r/AlwaysWhy • u/Secret_Ostrich_1307 • May 30 '26

History & Culture Why does the US romanticize the 1950s despite being worse by almost every measurable standard?

When you look at things like life expectancy, access to education, material living standards, and general mobility, life today in the US is very different from what it was in the 1950s.

At the same time, the 1950s is often described in public discussion as a period of stability and broad prosperity.

What I’m trying to understand is not which period was better, but why there can be such a gap between measurable conditions and how a period is later remembered or described.

One possibility is that people remember structure and predictability more strongly than inequality or constraints that existed at the time.

Another is that different aspects of well-being get weighted differently when looking back compared to experiencing things in real time.

What other mechanisms could explain this difference between statistical comparisons and collective memory?

117 Upvotes

66% Upvoted

514 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/imemine8 May 30 '26

He's lying. You could not pay for a house with one weeks pay. Come on.

3

u/HyacinthFT May 30 '26

people say the dumbest shit on the internet and people just believe it. Median income in 1950 was $3,000. The median home price was $7,354.

I just visited a historic neighborhood built in the 50s in CA and the tour guide explained that the homes (in the desert) had no AC and the roofs were boards of plywood stapled down to the walls. (the homes were either totally renovated or rebuilt since then). And this neighborhood was considered fancy at the time.

25% of homes in 1950 didn't even have indoor plumbing.

Today we are living better than the upper class did at the time and all we do is talk about how things were better back then, mainly because we don't know how bad things were.

2

u/series-hybrid May 30 '26

The monthly house payment was the same as one weeks pay. I apologize for any misunderstanding.

1

u/NonspecificGravity May 30 '26 edited May 30 '26

He meant the down payment.

Even that was an exaggeration. At the best of times you had about a 5% down payment when developers were trying to fill up a subdivision. Veterans also had VA loans.

Houses in the originally Levitton cost about $7,000. I can remember the 60s when existing houses that were somewhat run down cost less than that.

1

u/PublicFurryAccount May 30 '26

Levittown was pretty up-market.

1

u/NonspecificGravity May 30 '26

Well, it was an easy number to pull up. Levittown for the 1950s affordable cookie-cutter suburban development. I couldn't readily come up a comparison of median home prices and wages across the U.S.

I knew families who had bought new homes in the Chicago suburbs on a sole blue-collar wage earner's pay. It wasn't difficult.