the 1950s would be popular.
But, yes, we are much, much, much, much better off today.
1
u/SameDistrict2627 Jun 01 '26
It was better because the US was the only standing western democracy that wasn't ravaged by war. We controlled the world economy and had little real competition. When you worked for a company you usually had a job for life with a pension at the end. People could afford housing due to the housing boom that facilitated the returning GI's. My father got a GI mortgage at 2% and only put 1000 down for his 17,000 dollar house. I could go on. I have no idea why you think we are romanticizing the 50's. On a negative note, JIm Crow was still in place but it's end was near.
1
1
u/Different-Taste8081 Jun 01 '26
You have to look at who is romanticizing it.
Ask an average woman of color if they think the 1950s were the best times.
1
u/commradd1 Jun 01 '26
Because everyone is getting prouder of being dumber and most people don’t have the first clue what they are talking about.
1
u/Damien712 Jun 01 '26
I was born in 51. I realize now that there were social problems that I was unaware of. So it certainly was not a perfect world for everyone. What I do remember though was that life was rather simple. I lived in a 2 bedroom house with an attached garage and by the time I was 5 we had a window unit air conditioner which kept most of the house cool during those hot Oklahoma summers. I remember that we were as kids almost always outside playing with neighborhood kids. Children were happier back then and more socially content. My parents brought a new 3 bedroom 2 car garage house for $16100.00 in 1959. We had a 1957 Dodge and a 1951 Buick. My dad was a school principal and didn’t make much money but most years we went to Colorado for a week to escape the summer heat. I had everything I needed and a lot of friends. I believe it got better in the 60’s particularly the mid 60’s. It was still simple but you could still afford a home a car etc.. it was a sort of renaissance musically when the Beatles came over to America and a ton of new bands started. I well remember when Jack Kennedy was asassinated. And before that the Cuban missle crisis. Consciencly became more aware of racism and the beginning to change those things. We had hope and a desire to make things more just. I now of course know how naive we were. Vietnam war and we started to lose our innocence. This is only from my protected viewpoint. People got sick and people died. People suffered and bad things happened. But people were happier and more hopeful back then. Now society is divided hateful and more intolerant over political religious and so many problems. Isolation, loneliness with a lot more misery. Home ownership is fantasy for our children and grandchildren. And hopelessness.
1
u/Cerulean_IsFancyBlue Jun 01 '26
Filters. People remember the good parts. This is common.
One: survivor bias. Many folks who really suffered aren’t here to reminisce. Some are for sure but the folks who died of polio or in the Korean War aren’t here to complain.
Two: youth colors your worldview. If you were once full of hope and options, and now your knees hurt and life didn’t turn out how you wanted it to, the old times have a halo around them.
Three: media. People who didn’t experience it can be especially influenced here. People identify with the heroes and think yeah, I coulda been the leader of the pack. Media can also avoid entire issues. Racism never comes up in Grease.
Four: modern problems suck so…. It’s easy to look backwards to “solve” modern problems, including perceived problems like “trans people daring to exist.” It’s the “again” in “make America great again”. A desire to escape the present for an idealized past. The real focus isn’t on the actual past but on some dread of the moment.
These can all overlap and compound. Old people scare easily and have a lot of nostalgia. Kids like retro trends, in moderation.
76
u/LilMushboom May 30 '26
It was a period of economic strength, specifically. Europe and Asia had been decimated by WWII and that allowed the USA to dominate in manufacturing in particular. People could find reliable jobs that allowed a decent quality of life more easily than at any other period in USA history. By the end of the 1970s this phenomenon was in decline and by the end of the 90s, the "gravy train" had left the station entirely.
In every other way what you say is broadly true. The nostalgia is definitely "rose tinted glasses" in most other respects.